The AL West from ’08 to ’09

Instead of going team by team this off season, I will review the divisions as a group. And whereas last year, I used a version of BaseRuns, with some modifications for strength of schedule and the like thrown in, to determine the ranking of teams’ true talent levels, this year I will use WAR as provided here on FanGraphs.

Part Five: The AL West

The ranks last year were Anaheim (13th), Texas (17th), Oakland (20th) and Seattle (28th). Clearly not a strong division in 2008. A lot of changes took place over the winter between 2008 and this past season. The Mariners cleaned house in the front office, the Rangers embraced defense and the Angels shifted from a run prevention focus to a run scoring one. The Athletics gambled on retread veterans, a rotation from Double-A and an out of left field trade for Matt Holliday.

In the end, the division as a whole, one predicted to be evenly mediocre, turned in a vast improvement over the year prior. Every team improved their relative rank. The Angels once again led the way and, with 46 WAR, were fourth in baseball, a legitimately great team this season. The Rangers stayed in second place in the division and moved into the top ten in baseball with 41 WAR, ranked 9th.

The Mariners edged the Athletics for third place, with their 37 WAR moving them all the way to 14th. Oakland was not far behind, though, at 36 WAR and 15th in baseball. The entire division finished in the top half of teams in 2009.

As previously mentioned, each team focused on new areas in 2009 and, amazingly, all those focuses worked out. The Mariners’ re-tooling around defense gave them baseball’s best. The Rangers’ similar moves netted them the 6th best defense and promotion of youngsters into the bullpen contributed to one of the league’s better units.

It wasn’t as good as the Athletics’ bullpen, though, which blew away everyone in the league. And the Angels’ focus on offense resulted in the third-best hitting squad in baseball. In the end, the WAR standings matched the actual won-loss standings for 2009. Here’s a summary of the ranks for the AL West teams, with 2008 first:

ANA: 13, 4
TEX: 17, 9
OAK: 20, 15
SEA: 28, 14




Print This Post



Matthew Carruth is a software engineer who has been fascinated with baseball statistics since age five. When not dissecting baseball, he is watching hockey or playing soccer.

4 Responses to “The AL West from ’08 to ’09”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. CedarA says:

    AL West is looking really strong in ’10 also, Mariners made some solid acquisitions, Rangers acquired a few more pieces and without losing too much, Angels are looking a little bit weaker but could still easily win 85+ games, Oakland isn’t there yet but they have a very solid young team that could and should be even better next year.

    AL West will probably be the most exciting division in baseball next year.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. kds says:

    In a discussion in another thread it was concluded that to correctly evaluate a relief pitcher’s WAR one should not give full credit for high leverage due to chaining. Essentially, leverage applies as a team statistic.

    This suggests to me that in figuring team WAR full value should be given to leverage, not just adding together the individual WAR figured with partial credit for leverage.

    I think there would be something similar for pinch hitters. Not that there are many pure pinch hitters in these days of 12 and 13 member pitching staffs.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. stolenbases says:

    Looks like a 3 team race between LAA, Seattle, and Texas. Should be an exciting AL West race this year if most of the key players on each team stays healthy.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. BX says:

    I see the AL West as 4 above average teams.

    The A’s are, as of now, the weakest team in the division, but I still see the entire West as being better, at least via WAR and Pythag if not actual records, than 3-4 teams in the AL Central. If they were to sign Beltre and a DH, things could get interesting.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current day month ye@r *