Jason Bourgeois Fits as a Royal

On Tuesday, the Kansas City Royals acquired Jason Bourgeois and Humberto Quintero from the Houston Astros in exchange for minor league reliever Kevin Chapman and a player to be named later (whom Jeff Luhnow told Brian McTaggart will be a key component of the deal). The acquisition of Quintero serves a clear purpose for the Royals, who are short on catching depth with Salvador Perez out up to three months with a knee injury. Royalty and the bourgeoisie have been a fantastic fit throughout history; does this continue with Jason Bourgeois and the Royals?

Dayton Moore told Bob Dutton of the Kansas City Star what he specifically likes about Bourgeois:

“We like his versatility a great deal,” Moore said. “He’s somebody who has been very successful against left-handed pitching.”

Moore has done his research. Bourgeois had a .406 wOBA against left-handed pitching in 2011 and owns a .345 career mark in the split. Bourgeois also has the speed to handle center field (and of course more than enough for a corner). So if Moore wanted a fourth outfielder specifically to use against lefties, Moore found a solid option.

But it doesn’t really fit with the rest of the Royals’ outfield, at least at first glance. The Royals have one left-handed starting outfielder, and that’s Alex Gordon. Gordon played like an MVP candidate last season and put up a .363 wOBA against right-handers — even if he comes back to earth in 2012, he should be good enough to warrant playing against righties. The other two outfielders — Lorenzo Cain and Jeff Francoeur — may be perfect platoon candidates, but they’re both right-handed. Francouer owns a .353 wOBA against lefties as opposed to just .307 against righties. So it would only really make sense if Lorenzo Cain exhibited a reverse platoon split.

As it turns out, he does. According to the data from the new version of Minor League Splits, Cain has performed better against right-handed pitching over the course of his minor league career, with a .296/.371/.421 line as opposed to .270/.362/.384 against lefties. It’s a minor split at best, enough where Bourgeois may be the significantly better play against left-handed pitching. This trend has continued through Cain’s short major league career as well.

It seems unlikely that Bourgeois will be used in a straight platoon with Cain. The Royals will need Cain to fill in for Gordon and Francoeur at times, and it would be in the Royals’ best interest to get more experience for Cain against all types of pitchers. He is the center fielder of the future, one of the pieces acquired in the Zack Greinke swap. Cain has the defensive chops to be worthy of playing time against any pitcher in the league. But Bourgeois gives the Royals another option with the speed to play all three outfield positions, and his ability to match up against left-handers suits the Royals’ roster surprisingly well.




Print This Post



If you enjoyed this post, please consider subscribing to Jack's new project, The Sports Desk on Beacon Reader. Jack also writes for Sports On Earth, The Classical, and has written for Disciples of Uecker and The Score, among others. Follow him on Twitter at @jh_moore.


10 Responses to “Jason Bourgeois Fits as a Royal”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. Gerry Geurts says:

    What about at 2nd base? He came up through the minors as an infielder, with Johnny Giavotella struggling this spring, do you think he finds some playing time there?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. kozilla says:

    I have been pondering the same thing. With Giavotella and Getz in competion for 2B maybe they envision using him as a super utility type.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • tz says:

      His defensive metrics at 2B are adequate, and he does hit lefties will. I’d take him in this role over Skip Schumaker any day.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Sax says:

    where does this leave Dyson?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. jpg says:

    I agree with article as a whole but I have one nitpick. Can we relax with the Gordon “had an MVP caliber season” narative? I’ve seen this in a few places and I continue to scratch my head over it. He had a breakout year on a crappy (albeit up and coming) team. An MVP type season is what Bautista and Ellsbury had. Gordon was a nice story and had a nice year. Can’t we just leave it at that and not try to make it out to be more than what it was?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Fish Bone Bobby says:

      Why bother with any subjective qualifiers, whether it is “MVP-type” or “a nice year”.

      Gordon finished with the 7th best fWAR among AL position players. Whether you interpret that to mean, MVP-type, a nice year, something else, or completely meaningless, is up to you.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Nats Fan says:

      He definitely had a year that deserved some MVP votes.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. David says:

    I think Gordon put up the .363 wOBA against LHP last year.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. CJ says:

    I am given to believe that reverse splits have to be regressed so incredibly heavily so as to have essentially no predictive value.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *