Mike Newman Prospects Chat – 7/26/12




Print This Post

Mike Newman is currently the owner/operator of ROTOscouting, offering a subscription newsletter focusing on prospects and fantasy baseball. Follow on Twitter, Like on Facebook and subscribe to his YouTube Channel

6 Responses to “Mike Newman Prospects Chat – 7/26/12”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Click here to view comments in a non-threaded output.
  1. Foster says:

    Will Josh Rutledge continue to hit at the big leagues?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Bob says:

    I’m confused, Mike.

    You *like* that Houston is acquiring guys whose freakin’ upsides are “bench” and “bullpen” and “up-and-down-guys”…because, well, ya know, teams need them, too?

    That’s bass-akwards, sir. The Pence-Singleton deal is the kind of deal you make, when you tradeoff talent. The bench, bullpen, and “up-and-down-guys” are the ones you develop or grab off the waiver wire — if you’re a GM worth his NaCl.

    You trade an MLB talent, you MUST get at least a potential #4 starter or 2-WAR regular. Anything less is self-defeating. “Up-and-down-guys” my Aunt Fannie.

    So tell me: Why are you & Breen sucking up so hard to Astro management, anyway?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Simon says:

      You do realise that not everyone that gets traded is good enough to bring in the same sort of package as Hunter Pence?

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. B says:

    Mike, a prospects+fantasy question: How much (if any) does Hamilton’s super-elite speed bump up his value in keeper leagues relative to where he’s been placed on most ‘top prospect’ lists? Does his potential to completely dominate a category elevate him into a class with the likes of Myers, et al?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*