Shutdown Innings

Primarily due to the MLB Extra Innings package and my sheer love of the sport I am a true baseball junkie. I don’t care if it’s the generic Red Sox/Tigers matchup on ESPN or the local feed of a Reds/Nationals game; watching various games helps me connect better with players who would otherwise be nothing more than names on a page. Something that comes with the territory of watching so much baseball is listening to different sets of broadcasters and their terminology or beliefs.

Though many differ in opinion over issues pertaining to clutch hitting, or Barry Bonds, one common weapon in their broadcasting arsenal involves some form of the following phrase: “Well, (insert pitcher) needs to just shut them down this inning to keep the momentum going.”

These assertions generally occur after their team has scored to either a) take the lead, b)tie the game, or c) make a significant effort to come back. Regardless of which takes place, the idea is that momentum has begun its shift into their dugout and, by shutting down the opponent in the following half-inning and preventing them from tacking on more runs, it can sustain its new position.

Hearing about these magical shutdown innings so much made me research which pitchers are truly the best at ensuring a change in momentum is not a fluke. Essentially, I’m defining these Shutdown Innings (SHIP) as any half-inning following one in which the team scores, to bring themselves within a maximum of four runs (ahead or below).

Trailing by nine runs and scoring two would not cause the following half-inning to qualify as a potential shutdown inning; trailing by nine runs and scoring five or six would. On a similar token, leading by one run and then scoring five would not lead to a SHIP; however, leading by one and then scoring two or three would.

Just looking at the National League, for now, I took every pitcher with 41+ innings (the top 25) and scanned their individual game logs to come up with the following top ten:

1) Todd Wellemeyer, 9-9, 1.000
2) Braden Looper, 10-11, .909
3) Scott Olsen, 7-8, .875
4) Ryan Dempster, 11-13, .846
5) Tim Lincecum, 10-12, .833
6) Jake Peavy, 9-11, .818
7) Mark Hendrickson, 13-16, .813
8) Jair Jurrjens, 12-15, .800
9) Dan Haren, 12-15, .800
10) Aaron Cook, 11-14, .786

Wellemeyer and Looper have provided 19 SHIP out of a possible 20. Of these 25 players, the worst three were:

23) Roy Oswalt, 6-11, .545
24) Adam Wainwright, 5-10, .500
25) Brett Myers, 8-16, .500

The next step of this, which I’ll get into later in the week, deals with just how much the failed SHIP attempts (trying really hard to resist a dock or anchor or sea metaphor) effected the teams; some players may be handed a four-run lead and give up just one run whereas others will be given a four-run lead and give up four runs. Shutdown Innings do not tell us which pitchers are better but rather who sustains the momentum discussed by broadcasters most often.

Print This Post

Eric is an accountant and statistical analyst from Philadelphia. He also covers the Phillies at Phillies Nation and can be found here on Twitter.

5 Responses to “Shutdown Innings”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. This kind of feels like a holds type of stat for starting pitchers. Do you think -4/+4 runs is too loose a criteria? At the start of any inning with a +4/-4 score differential the leverage index is always below 1, which suggests there shouldn’t be much pressure on the pitcher. You only start to get LIs above 1 at the -3/+3, and then it’s also only with the lead.

    Pitching from behind leaves you with a much lower LI than pitching with the lead, which says pitchers have way more to lose when trying to hold a lead than they do when trying to keep the game close.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Eric Seidman says:

    Oh, I’m not married to it. It could definitely be reduced to +-3 instead of 4. I have heard numerous announcers make the assertion that once the team either creeps back into the game or slowly inches in the lead direction that the pitcher really needs to come out and shut the team down. This is just attempting to represent that in stat form. It could even be broken up into SHIPs when trailing and when leading.

    The major reason I started it at 4 is that the most recent game in which I heard this mentioned involved a team trailing by four and then hitting a 3-run homer. The announcers eluded to the fact that it would be imperative for the pitcher to shut the team down in the following inning to maintain the momentum.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Tim Daloisio says:

    I would also love to know how the SHIP inning compares to any other innings that pitcher throws? Is it a greater pattern on just these type of innings?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Eric Seidman says:

    Well the thing with these SHIP is that it really depends on the offense. If a team doesn’t score than subsequent innings won’t qualify. And then there are run support situations wherein a team will trail 1-0 and score 6-7 runs in an inning; even though they came back and provided plenty of run support, the lead wouldn’t enable a half-inning to be a SHIP.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. Michael Scotto says:

    What if the next inning the guy faces 7-8-9 (particularly in the NL). Is that really a SHI or just luck? The Phillies score a chunk of their runs in bunches by the HR… I’m sure they are “shut down” a lot in between those run explosions (as the Dodgers are discovering).

    It strikes me as a somewhat tortured stat. I’m not sure of what value it is… but being a baseball junkie myself… I’M HOOKED TO THE ANALYSIS!

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>