<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zack Greinke, FanGraphs Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/</link>
	<description>Daily baseball statistical analysis and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:21:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CH</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/#comment-108915</link>
		<dc:creator>CH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11711#comment-108915</guid>
		<description>&quot;But his decisive margin of victory over Seattle’s Felix Hernandez was a sign that voters overlooked his deficiency in another bedrock statistic: wins.&quot;

My father is about as anti-SABR as you can possibly be, and he refuses to even mention wins in a CY argument.  He has no idea what FIP or tRA are, but he knows looking at win totals is a bad way to judge talent.  Maybe &quot;traditional&quot; writers/voters have started to come to the same conclusion?

Obviously I wish they&#039;d check the numbers a little more often, but if my father is on the &quot;don&#039;t look at wins&quot; bandwagon, maybe we&#039;re moving into a golden age of baseball reason.

Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But his decisive margin of victory over Seattle’s Felix Hernandez was a sign that voters overlooked his deficiency in another bedrock statistic: wins.&#8221;</p>
<p>My father is about as anti-SABR as you can possibly be, and he refuses to even mention wins in a CY argument.  He has no idea what FIP or tRA are, but he knows looking at win totals is a bad way to judge talent.  Maybe &#8220;traditional&#8221; writers/voters have started to come to the same conclusion?</p>
<p>Obviously I wish they&#8217;d check the numbers a little more often, but if my father is on the &#8220;don&#8217;t look at wins&#8221; bandwagon, maybe we&#8217;re moving into a golden age of baseball reason.</p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nats fan</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/#comment-108905</link>
		<dc:creator>Nats fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11711#comment-108905</guid>
		<description>what is wrong with Dibble?  Its Carpenter that is the Moron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is wrong with Dibble?  Its Carpenter that is the Moron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe R</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/#comment-108842</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11711#comment-108842</guid>
		<description>.277/.330(!)/.459. Ouch. He was 2009 Jermaine Dye on the road for his career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.277/.330(!)/.459. Ouch. He was 2009 Jermaine Dye on the road for his career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/#comment-108817</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11711#comment-108817</guid>
		<description>Of course, its a requirement of FanGraphs correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, its a requirement of FanGraphs correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PL</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/#comment-108809</link>
		<dc:creator>PL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11711#comment-108809</guid>
		<description>Ever look at Jim Rice&#039;s numbers away from Boston? Below league average.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever look at Jim Rice&#8217;s numbers away from Boston? Below league average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Dimond</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/#comment-108789</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Dimond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11711#comment-108789</guid>
		<description>My knowledge of announcers outside Chicago is very limited, but I would assume that radio announcers tend to be bigger homers than TV announcers.  I grew up in Chicagoland and as I recall the Bulls radio guys in the Jordan years made a living villifying the refs, while the Bears radio team did an ad at one point mocking the notion of impartial game-calling.  And, of course, Santo, who truly is in a league of his own.  &quot;Oh, geez!&quot;

And radio guys can get away with a lot of homerism, as the radio audience is basically limited to the metro area; based on radio ads the target market for broadcasts (especially football, but baseball to some degree too) seems to be contractors and maintenance guys driving around between jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My knowledge of announcers outside Chicago is very limited, but I would assume that radio announcers tend to be bigger homers than TV announcers.  I grew up in Chicagoland and as I recall the Bulls radio guys in the Jordan years made a living villifying the refs, while the Bears radio team did an ad at one point mocking the notion of impartial game-calling.  And, of course, Santo, who truly is in a league of his own.  &#8220;Oh, geez!&#8221;</p>
<p>And radio guys can get away with a lot of homerism, as the radio audience is basically limited to the metro area; based on radio ads the target market for broadcasts (especially football, but baseball to some degree too) seems to be contractors and maintenance guys driving around between jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe R</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/#comment-108779</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11711#comment-108779</guid>
		<description>Exactly, Kevin.

At best, Lofton was equal to Raines, at worst, Raines was significantly better. And Lofton has a real Hall case.

So Raines should, logically, range from &quot;A Hall Case&quot; to &quot;A Dwight Howard in the 2008 Slam Dunk competition Dunk&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Kevin.</p>
<p>At best, Lofton was equal to Raines, at worst, Raines was significantly better. And Lofton has a real Hall case.</p>
<p>So Raines should, logically, range from &#8220;A Hall Case&#8221; to &#8220;A Dwight Howard in the 2008 Slam Dunk competition Dunk&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe R</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/#comment-108778</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11711#comment-108778</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what&#039;s funny about the Hall of Fame, Kevin. The standard for players w/ a particular skill set is way higher than the standard for other players.

Leadoff hitters still have a much bigger bar than Home Run hitters. Adam Dunn, for example, has a legit shot at 550 HR, which would put him in the top 15 of all time, and you have to go all the way down to Dave Kingman (currently 35th with 442, and FWIW only 106 ahead of Adam Dunn, meaning he could pass him easily by the end of 2012) to find someone that isn&#039;t in the Hall of Fame, and we all know Kingman&#039;s deficincies in every area outside of HR hitting. But as much as I love Adam Dunn, does his hitting balance out the poor defense? I can&#039;t bring myself to say yes.

Other examples (positional in nature) are 1Bs being overrated, while Second and Third basemen have historically had harder times getting to the Hall. 

18 1B
16 2B, but at least 3, and up to 5 of those were when 2B was one of the weaker defensive positons, closer to 1B than SS.
10(!) 3B, and three of them are Batting Average wonders Pie Traynor, Freddie Lindstrom and George Kell.

Third base is to baseball what Small Forward is to basketball, too many people really don&#039;t grip the importance of the position because it&#039;s really an unspectacular positon. Bob Elliott, Stan Hack, Darrell Evans, Ron Santo, the list goes on. For the here and now, Adrian Beltre and Brandon Inge, two lowish-OBP, average-SLG, big glove 3B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what&#8217;s funny about the Hall of Fame, Kevin. The standard for players w/ a particular skill set is way higher than the standard for other players.</p>
<p>Leadoff hitters still have a much bigger bar than Home Run hitters. Adam Dunn, for example, has a legit shot at 550 HR, which would put him in the top 15 of all time, and you have to go all the way down to Dave Kingman (currently 35th with 442, and FWIW only 106 ahead of Adam Dunn, meaning he could pass him easily by the end of 2012) to find someone that isn&#8217;t in the Hall of Fame, and we all know Kingman&#8217;s deficincies in every area outside of HR hitting. But as much as I love Adam Dunn, does his hitting balance out the poor defense? I can&#8217;t bring myself to say yes.</p>
<p>Other examples (positional in nature) are 1Bs being overrated, while Second and Third basemen have historically had harder times getting to the Hall. </p>
<p>18 1B<br />
16 2B, but at least 3, and up to 5 of those were when 2B was one of the weaker defensive positons, closer to 1B than SS.<br />
10(!) 3B, and three of them are Batting Average wonders Pie Traynor, Freddie Lindstrom and George Kell.</p>
<p>Third base is to baseball what Small Forward is to basketball, too many people really don&#8217;t grip the importance of the position because it&#8217;s really an unspectacular positon. Bob Elliott, Stan Hack, Darrell Evans, Ron Santo, the list goes on. For the here and now, Adrian Beltre and Brandon Inge, two lowish-OBP, average-SLG, big glove 3B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Typical Idiot Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/#comment-108775</link>
		<dc:creator>Typical Idiot Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11711#comment-108775</guid>
		<description>Anybody who can safely go by the name &quot;Rock&quot; should be in the Hall of Fame.  Lifetime .374 wOBA over nearly 22 seasons is nothing to sneeze at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody who can safely go by the name &#8220;Rock&#8221; should be in the Hall of Fame.  Lifetime .374 wOBA over nearly 22 seasons is nothing to sneeze at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin S.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/zack-greinke-fangraphs-reader/#comment-108774</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?p=11711#comment-108774</guid>
		<description>Holy lord, I used &#039;that&#039; a few too many times in that first sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy lord, I used &#8216;that&#8217; a few too many times in that first sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

