Rick Porcello’s Latest Tease

Sometimes it’s the things you don’t write that make you look smarter. A few weeks ago, I nearly wrote something celebrating Michael Saunders‘ improved plate discipline. I wasn’t quite feeling it, though, so I went and did something else, and then Saunders embarked on a miserable slump. That’s not the first time something like that has happened. Additionally, there were a few times I wanted to re-visit the Rick Porcello narrative, pointing out that his spring-training strikeouts didn’t lead to regular-season strikeouts. I never wrote anything to that effect, and now Porcello is striking guys out. Again, I look smarter by not looking like an idiot. Over the last 30 days, Porcello’s posted baseball’s third-lowest xFIP. Here’s a selection of strikeout rates over the same span:

Tuesday night, Porcello whiffed 11 Pirates over eight innings. That was a career high, besting his previous career high by three. A full 73 times, Porcello has started and struck out three or fewer batters. Porcello didn’t establish a new career high in swinging strikes — for that, we look to May 6, 2012 — but he got plenty, and he generated distinctly un-Porcelloan results.

On April 20, Porcello got torched. Two batters made outs, and nine batters didn’t. To that point, he had three strikeouts in four games. In his next turn, he picked up five strikeouts, but that was against the Braves. In his turn after that, he picked up seven strikeouts, but that was against the Astros. Then the strikeouts kept up, leading through Tuesday. For Rick Porcello, this is new territory. A fairly self-explanatory chart, featuring Jason Marquis:


Porcello’s at 26% strikeouts this May. His May has concluded, presumably. In no other month has he struck out more than 18% of opposing batters. In only five other months has he struck out at least 16% of opposing batters. What we can’t rule out, statistically, is that this is just a fluke. It’s possible. Error bars and everything. But Porcello’s May featured 123 batters. Strikeout rate is a stable stat. This is just asking to be investigated. Rick Porcello’s numbers are different. So, is Rick Porcello different?

The easy joke is that Rick Porcello’s like “**** you defense” after a BABIP-heavy 2012. As a sinker-baller, Porcello’s in a suboptimal situation in Detroit, so he stands to benefit from more strikeouts. Like everyone stands to benefit from more strikeouts. Porcello hasn’t admitted to this, but he also hasn’t said the opposite of this, so the joke lives! And we move on.

In spring training, Porcello picked up 21 strikeouts in 24 innings. This was unlike previous regular season versions of Porcello, and it was also unlike previous spring versions of Porcello, too. At the time, we examined, and we saw that Porcello had all but replaced his slider with a curveball. In the past, Porcello’s slider has let him down, so the curve would give hitters a new look, and it would give Porcello a potential new weapon. We couldn’t just automatically explain everything by pointing to the curve, but Porcello had made a change, perhaps giving his spring numbers a little more substance.

And that’s kept up. Last year, two of every 13 Porcello pitches were sliders, and one of every 27 were curves. This year, one of every 38 have been sliders, and one of every six have been curves. The curve, in other words, has basically replaced the slider, and the slider used to be bad. The curve is slower, giving Porcello greater depth and greater speed variety.

But that isn’t all. And Porcello was throwing the curve in April, when he was considerably less effective. Something happened between April 20 — when Porcello got knocked around — and April 27 — when he didn’t. We turn to Texas Leaguers to examine Porcello’s release points:

Through April 20


Since April 27


Porcello has shifted more toward the first-base side of the rubber, which you can also see in these screenshots:

April 10


May 28


I can’t conclusively prove that this explains Porcello’s turnaround. It’s easy to think of reasons why it might have helped, but it’s also easy to think of reasons why it wouldn’t. This just happens to be a change that correlates to a new level of performance. In the past, Porcello hasn’t often thrown from so far over on the rubber.

Now, importantly, we should look at a split. Porcello has struck out about 14% of lefties. This is more or less on his career average. He’s struck out 24% of righties, which is well above his career average. It’s righties who’ve had the most trouble, and therefore it’s plate appearances against righties we should most closely examine.

Compared to last year, righties have seen a lot more curves, but also a lot more changeups. This is unusual — changeups are thought of as weapons against opposite-handed threats. Righties have gone from seeing 4% changes to 14% changes, and 21% changes in two-strike counts. Porcello’s never done this before, so it seems he has a lot more confidence in his changeup. For the record, this isn’t unprecedented behavior, as Felix Hernandez, for example, throws a ton of changeups to righties, effectively. If it works, it works. General rules don’t have to apply specifically and individually. Porcello, this season, has struck out ten righties with changeups. In all previous seasons combined, he struck out eight righties with changeups. Interestingly, he’s struck out just one righty with a curve. Here’s that curve:


And here’s a righty fishing for a changeup, albeit a pretty bad righty, to be fair:


To summarize:

  • Rick Porcello’s strikeouts are way up
  • against righties
  • especially recently

And there are the following changes:

  • fewer sliders
  • more curveballs
  • more changeups
  • shifted over on the rubber

Porcello hasn’t been afraid to throw the change in any count. He’s liked the curve, but just not with the batter ahead. There are changes to Porcello’s numbers, and they’re backed up by changes to his mix and approach. That makes the statistical changes a whole hell of a lot more interesting, because changes without underlying changes are easily dismissed as flukes. What does Porcello’s future now hold in store? That much we can’t know, because teams will adjust to Porcello’s new self, and then Porcello will have to try to adjust back. Right now, he’s kind of unfamiliar, and he’s thriving. But even if Porcello doesn’t keep striking out as many dudes as Matt Harvey, the increased strikeout rate could definitely be legitimate in part. The slider sucked. The curve doesn’t. It’s hard to fake these strikeouts, and with more strikeouts, suddenly Porcello is all the more valuable.

A few months ago, it looked like Porcello could be traded, and in the meantime he was the weak link of the Tigers’ outstanding starting rotation. Now the Tigers have a complete and more outstanding starting rotation. This is why spring-training stats can be fun. This is why baseball can be fun. This is why you don’t take your eyes off a talented 24-year-old, no matter how certain you are he is what he is.

Print This Post

Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

28 Responses to “Rick Porcello’s Latest Tease”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. Well-Beered Englishman says:


    Here is a linguistic conundrum crying for a solution.

    un-Porcellotic (with stress on penultimate syllable)

    And my favoured nomination, again with altered stress:

    +11 Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Timeghoul says:

    Stats for the Tigers rotation:

    Verlander: 11.18 K/9, 3.14 BB/9, 2.88 xFIP
    Scherzer: 10.67 K/9, 2.11 BB/9, 2.69 xFIP
    Sanchez: 11.19 K/9, 2.38 BB/9, 2.45 xFIP
    Fister: 7.30 K/9, 1.46 BB/9, 3.39 xFIP
    Porcello: 7.06 K/9, 1.76 BB/9, 3.15 xFIP

    And then Smyly who is in the bullpen: 9.19 K/9, 2.59 BB/9, 3.29 xFIP

    Not bad

    +7 Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. bad situation says:

    To “fix” Porcello:

    1. Sent Cabrera and Fielder to fat camp.
    2. Send him to a team with a good infield.
    3. Have Castellanos get switched back to his more natural third base, slide Cabrera to first, and put Fielder at DH.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Kevin says:

      Cabrera isn’t fat, he just isn’t very atheltic.
      Fielder is fat, and he isn’t going to want to play DH. Good luck trying to force him.
      The infield defense leaves a lot to be desired, but everyone knew about this going in. Surprisingly, Miguel has just been a bad third basemen, not one that puts you on suicide watch.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • derp says:

        -27 UZR/150 in 2013, you might as well get the hotline on speed dial.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • bad situation says:

        He’s just big-boned, yes. Just naturally big-boned. He has the same figure as he did when he was a rookie. Or it could be that he has eaten way too many arepas. He’s a great player, but he IS fat.

        270 pounds on a 6’4″ frame is not fat. (He’s listed at 6’5″, I believe, but everybody lies)

        Vote -1 Vote +1

        • grabo says:

          That is obese by any standard. Cabrera is a drunk and he is fat. Big-boned… please. That is a term that women use, not pro athletes.

          -23 Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Vince says:

        Funny – To me, Cabrera is fat, but is amazingly athletic for a fat guy. Potayto, potahto…

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • rotowizard says:

        He is a very bad 3B, small sample size or not. Watching him last night just stare at the suicide squeeze bunt was mindboggling. He used to be able to make all the routine plays, and occasionally snag a ball that some hot corner guys couldn’t. Now it’s to the point where even the routine plays are beyond him.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. MLB Rainmaker says:

    I get we’re talking about a change in stats, and hence looking at what drove that change, but I think its important to note that Porcello’s got a decent fastball, both two- and four-seamer. Yesterday, he was getting a ton of movement on his two-seam fastball, and per the gun on the screen was touching 95.

    In 2012, he was in the top ten in the league in fastball usage, and so far in 2013 has dropped from 68% fastballs to 60% or outside the top 30. Given league-wide fastballs have the highest contact rate, it figures that hitters would make less contact against him, specially since his fastball is good, but not great. Beyond that though, I think the mix change makes his fastball better — changing speeds, changing eye level, all put the hitter off balance.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. gnomez says:

    “Tropic of Marquis” – genius

    +26 Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. byron says:

    Rank in team K% of the teams Porcello faced in the last 30 days: 29, 30, 26, 4, 24, 21. To his credit, he had six K’s in fewer than six innings against the Rangers (4). To his not-credit, he had two K’s in five innings against the Twins (24).

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. Pat says:

    I’ve never seen Porcello pitch like that, probably because he never did. He looked like he had the stuff that was advertised from him in high school. Hard fastball, he was around 93-95 with a nasty curveball. He got away from that to get fasttracked into the majors and it hasn’t really worked.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. Retirenutting says:

    Calling Clint Barmes a “pretty bad righty” is unfair to bad righties across the league.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  9. simple g says:

    Nicely done. I wish all baseball articles were focused toward what you focus on: stating what we know and how we know it, how sure we can be and what to watch for. The discovery process is conducted in the spirit of objectivity.

    Thank you, Jeff Sullivan, for this article and all the other ones like it.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  10. RSquared says:

    Curveballs are the most fun pitches to watch. Two thumbs up to Porcello for increasing my baseball-viewing pleasure

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  11. Dave Hogg says:

    That’s pretty much exactly the same explanation that Porcello has given for his increased strikeout rate – he made adjustments after the April 20 disaster, the curveball has been good and he has the confidence to throw multiple pitches on any count.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  12. awalnoha says:

    When will everybody learn. He is just not good. Every year I keep hearing and reading that this is. This stat means he is getting better. His stuff is so good. Whatever.

    Vote -1 Vote +1