<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WS Coverage: Girardi Screws Up The Line-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefatkid</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/#comment-105112</link>
		<dc:creator>thefatkid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 17:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10854#comment-105112</guid>
		<description>Care to explain why, if catching doesn&#039;t matter, almost every single Yankee pitcher has pitched better to catchers not named Posada for the duration of Posada&#039;s career?  Is this some sort of magical decade-plus aberrant coincidence?

Bad defensive catching negatively impacts pitching.  The fact that you haven&#039;t figured out how to quantify catching doesn&#039;t somehow make it unimportant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Care to explain why, if catching doesn&#8217;t matter, almost every single Yankee pitcher has pitched better to catchers not named Posada for the duration of Posada&#8217;s career?  Is this some sort of magical decade-plus aberrant coincidence?</p>
<p>Bad defensive catching negatively impacts pitching.  The fact that you haven&#8217;t figured out how to quantify catching doesn&#8217;t somehow make it unimportant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel B</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/#comment-105038</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10854#comment-105038</guid>
		<description>prove it wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>prove it wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bflaff</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/#comment-105007</link>
		<dc:creator>bflaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10854#comment-105007</guid>
		<description>Are you suggesting that in the span of 3-4 ABs, both players will revert to their mean? Surely not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you suggesting that in the span of 3-4 ABs, both players will revert to their mean? Surely not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/#comment-104999</link>
		<dc:creator>Wally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10854#comment-104999</guid>
		<description>What would be his motivation for lying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be his motivation for lying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/#comment-104988</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10854#comment-104988</guid>
		<description>Probably part of the reason why the Tigers are watching from their couches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably part of the reason why the Tigers are watching from their couches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Typical Idiot Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/#comment-104981</link>
		<dc:creator>Typical Idiot Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10854#comment-104981</guid>
		<description>Prove it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/#comment-104922</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10854#comment-104922</guid>
		<description>As a Tiger fan, I would like to say:

Girardi starting Hairston for his 10-27 line is much better than Leyland starting similar players for no reason at all, other than they&#039;re a player and therefore they can play. Leyland would&#039;ve batted Hairston third just to show him he believes in him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Tiger fan, I would like to say:</p>
<p>Girardi starting Hairston for his 10-27 line is much better than Leyland starting similar players for no reason at all, other than they&#8217;re a player and therefore they can play. Leyland would&#8217;ve batted Hairston third just to show him he believes in him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe R</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/#comment-104892</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10854#comment-104892</guid>
		<description>Yankees escape via talent, in the process hellbent on turning Nick Swisher into the new SSS villain of NYC.

Look at how well &quot;playing the hot guys&quot; went for Torre in the NLCS, Girardi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yankees escape via talent, in the process hellbent on turning Nick Swisher into the new SSS villain of NYC.</p>
<p>Look at how well &#8220;playing the hot guys&#8221; went for Torre in the NLCS, Girardi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob in CT</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/#comment-104880</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob in CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10854#comment-104880</guid>
		<description>I thought the bunt was a bad idea, before any pitches were thrown.  I knew it was coming, because even if Girardi hadn&#039;t called for it, Jeter would have done it on his own.  He&#039;s like that with bunting.

Anyway, to me there are pros and cons to a sac bunt there.  Pro is that getting even one more run, with Mo on the mound for the 9th, would be huge.  Getting two runs would be massive.  Con - Chan Ho Park was pitching, and I don&#039;t think much of Chan Ho Park.  He had just given up a line drive single to Posada.  Jeter is a good hitter, albeit a righty (I assume Park is tougher on righties?).  I felt pretty good about his chances of turning that rally into something big.  Instead, he &quot;gives himself up&quot; and hands the Phillies an out.  Worse, obviously, was his decision to bunt with 2 strikes, as he didn&#039;t even advance the runners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the bunt was a bad idea, before any pitches were thrown.  I knew it was coming, because even if Girardi hadn&#8217;t called for it, Jeter would have done it on his own.  He&#8217;s like that with bunting.</p>
<p>Anyway, to me there are pros and cons to a sac bunt there.  Pro is that getting even one more run, with Mo on the mound for the 9th, would be huge.  Getting two runs would be massive.  Con &#8211; Chan Ho Park was pitching, and I don&#8217;t think much of Chan Ho Park.  He had just given up a line drive single to Posada.  Jeter is a good hitter, albeit a righty (I assume Park is tougher on righties?).  I felt pretty good about his chances of turning that rally into something big.  Instead, he &#8220;gives himself up&#8221; and hands the Phillies an out.  Worse, obviously, was his decision to bunt with 2 strikes, as he didn&#8217;t even advance the runners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob in CT</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ws-coverage-girardi-screws-up-the-line-up/#comment-104879</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob in CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=10854#comment-104879</guid>
		<description>Jeter is usually a smart player.  But he has some sort of mental defect when it comes to bunting.  I think he believes bunting to be some sort of moral good thing to do, and feels honor bound to do it.  To the point of utter stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeter is usually a smart player.  But he has some sort of mental defect when it comes to bunting.  I think he believes bunting to be some sort of moral good thing to do, and feels honor bound to do it.  To the point of utter stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

