Jason Marquis, Pennant Race Linchpin?

It’s never too early to start wildly speculating about the MLB trade deadline. In the past three years, we’ve seen big names like Cliff Lee, Manny Ramirez, Adam Dunn and Jason Bay switch teams for the stretch run. The mere sliver of a chance that a walk-year Albert Pujols or Prince Fielder might get dealt if their teams falter will trigger the sexiest trade talk. But more likely scenarios will involve players one tier down, who could be meaningful contributors for contending teams.

Players like Jason Marquis.

Wait, what? This isn’t the same Jason Marquis who threw up a 6.60 ERA and 5.65 FIP in the 58.2 innings in which he wasn’t injured, is it?

That’s the thing, it’s not. The 32-year-old right-hander has become a change-up specialist this season, throwing the pitch 21.5% of the time so far this season — by far the highest frequency of his career. The pitch been spectacularly effective too, worth 4.4 runs through his first five starts of the season.

The results have been impressive. Through 34.1 innings, Marquis owns a K rate of 6.29/9 IP — pedestrian compared to many other pitchers, but still his highest strikeout rate in nine years. His microscopic 0.26 HR/9 IP rate will almost surely go up, with hitters turning just 3.3% of their flyballs against him into homers. Still, Marquis the groundball pitcher (50.1% GB rate for his career) has cranked up his worm-burning this year, posting a career-high 56.7% GB rate.

The biggest change has been in his walk rate: Marquis has never walked fewer than three batters per nine innings in his major league career. He’s at 1.31 BB/9 IP so far in 2011. That’s tied for the third-lowest walk rate in baseball, lower than many notoriously stingy control artists, including Roy Halladay and Cliff Lee.

Unfortunately for Marquis, he’s pitching for a team that’s probably a few Bryce Harper and Stephen Strasburg development years from playoff contention. In the walk year of his two-year, $15 million contract, that makes him prime trade bait this summer.

One team that could be a serious suitor is the Cleveland Indians. As Dave Cameron recently wrote, the Indians’ offense might well be for real. But after Justin Masterson, it’s hard to find a high-upside pitcher anywhere in the rotation. Fausto Carmona has shown flashes of success mixed with major volatility over the years. Josh Tomlin‘s 4-0 record is swell, but his sub-5 strikeout rate, .179 BABIP and 91.7% strand rate scream regression ahead. Carlos Carrasco is Carlos Carrasco.

Marquis will likely face some of the regression issues awaiting the Tribe’s current starters. But there’s also some potentially real skills growth here, as Marquis harnesses his change-up to great effect. He’s been a durable starter throughout most of his career, piling up 32 or more starts five times in the 2004-2009 period. On a team that suddenly finds itself a legitimate playoff contender (a .500 record for the rest of the season would yield 87 wins), getting some known pitching commodities with relatively high floors could offer significant value. With a potentially limited budget, two to three months of Marquis for about $3 million could make all kinds of sense, at a price that won’t include any elite prospects. As a Type B free agent (at best) at year’s end, there’s also little incentive for the Nats to keep Marquis all year.

Expect Chris Antonetti to make some moves this summer. Don’t be surprised if Jason Marquis is one of them.



Print This Post



Jonah Keri is the author of The Extra 2%: How Wall Street Strategies Took a Major League Baseball Team from Worst to First -- now a National Bestseller! Follow Jonah on Twitter @JonahKeri, and check out his awesome podcast.


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
DMCj
Guest
DMCj
5 years 2 months ago

Assuming such a deal goes down, who might us long-suffering Nats fans expect to see in return?

SchoolhouseBalk
Member
5 years 2 months ago

Seriously? For two months of Jason Marquis? They’ll be happy if they get Eric Wedge’s old ’95/’96 “Cavalier Girls” desk calendar.

http://www.nba.com/cavaliers/news/cavalier_girls.html

Not too shabby.

Nick
Guest
Nick
5 years 2 months ago

What does “Carlos Carrasco is Carlos Carrasco” mean? Doesn’t he have some solid potential?

suicide squeeze
Member
suicide squeeze
5 years 2 months ago

Yeah, if anything I would say he’s their highest upside arm of the pitchers who started the year with the team.

Although I do agree that the reflexive property does still apply to him.

kick me in the GO NATS
Guest
kick me in the GO NATS
5 years 2 months ago

Nice idea decently written, but as a Nats fan I would have preferred some speculation on who we could get in return. Talk about a top CF prospect the Tribe could trade and I likely could drool? So, whom can the Indians deal?

Tommy
Guest
Tommy
5 years 2 months ago

You can choose between EZ Carrera and Jordan Henry.

Jason B
Guest
Jason B
5 years 2 months ago

As was stated earlier, the Nats won’t get much of anything of value for two months of a C-level arm. I would go with the desk calendar previously offered, I don’t think any superior offers will be coming down the pike…

Joe V
Guest
Joe V
5 years 2 months ago

Marquis–always a player in the pennant race. Has been for over a decade…

2000-Atlanta
2001-Atlanta
2002-Atlanta
2003-Atlanta
2004-St Louis
2005-St Louis
2006-St Louis
2007-Chicago
2008-Chicago
2009-Colorado

Thats TEN straight years of being on a post-season team. Coincidence, i think not!

The question is what happened to the 2010 Washington Nationals?

Kev
Guest
Kev
5 years 2 months ago

What didn’t happen to the 2010 Nationals?

Beau Zeau
Guest
Beau Zeau
5 years 2 months ago

Marquis is not in the Nats’ plans long-term. He was signed to be an “inning eater” and he’s doing that this year. If he could bring a younger arm or perhaps a very young 1st baseman with an upside, it would be great for the Nats.

NLM
Guest
NLM
5 years 2 months ago

For those wondering what Marquis would net in return… maybe you should take a look back at the Gorzelanny Nats/Cubs deal. It had different circumstances, with Gorzy going to the Nats whereas Marquis will be leaving Washington (under these scenarios)… but it paints a close enough picture. The playing field between Gorzy and Marquis isn’t a huge difference (I realize they’re different pitchers). Being younger, a lefty, and (I think?) cost-controlled a little longer, I’d probably give Gorzy an edge. And the Cubs got shit for him.

So enjoy Eric Wedge’s old Cav calender if anything.

CircleChange11
Guest
CircleChange11
5 years 2 months ago

I absolutely love these guys (Morton, Masterson, Scherzer, Marquis) finding succes with a new approach/speed. Changing speeds, using movement, in the strike zone (except Morton).

Scherzer is top shelf talent, but the rest are having success getting batters to brat the hell out of the grass. Good for them.

Another thread talked about lower run environments. I’m sure there’s various reasons and it is early, but we might see some really low HR/9 rates this year from SP … ala, Jamie Garcia from 2010.

No mention of Marquis’s value as a batter and pinch runner? He really is living the dream.

Cards Fan
Guest
Cards Fan
5 years 2 months ago

Marquis is a whining piece of garbage. It should be noted that he was left off the postseason roster in 2006 when the Cards won the WS and he was healthy. Do teams leave key pieces off the roster in the postseason? No way. Garbage.

NLM
Guest
NLM
5 years 2 months ago

Ha, Cards Fan. Cubs left him off the postseason roster too. For all of the people who mention how many times his team has made the playoffs, they neglect to mention that he’s often not included on the playoff roster…

wpDiscuz