<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekend Transaction Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:26:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe R</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/#comment-85073</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6569#comment-85073</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what&#039;s funny, TJ. The Braves do put it on the scoreboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what&#8217;s funny, TJ. The Braves do put it on the scoreboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/#comment-85068</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6569#comment-85068</guid>
		<description>its a great quote but i think most teams do put it on the scoreboard, the tigers do anyway. do any other teams do it? clearly the braves dont</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its a great quote but i think most teams do put it on the scoreboard, the tigers do anyway. do any other teams do it? clearly the braves dont</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hans</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/#comment-84905</link>
		<dc:creator>hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6569#comment-84905</guid>
		<description>oh but where&#039;s the fun in considering the context of a quote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh but where&#8217;s the fun in considering the context of a quote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawon</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/#comment-84904</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6569#comment-84904</guid>
		<description>Ok, I feel the need to say something, because this is the third time (Here, BP, Rob Neyer) that Omar&#039;s &quot;he can play a lot of games&quot; comment has been taken out of context.  

I am not defending the trade (I also think it&#039;s pointless), but Omar&#039;s comment was clearly a jab at Ryan Church, who had fallen out of favor with the team and had a reputation for not wanting to play everyday.  Jerry Manuel also said something similar (&quot;I think he&#039;s [Frenchy] looking at proving he can play and wants to play on this stage,&quot; Manuel said) in comparing Francoeur to Church, and how Francoeur&#039;s desire to start was a net positive for the club.

I&#039;m not advocating that the Mets are right (and personally I think they really mishandled Church&#039;s head injury last year) in how they feel about Church, but Omar&#039;s quote about games played should be taken more as a criticism of Church than anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I feel the need to say something, because this is the third time (Here, BP, Rob Neyer) that Omar&#8217;s &#8220;he can play a lot of games&#8221; comment has been taken out of context.  </p>
<p>I am not defending the trade (I also think it&#8217;s pointless), but Omar&#8217;s comment was clearly a jab at Ryan Church, who had fallen out of favor with the team and had a reputation for not wanting to play everyday.  Jerry Manuel also said something similar (&#8220;I think he&#8217;s [Frenchy] looking at proving he can play and wants to play on this stage,&#8221; Manuel said) in comparing Francoeur to Church, and how Francoeur&#8217;s desire to start was a net positive for the club.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not advocating that the Mets are right (and personally I think they really mishandled Church&#8217;s head injury last year) in how they feel about Church, but Omar&#8217;s quote about games played should be taken more as a criticism of Church than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidceisen</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/#comment-84891</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidceisen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6569#comment-84891</guid>
		<description>&#039;Frenchy&#039; is Jeff Francoeur</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Frenchy&#8217; is Jeff Francoeur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/#comment-84887</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6569#comment-84887</guid>
		<description>who is this &#039;Frenchy&#039;? - the one with the quote?

fricken hilarious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who is this &#8216;Frenchy&#8217;? &#8211; the one with the quote?</p>
<p>fricken hilarious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CH</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/#comment-84880</link>
		<dc:creator>CH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6569#comment-84880</guid>
		<description>I thought they were teaching Santana to play 3B, too.  I&#039;m still surprised by that trade, even this far after the fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought they were teaching Santana to play 3B, too.  I&#8217;m still surprised by that trade, even this far after the fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe R</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/#comment-84878</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6569#comment-84878</guid>
		<description>I still think accessing salary values in a linear fashion to win values is inaccurate given the current FA market (ex: a 2.5 win player will not get 1/2 what a 5 win guy will). And I was actually refering to 2011, Blake will turn 38 during the season. I was aware of the 2012 buyout option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think accessing salary values in a linear fashion to win values is inaccurate given the current FA market (ex: a 2.5 win player will not get 1/2 what a 5 win guy will). And I was actually refering to 2011, Blake will turn 38 during the season. I was aware of the 2012 buyout option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/#comment-84877</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6569#comment-84877</guid>
		<description>The 6MM in &#039;12 is a club option (1.25MM buyout) so it doesn&#039;t need to be picked up. And Blake&#039;s been a ~2 WAR player consistently since becoming a regular, so even accounting for regression it wasn&#039;t a bad deal -- especially now that he&#039;s threating to be worth the 17.5MM this year alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 6MM in &#8217;12 is a club option (1.25MM buyout) so it doesn&#8217;t need to be picked up. And Blake&#8217;s been a ~2 WAR player consistently since becoming a regular, so even accounting for regression it wasn&#8217;t a bad deal &#8212; especially now that he&#8217;s threating to be worth the 17.5MM this year alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe R</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/weekend-transaction-roundup/#comment-84864</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=6569#comment-84864</guid>
		<description>Even though Blake is possibly having by far his best season ever at 35-36.

Someone explain this occurance to me? More blind man Coletti luck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though Blake is possibly having by far his best season ever at 35-36.</p>
<p>Someone explain this occurance to me? More blind man Coletti luck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

