Manny Parra: Brewers Bust Becomes Reliable Reds Reliever

Manny Parra was a phenom-turned-bust with the Brewers. The top-rated pitching prospect in the Milwaukee system in 2008, he battled injuries and inconsistency while logging a 5.12 ERA over five tumultuous seasons. Then he signed with Cincinnati.

Parra has been a reliable reliever since joining the Reds 15 months ago. The 31-year-old southpaw appeared in 57 games last year and struck out 11 batters per nine innings. He’s on a similar pace this season. Health is a big reason for his turnaround, as is a repertoire change. On the suggestion of Bryan Price – at the time the Reds’ pitching coach — Parra ditched his curveball in favor of a slider.

Parra’s relationship with his curveball was every bit as tumultuous as his tenure in Milwaukee. In many respects, it was the curveball that ditched him.

“I lost the feel for my curveball in late 2008, early 2009,” explained Parra. “That really hurt me, because everything else I threw was hard. My fastball was hard and my split was pretty hard. I had nothing to differentiate with, so hitters could get their timing going. If they saw the ball up, they’d let it fly.

“The more I struggled with my curveball, the more I was told to continue throwing fastballs. They said to just trust my fastball, but the more I threw it, the more I got hit. What happened is my lack of command got exposed. I threw enough strikes, but at this level it’s about command and I never had great command of my fastball. I’d always kind of relied on keeping hitters guessing. When I first came up in the minor leagues I was called a 90-mph thumber because I liked to mix it up. Losing that really left me lost.”

Losses followed. Hitters punished Parra, who saw his WHIP balloon to 1.83 in 2009. It was only marginally better in 2010 and 2011. His relationship with his breaking pitch was in serious need of counseling.

“There’s nothing mechanical that’s not also mental,” agreed Parra. “Every move you make starts with your image of it. To me, the two go hand in hand. I feel like I tried everything. A lot of people tried to help me and I worked my butt off to figure it out, but the more I tried the worse it got. Basically, I lost the identity of how I even used to throw.”

Upon divorcing the Brewers, Parra met someone who helped him find a new identity. The result was a parting of ways with his curveball.

“Last year, at the end of spring training, Bryan [Price] and I were talking,” said Parra. “He said he noticed that I accelerate my arm really well, but didn’t really do a whole lot of the manipulation with my curveball. A lot of guys will really try to get around the ball, but when I did that I would get messed up. He wanted me to stay behind the ball and throw a slider, which is mostly like a fastball, only you kind of just throw the outside of it.”

Prior to Price’s intervention, Parra flirted with a pitch similar to a slider. He took a liking to it, but it wasn’t a match made in heaven in the eyes of his old club.

“I started throwing a cutter, but that got axed pretty quick,” explained Parra. “Not by me, but by outside influences. In 2009, I was facing the Pirates and gave up a double on a cutter. I was told not to throw it again.”

Five years later, he’s thriving with the cutter’s cousin. The southpaw is quite fond of his new pitch – he’s throwing it over 40 percent of the time – but memories die hard.

“What’s funny is that my slider looks like a curveball once in awhile, depending on how I release it,” said Parra. “There are times I’ll go. ‘Man, that’s like my old curveball.’ I still have a slider mentality, though.”




Print This Post



David Laurila grew up in Michigan's Upper Peninsula and now writes about baseball from his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He authored the Prospectus Q&A series at Baseball Prospectus from February 2006-March 2011 and is a regular contributor to several publications. His first book, Interviews from Red Sox Nation, was published by Maple Street Press in 2006. He can be followed on Twitter @DavidLaurilaQA


10 Responses to “Manny Parra: Brewers Bust Becomes Reliable Reds Reliever”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. tz says:

    Thanks again David, these articles are always a must-read.

    Hearing about Parra’s change of scenery and repertoire reminded me a lot of Joaquin Benoit and how moving to the bullpen and mastering the changeup turned him into a strong reliever. Then I noted that Eno, coming from a different perspective, listed him as a possible “next Joaquin Benoit”:

    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/who-is-the-next-joaquin-benoit/

    Interesting.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Bobby Ayala says:

    Interesting sub-story here is the apparent ineptitude of the Brewers pitching coaches, repeatedly giving Parra bad instruction. I wonder if that was all Bill Castro?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. James Hogg says:

    Seems like Parra was a victim of the tumultuous post-Mike-Maddux years in Milwaukee — Rick Peterson’s year as pitching coach there was 2009 iirc

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Joseph says:

    The relationship/courting/marriage/etc undertow in this article is absolutely fabulous.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. Steven says:

    Since when is a 4.26 ERA on a 4.35 FIP, -.1 WAR and replacement level projection considered reliable?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Steven says:

      Hey now, I’m the Steven who posts pedantic comments. So either step up your quality of work or change your name. Steven out. Peace.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Bip says:

      That ERA and FIP are inflated entirely due to his inflated 25% HR/FB rate. To give you an idea of the sample size we’re talking about, Parra has allowed 2 homers this year.

      His xFIP, which is much more stable at this point, is 3.11.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. Bip says:

    Interestingly, PitchFX also call his current pitch a curveball. However, in 2013 and 2014, the pitch has been about 5 mph faster and with ~4 inches less vertical drop, so it’s clearly more like a slider than before. I wish I understood better how PitchFX classifies pitches.

    His curveball was never that sharp when it was a curveball, with only about -4 inches vertical movement. For reference, a real knee-buckler will have more than 8 inches of drop, or less than -8 inches of vertical movement. Parra’s curve was more similar in movement to Matt Harvey’s curve, but Harvey throws his in the low-to-mid 80′s. Effective curves tend to be very fast or really big. You don’t see a lot of guys succeed with curve in the mid-70′s with 4 inches of drop.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. August Fagerstrom says:

    Is there something you’d like to tell us, David? Lots of relationship / divorce talk in here. We’re here to help.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>