Josh Hamilton: Most Confusing Free Agent Ever?

On Friday, the Rangers season ended, as the team fell to the Baltimore Orioles in the AL Wild Card play-in game. Josh Hamilton, in what will quite possibly be his final at-bat as a Texas Ranger, was booed by the home crowd. From an outside perspective, a break-up seems inevitable. The Rangers — and their fans — seem to just be tired of the Josh Hamilton Experience.

On one hand, the frustration is understandable. Back in May, I wrote a piece noting that Hamilton’s combination of approach and success were historically unique. That he was destroying opposing pitchers while showing the plate discipline of a three-year-old was fascinating. Then opposing pitchers adjusted, they simply stopped him throwing him anything near the plate, and Hamilton went into an epic two month slump. In August, Hamilton rebounded a bit, and he and his coaches both suggested that he’d made the necessary changes to his approach, even though the evidence suggested otherwise.

Not surprisingly, the success didn’t last, and any notion that Hamilton had made any strides with his pitch selection issues were dashed in the final month of the year, as his monthly totals illustrate:


Month PA BB% K% ISO BABIP wRC+
Mar/Apr 96 7% 18% 0.349 0.403 211
May 111 11% 20% 0.438 0.323 202
Jun 107 11% 33% 0.213 0.309 91
Jul 91 9% 23% 0.177 0.175 48
Aug 125 9% 24% 0.265 0.364 148
Sept/Oct 106 9% 35% 0.298 0.320 122

In the final four months of the season, Hamilton struck out 123 times in 429 trips to the plate, a strikeout rate of 28.7%. During that stretch, he hit .245/.322/.487. For comparison, Alfonso Soriano hit .262/.322/.499 this year and only struck out in 24.9% of his plate appearances. While Hamilton blew Soriano away in April and May, the lasting memory of Josh Hamilton to Rangers fans is a four month stretch of baseball where Hamilton was basically Alfonso Soriano. No wonder they’re not banging down the doors to sign up for another five years of that.

And yet, April and May happened too. We can’t just ignore that for the first two months of the season, Hamilton hit .368./.420/.764 and was the best player on the planet. He was the same aggressive swing-at-anything guy then that he’s always been, but he managed to keep his strikeout rate down to just 18.8% and launch 21 homers in 47 games. It obviously wasn’t sustainable, but then again, neither was his July collapse. The truth, as always, lies somewhere in the middle.

And, judged as a whole, Hamilton’s season was actually quite good. He played in 148 games and racked up 636 plate appearances, answering some questions about whether he was too fragile to be an everyday player. In those 148 games, he produced +4.4 WAR, his third straight season posting a +4 win season or better. His 139 wRC+ was slightly higher than his career mark of 135. Even heading into his age-32 season, it’s hard to project him as worse than a +4 win player, and there aren’t a lot of +4 win players just hanging around free agency this year.

Just based on straight production, he’s probably in line for $20-$25 million per year, depending on the length of the deal offered. But, perhaps no premium free agent in recent history came with as many question marks as Hamilton does.

Can he get his strikeout rate back down with his current approach at the plate? Can he learn to stop swinging at pitches two feet off the plate? Is his body up to staying in the outfield, or does he project as a first baseman after another year or two? Do you want to guarantee years beyond age 35 for a guy with a history of addiction?

Hamilton makes Jose Reyes look like a rock of stability, and Reyes had to settle for just $17 million per year even after having a +6 win season at age 28. And, by all accounts, the Mets actually wanted Reyes back. It’s not clear that the Rangers actually do want Hamilton back, given his second half fade and the issues that go along with having him as the foundation of their line-up. And so, it seems like Texas is going to let him see what the market will bear, then decide whether they want to give him a similar deal in order to keep him around. This is the strategy they employed with C.J. Wilson last year, and of course, he ended up in Anaheim.

But, it also seems possible that Josh Hamilton’s market may never develop. This feels a little reminiscent of Andruw Jones after the 2007 season, where Atlanta just tired of his weight gain and underperformance — and he eventually settled for 2/40 from the Dodgers after teams decided that the risks weren’t worth the reward. Jones’ 85 wRC+ that year also had something to do with it, of course, and Hamilton will certainly do better than 2/40, but how much better is something of an open question. His track record and age suggest that a long term deal is probably not a great idea, so even an aggressive suitor is probably going to top out at five years, and there very well may not be an aggressive suitor for Josh Hamilton this winter. The Yankees don’t seem to need him. The Red Sox seem unlikely to take a big bet on another potentially unlikeable player with a big contract. The Dodgers outfield is full. Unless the Tigers fall short in the playoffs and decide to pony up for one more big bat to take a run at a title, it’s hard to find too many situations where a team will be motivated to offer Hamilton a huge contract.

And, if he’s sitting on the market in January without any real options, the Rangers could potentially be his best landing spot. Which, again, brings up the question of whether they even want him back.

I could see Hamilton getting 5/125 from a team that decides to just ignore the risk and land the best offensive player on the market this winter. I could see Hamilton remaining a free agent until January before signing a one year deal somewhere to try and prove that his second half wasn’t a sign of things to come. Like with Hamilton on the field, his free agent outcomes cover the entire spectrum of possibilities. Perhaps that’s only fitting for a guy who and can end a 43-home-run season being booed by his home crowd.




Print This Post



Dave is a co-founder of USSMariner.com and contributes to the Wall Street Journal.


104 Responses to “Josh Hamilton: Most Confusing Free Agent Ever?”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. Zobmie says:

    Typo in the 2nd paragraph “…and simply stopped him throwing him anything near the plate…”

    -14 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Aggie E says:

      Hamilton wont take a walk. he has admitted he does not like it. he wont trust teammates to handle business behind him. Even in an amazing year from Adrian Beltre. not many teams have a cleanup hitter that had a year like Beltre and hamilton still swung at anything. His 1st AB last friday illustrates his last of discipline after Saunders walked Kinsler and then went full count to Andrus with guys at 1st and 3rd and no outs he swings at the 1st pitch and hits in a DP…

      Vote -1 Vote +1

    • snoop LION says:

      typo, account name. “Zobmie”.

      I mean, seriously?

      +27 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • jay says:

      who cares!? it’s not english 101

      -6 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Ryan says:

      For what it’s worth, I stopped expecting articles on Fangraphs to be thoroughly copy-edited a long time ago.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Leslie says:

      My wife cheated on me and i left that c*nt on the road and never turned back. I wanted to get back at her by banging some young hotties, but I had no idea how to approach them or talk to them. A friend of mine suggested i take a try on ~ see???unger”c0m ~ and I signed up a free account there. Now I have a new 27 year old wife (i’m 45). Remember…think like an alpha male and the all women will be attracted to you regardless!!!

      -22 Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Jason B says:

        Yes. What Leslie said.

        For what it’s worth, I really enjoyed your work in Naked Gun, but thought you kind of phoned it in on Creepshow.

        +23 Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Colin says:

    A team giving him 5/125 would have to be absolutely insane at this point. He went a whole year with a complete inability to adjust his approach. If he doesn’t change, it is just going to be more of the past four months for 5 years. Who wants to take that kind of risk for that kind of money?

    +6 Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Zobmie says:

    I don’t think you could fault a GM for going either way on Hamilton. Like you said for a stretch this season he was the best player on the planet. And then he wasn’t. He really really wasn’t.

    If I was a GM I think the combination of his age/health and his tendency to fade in and out production wise would make me shy away from the 5 year deal. One year though? We could talk.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Colin says:

    I’m really not sure where 25 mil a year is coming from either? He’s been a 4 WAR player for two years, even averaging his last 4 years you don’t get 5 WAR and doing a weighted system like Tango’s you don’t get that either. Then you factor in the age change between 27-31 and 31-36 and you really shouldn’t be close to 25 per even if you ignore the change in his approach this year.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • rarumberger says:

      And as we know, WAR is the number one stat for all GMs.

      SOMEONE will look at his triple-crown stats and think they’re getting the second best player in the league – worth 25 mil easily.

      +6 Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Colin P says:

        Not only triple crown stats but also the gap between his best performance and that of the other available free agents.

        When you consider the kind of money that’s been thrown about the last couple of years for hitters due to the increased TV revenue, I think $20-25 M for Hamilton is likely.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. Mike P says:

    God told him to drop the fly ball.

    -27 Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. bradsbeard says:

    I wonder if the Astros would dangle a wad of cash in front of him to make a splash while moving over to the AL and sell some tickets while rebuilding.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • joser says:

      Do they have a wad of cash to dangle? And assuming they did, is this the best use of it for maximizing the “splash”… assuming making a big splash is something they want to do?

      Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Andy says:

      Luhnow seems to know what he’s doing. He’s starting over, and he’s not going to spend a lot of money to bring in free agents to bolster a team that has no hope of contending for several years. I seriously doubt they spend more than $5-10m/AAV on anyone this year, if that.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • bradsbeard says:

        You’re probably right, but there was the whole Roger Clemens bit this season. If Hamilton ends up signing a short term deal to reestablish value, they could comfortably pay him $20 mil for a year or two and still be a bottom tier payroll.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. Doc Milo says:

    Hamilton would look good hitting 4th in Seattle. His aggressive approach would make Hargrove a happy man. He can play LF or RF in Seattle this year and if Smoak doesn’t figure it out in 2013, Hamilton can slide to 1B. 3 or 4 years would be best, if the bidding goes to 5 years, forget about it.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. TKDC says:

    The team will likely regret it, but I would bet he gets $125 million if not a lot more, though perhaps over a greater number of seasons. I see 7/$147. He has too much upside, which is usually the kind of player that gets the greatest overpay.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • BookWorm says:

      I don’t know, “upside” is something that I usually associate with people on the other side of 30 years old.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  9. jpg says:

    Yeah it’s not easy to find a fit. Maybe the Phillies since they unloaded Pence and Victorino and are already pot committed. Then again their middle of the lineup is already lefty heavy with Howard and Utley. Miami could conceivably reinvest the Hanley money in Hamilton since they probably will be aggressive again in free agency to remove the “another fire sale” stigma. Other than those two and maybe Detroit, as Dave mentioned, it’s definitely hard to find a suitor.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  10. Richie says:

    Why is Hamilton suddenly unlikeable?? Because ‘in the know’ baseball people figure he’s in the process of sliding off the wagon? I otherwise don’t understand this part of it.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Richie says:

      I mean, your typical baseball fan has no dislike of free swingers.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • joser says:

        Ask those tens of thousands of typical baseball fans that were booing him in Arlington.

        +6 Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Jason B says:

        Total speculation, but it may be some of the things Dave pointed out in the previous article, and touched on again here – just about everyone recognizes his poor pitch selection but he seems unwilling or unable to make any adjustments at the plate. Seeing him strike out in a high leverage situation on a pitch two feet outside the zone frustrates the fanbase much more than would a hard-hit grounder or a long flyball out, I would imagine.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Brian W. says:

      Why is he unlikeable? Can’t put my finger on it, but I don’t like him.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  11. Richie says:

    Assuming Detroit falls short again, maybe they’ll throw a boatload of money at Hamilton in the latest attempt to buy Ilitch his championship. Is Boras his agent??

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  12. james wilson says:

    Hamilton is the type of player who will find a contract in an organization that does not respect itself much and seeks to fill holes with bigger holes.

    A better solution for both player and team is that Hamilton never sigh for more than one year. Which will of course not happen.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  13. Pfft says:

    Free swinger? Yes! But a better word for Josh is “quitter.”

    -18 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • joser says:

      In the context of addiction, that’s not a bad thing.

      +26 Vote -1 Vote +1

      • t ball says:

        Actually, as an addict, he’s pretty much a free swinger. His addictions of the moment are a bit less harmful, but he still acts like an addict every day far as I can tell. He struggled with giving up chewing tobacco earlier this year, then suffered from vision problems when he drank too much energy drink.

        Josh is a mess and I am sad for him and his family.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  14. Ivan Grushenko says:

    Phillies and Mariners seem like good guesses to me. Orioles, White Sox, Diamondbacks, Pirates, Braves, and Marlins all seem like they could use him.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Westside guy says:

      If he ends up with the Mariners, I bet Wedge – at least once – will refer to his “good approach at the plate”.

      +5 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Ralph says:

      Speaking for the two teams I know: I can’t see the Orioles and Peter Angelos signing an injury prone former junkie, he’s still never gotten over the Albert Belle fiasco. The recent Adam Jones contract is the longest one given out since and its value is still lower than what Hamilton will want. And Jones is 5 years younger, the team leader, and seemed to want to stay in Baltimore long term.

      As for the Pirates, no way one of the smallest markets in baseball commits 1/3 of its payroll to a long term Hamilton signing, it would be suicide. Far too many ways for it to go bad: his stats could crash, or he can’t stay healthy, or, god forbid, he relapses. Any of that happens and the Pirates near contention goes up in smoke when they can’t afford the small dollar pieces they need to fill out a roster.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  15. Rogerb says:

    Before Hamilton. As Mike Fisher called it. The ball park in arlington was refered to as “the picnic grounds in arlington”. He’s the only think that resembled a star since Nolan Ryan. Controversy sells and so does being great
    Its stupid not to at least try to sign him. Of course unless you want to go back to 75wins a year.
    n

    -16 Vote -1 Vote +1

  16. Phantom Stranger says:

    The mainstream coverage I’ve seen of Hamilton’s season this year has been woefully wrong. Yes, pitchers did adjust to his new approach in May and that caused some of the decline. But there were physical problems going on in his swing and in the field. It appears the pressure of a contract year got to him as the season wore on and it became apparent the Rangers weren’t going to re-sign him. His agent obviously told him to go for as many homers and RBIs as you can, forgetting everything else. His approach at the plate this year was nothing like it had been in prior seasons. Look at the K rate and other indicators.

    His idea to go cold turkey on chewing tobacco in the middle of his free agent year was a disaster. I wouldn’t worry too much about signing him if I was an AL team with a DH slot, for the latter years of a potential deal. He’s got the arm to play in Right, though something looked off after June with his arm slot. It looked to me like he was dealing with a pulled ribcage muscle or something that affected his throwing.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • ralph says:

      Speaking of “other indicators” the combination of his O-contact and O-swing numbers is practically unheard of.

      Amongst qualified hitters, he “led” the league in O-Swing% at 45.4%. He backed that up with a O-Contact% of 52.1% (tied with Mark Reynolds for third-worst in the league, with Uggla and Dunn rounding out the trailingboard).

      There’s really no one else particularly close at being that bad in both O-Swing and O-Contact. The closest are Adam Jones (41.3/59.8), Danny Espinosa (40.5/57.0), Trumbo (40.2/56.2), Chris Davis (39.8,56.), Soriano (38.2,57.3), Chris Johnson (37.4, 59.2), and Cespedes (36.5, 59.5).

      Going back to 2011 does show that Miguel Olivo was a qualified hitter who put up pretty similar numbers — 45.6 and 51.2.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Bab says:

        Are you suggesting Hamilton took his batting advice from his agent rather than paid professional hitting coaches?

        If this were true, this would be at least as damaging to Hamilton’s FA opportunities as any other factor mentioned in this discussion.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Matthias says:

        And Miguel Olivo is not someone to whom you want to be particularly similar.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Brian W. says:

      Seriously? In thirty-five years of watching MLB, I don’t recall any players using chew or caffeine as an excuse until Mr. Hamilton came along.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • vivalajeter says:

        When his “I can’t hit during daygames because I have blue eyes” excuse got old, he had to think of something…

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  17. RyanW says:

    Hamilton will avg 30hrs, 100 RBI, campaigns for the next 5 years in his sleep. His physical talent is unmatched by anyone not named Mike Trout, and there are maybe 3 guys in the league that pitchers truly ever fear. The whole lineup is changed with his presence…give me a break, do you think BJ Upton, or Swisher can replace that fear, not to mention the numbers. As volatile as Josh is, would anyone be surprised if he hits 40hrs. .300 next year? Every Big Market can team can afford to over pay for a Premium talent. Overpaying, Risking on a franchise player won’t kill the Rangers with their new TV deal. Not having a franchise type left handed bat on the other hand, puts them below the top teams in baseball without a doubt and into a 1-2 year transition.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Ralph says:

      No one would be surprise if he ended hitting .350 with 50 home runs and 140 RBIs. He has that kind of talent.

      But no one (except you) would be surprised if he spent 130 games on the DL, or perhaps worse, on the restricted list. He spent the better part of a decade abusing his body and mind and once an addict always an addict. And its well documented that even a brief addiction can manifest as hidden health problems years later, and we already know he’s injury prone. Is the risk worth the reward? That’s the question.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • bpdelia says:

        woah. its not “well documented” in fact there is surprisingly little correlation between past drug abuse and health,problems. this whole correlation,between hamiltons 3 years,of addiction (a very small amount,of time compared to most addicts) and his imjuries has always annoyed me. its unscientific.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  18. typos everywhere says:

    “Perhaps that’s only fitting for a guy who and can end”?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  19. Choo says:

    It depends how you define fear. The most intimidating hitters will force a pitcher to throw something they can crush. In that regard, Josh Hamilton is more like the first boss in a video game. The exploitable hole in his armor – soft junk 12 inches off the plate over and over and over again – erases fear from the whole encounter.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  20. jim says:

    i think a good deal for hamilton is something similar to what the dodgers offered fielder. that was, what, 7/$150? front-loaded and with an opt out after 4 years. i see either san francisco or colorado being nice fits for him

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  21. DB says:

    Ask yourself, would you be happy if your team signed him? Pretty much everyone from multiple fan bases that I have asked has said not worth it, no. As an O’s fan he probably fills a giant void, but I wouldn’t want him. Rather find someone else, even with less production. The fans booing him and tiring of him in Texas I think is really telling. Just became unreliable. Someone will pay and get decent production, just hope it’s not my team.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Kate Upton: Fantasy MVP says:

      I’d be pretty ecstatic if the Astros signed him. Paying for Hamilton probably isn’t quite worth his on the field value (although he’s still an elite player), but he’s a great face of the franchise player and he’d probably make back the money in merchandising and additional TV viewership. Indeed, the drama that surrounds him only adds to the headlines and desire to watch him. Also, despite the booing, he’s still super popular here in Texas.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  22. bowie says:

    The SF Giants:
    1) desperately need a slugger (esp a lefty)
    2) are trying to win now
    3) have money
    4) will overpay for free agents (see Zito, Rowand)

    +9 Vote -1 Vote +1

  23. Tom says:

    If the Yankees let Swisher walk… massive 1 year pillow contract.Maybe 1yr/25-30mil?

    Doesn’t impact their 2014 189mil plan, allows them a year to figure out whether some of the lower minor leaguers are actual OF solutions in 2014/2015. Gives Hamilton a year to make some money and set the bar high again – a team like Boston may enter the fray in 2014 (fan unrest if they have another down year?) or the White Sox?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Bill says:

      I don’t like this, but this actually makes a lot of sense. With their massive payroll, the Yankees are likely the only team that can pay Hamilton a mint and still be ok if he gets hurt. They were paying Giambi 20+ million to sit on the DL and they still weren’t strapped for cash. Boston might make a play for him just to prevent him from signing in New York (and to try and keep fans coming to see a last place team).

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  24. j cheatman says:

    The factors to consider are:
    1. Talent – absurdly high
    2. Approach – very poor and at times atrocious
    3. Durability – average to poor
    4. Off the field issues – history of career threatening substance abuse and reports of falling off the wagon last winter.
    5. Likability – mixed bag, at times embraced as a near god (his homerun display at Yankee stadium at all star contest) and booed most recently in playoff game. This seems to be correlated with his recent performance.
    Hamilton is also a player who has better traditional stats than advanced statistics which suggest that there is an incentive for enlightened general managers to pass. Maybe a team like Baltimore would take a flier. I bet he would be better than McLouth. At the correct price he is absolutely too talented to not sign. A one year contract is not going to land Josh Hamilton.
    All the factors above except his superior talent mitigate his value so I would guess he signs for 4 years 109 million. This is a steep discount when one considers other free agents with his resume and talent.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • bowie says:

      Yes, Baltimore does seem like a good bet to woo Hamilton. I can definitely see that happening.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Ralph says:

        Almost no chance of him landing in Baltimore on anything other than a modestly priced 1 year deal, if that. Angelos may have the money but hates big contracts since the Albert Belle fiasco. Hamilton’s history and injury prone reputation should only further discourage signing him. The recent Adam Jones contract is the longest one given out since Belle and its value is still substantially lower than what Hamilton will want. And Jones is 5 years younger, durable, the team leader, and seemed to want to stay in Baltimore long term.

        Coupled with the team already having some success as currently configured. I don’t see them adding the potential production at the cost of an extra ego in the clubhouse and a history of addiction and injury.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Scott says:

        While I agree that Angelos may be somewhat unwilling to repeat the Belle contract, if the O’s fall a bit short in the postseason, the urge to add the mythical “one piece to put them over-the-top” may be too much for him to avoid. Not to mention the hype it would cause in Baltimore. Fans would be likely to come out in droves to see Hamilton and a team that, in many minds (whether true or not), would be seen as a good contender in 2013.

        +5 Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Bill says:

        The Orioles have enough talented outfielders. I imagine they will bring McClouth back to back up Jones, Markakis, and Reimold. They will be looking for a starting pitcher and a second baseman. They may look to upgrade first base, as well, but Hamilton will not be an Oriole.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  25. ChipandDruw says:

    The past two years Hamilton has actually had pretty even home/away splits, which is encouraging.

    Any contract must include playing time targets, as he has played in 150 games just once in his career, as well as salary penalties for addictions.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  26. Doug B says:

    it only takes 1 team (see Prince Fielder and Albert Pujols last season).

    if 5 teams think he’s worth 4/90 with incentives and 1 team think he’s worth 6/170 then guess what he’s going to get…

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  27. Zigs says:

    Elimination game- 0 for 4 with 2 strikeouts on 8 pitches. That is almost as frustrating as the dumb fans booing their best player.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • jim says:

      they booed beltre and darvish?

      +7 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Jason B says:

      I think all astute GM’s will base a potential long-term commitment on how he performed in a single game. Well said.

      GM: “Call Hamilton’s agent, throw out a 8/200 deal and see where it goes from there.”
      Assistant: “Whoa, whoa, slow down. He went 0-for-4 the last game he played! That dude sucks eggs.”
      GM: “Right you are. Let’s see if we can get that Michael Young dude, he went 2-for-4! Now that is a GAMER!”

      +6 Vote -1 Vote +1

  28. JKB says:

    He fills every hole on the Rays except catcher. How about 2/40 and house arrest with an ankle bracelet to come back to Tampa and do Steps 8 and 9 where he makes amends and helps others (win the world series)?

    +9 Vote -1 Vote +1

  29. topher says:

    I wish the Mariner’s would take him and use him in LF. We know Guti will be out with injury. Saunders can be in CF, Hamilton in LF, and Pagan in RF, and Casper Wells as 4th OF. Hamilton can do some DH when Gutierrez is back

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  30. rogerb says:

    My? Is. Is there really someone in ranger front office that’s stupid enough to say “we dont want Hamilton even if he would play for free”. How does Wash walk free. He did some of the worse”on the fly”management I’ve ever seen. I hope Rangers enjoyed the 3 million plus crowd this year. They are about to kill the goose that laid the golden egg.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Bill says:

      I think you people are being overly harsh on hamilton.

      First, how many players on your own team played 150 games? With the crackdown on everything illegal, it’s no wonder that players are looking for that extra ‘juice’, whether it’s caffeine or nicotine. just look at the games in the 50′s, 60′s, 70′s, everyone was chewing or on greenies. Unless you’ve played an entire baseball season you cannot know how absolutely draining it is. You see a game, it looks like fun, and you assume it’s all easy. Games are longer now, 3hrs+, there’s BP, fielding, interviews after, etc. It’s an easy 7-8hrs minimum daily without medical attention included, travel, offseason workouts, etc. 6-7 days a week. And while the game isn’t as physically bruising as hockey or football, just being on your feet daily, running things out, sliding, bumping into walls, getting hit with pitches, the bruises mount up quick even if you avoid the DL. So cut the guy a break about he’s got an addictive personality, most of us do to some degree and he should be commended for even discussing it openly.

      As far as production, he had an off year in several areas. It will probably cost him, but I think a lot of his deal will depend on whether a team thinks he can play CF. For some reason his fielding metric has been all over the map since 08, this past year it was negative which really affected his WAR i’m sure. If I was a GM I would start with 3 years 20mil per with an option based on plate appearances (min 500?). That is where I would start, I wouldn’t go beyond 5 years. He’s worth it.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Jason B says:

        Bill, I think your response is attached to the wrong comment. Roger was defending Hamilton and dissing Washington.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Phantom Stranger says:

        His defense in center was quite acceptable, even good, until this year. He looked much slower cutting off balls and something seemed to be limiting his throwing motion. If he’s healthy, he can play an average CF for the next couple of years in the right park.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  31. kiseey says:

    Now I am seeking someone who can love me and share the passion for speed, so I joined~~~ harleypassions.c o m ~~~under the name of RidingFree. it is the best place for biker men and women or biker women and men to get in touch with each other. if you are interested in it, just check it out.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *