The Brewers’ Healthy, Stealthy Starting Rotation

The Milwaukee Brewers have been one of the best stories of the season’s first half. They were picked by virtually no one to win the National League Central, and though it’s far too early for any hardware to be awarded, there are reasons galore for the club’s success to date. The team is exceptionally strong up the middle, offensively and defensively, thanks to the cost-controlled group of Jonathan Lucroy, Jean Segura, Scooter Gennett and Carlos Gomez. Their lineup is balanced and strong, with five players between 11 and 14 home runs and between 40 RBI and 49 RBI entering Monday night’s action. They also are quite athletic, with above-average team speed and defense; plus the bullpen has been effective all season. Their stealth strength, though, just might be their healthy, durable starting rotation that has a very good chance to boast five ERA qualifiers this season — a trait that’s much more central to winning than you might think.

All but one of the Brewers’ games this season have been started by the five men in their season-opening rotation: Kyle Lohse, Matt Garza, Yovani Gallardo, Wily Peralta and Marco Estrada. Barring injury or a performance flameout, Milwaukee seems to be on track to have five ERA-title qualifiers this season, with Estrada — the guy with the lowest innings total to date — only 60 innings away from qualification. How often do clubs reach this benchmark, and what might it mean for their seasonal team performance? Below is a list of all of the clubs with five ERA qualifiers, going back to 2000.

YR TM WINS #1 IP #2 IP #3 IP #4 IP #5 IP
2013 DET 93 Verlander 218.33 Scherzer 214.33 Fister 208.67 Sanchez 182.00 Porcello 177.00
2012 CIN 97 Cueto 217.00 Latos 209.33 Bailey 208.00 Arroyo 202.00 Leake 179.00
2012 SF 94 Cain 219.33 Bumgarner 208.33 Vogelsong 189.67 Lincecum 186.00 Zito 184.33
2011 TEX 96 Wilson 223.33 Lewis 200.33 Holland 198.00 Harrison 185.67 Ogando 169.00
2010 TB 96 Price 208.67 Garza 204.67 Shields 203.33 Niemann 174.33 Davis 168.00
2008 LAA 100 Santana 219.00 Saunders 198.00 Garland 196.67 Weaver 176.67 Lackey 163.33
2006 CWS 90 Garcia 216.33 Garland 211.33 Buehrle 204.00 Vazquez 202.67 Contreras 196.00
2005 CLE 93 Westbrook 210.67 Lee 202.00 Sabathia 196.67 Millwood 192.00 Elarton 181.67
2005 STL 100 Carpenter 241.67 Marquis 207.00 Mulder 205.00 Suppan 194.33 Morris 192.67
2004 BOS 98 Schilling 226.67 Martinez 217.00 Wakefield 188.33 Lowe 182.67 Arroyo 178.67
2004 OAK 91 Mulder 225.67 Zito 213.00 Redman 191.00 Harden 189.67 Hudson 188.67
2004 STL 105 Morris 202.00 Marquis 201.33 Williams 189.67 Suppan 188.00 Carpenter 182.00
2003 ATL 101 Maddux 218.33 Ru.Ortiz 212.33 Hampton 190.00 Ramirez 182.33 Reynolds 167.33
2003 SEA 93 Moyer 215.00 Franklin 212.00 Pineiro 211.67 Garcia 201.33 Meche 186.33
2002 BOS 93 Lowe 219.67 Martinez 199.33 Burkett 173.00 Castillo 163.33 Wakefield 163.33
2002 SF 95 Hernandez 216.00 Ru.Ortiz 214.33 Rueter 203.67 Schmidt 185.33 Jensen 171.67
2001 LAA 75 Rm.Ortiz 208.67 Schoeneweis 205.33 Washburn 193.33 Rapp 170.00 Valdez 163.67
2000 STL 95 Kile 232.33 Stephenson 200.33 Hentgen 194.33 Ankiel 175.00 Benes 166.00
AVG 95

That’s a total of 18 clubs with five ERA qualifiers in 14 seasons, or a little more than one team per year. Every year is represented on the list except 2007 and 2009. Thus far in 2014, only the Brewers are on track to join the fraternity, though the Dodgers will join them as soon as Clayton Kershaw‘s innings total reaches qualification status.

The most amazing thing about this group of clubs appears in the “wins” column. Seventeen of these 18 teams won 90 or more games in the season in which they had five or more ERA qualifiers. That’s far too high a percentage to be a fluke. These clubs averaged 95 wins, and cracked the 100-win barrier four times. The one club that failed to win 90 games, the 2001 Angels, was a massive outlier, winning only 75. But that club turned over 60% of its rotation and won the World Series the next season.

Perusing the list of names comprising the 18 rotations above, you find a whole lot of league average-ish pitchers: Jon Garland, twice. Jeff Suppan, twice. Bronson Arroyo, twice. The winningest team on the list rolled out Suppan, Jason Marquis and Woody Williams for about 60% of their contests. Mark Redman, Ryan Franklin, Scott Elarton — even Garrett Stephenson, Ryan Jensen and Frank Castillo — the gang’s all here. These are not superstar rotations. In fact, the vast majority of them feature two qualities above all else: competence and health. Rolling out your relatively unexciting, near league-average No. 5 starter 30 or more times isn’t sexy, but it beats the heck out of running out Nos. 6, 7, 8 or even 9. Ask the 2014 Texas Rangers how that’s working out.

On the surface, the Brewers group appears to be somewhat vanilla, giving the club some length innings-wise while pitching to contact more often and issuing free passes less often than your average rotation. Let’s take a closer look at the five hurlers’ 2014 plate-appearance outcome frequency and production by BIP type data to see how they get it done. First, the frequency information:

FREQ – 2014
Estrada % REL PCT
K 20.5% 101 41
BB 7.8% 99 57
POP 14.0% 182 99
FLY 35.7% 128 99
LD 19.2% 92 10
GB 31.1% 71 1
———– ———- ———- ———-
Gallardo % REL PCT
K 18.0% 89 19
BB 6.7% 85 47
POP 4.5% 59 7
FLY 28.6% 102 69
LD 17.2% 83 1
GB 49.7% 114 91
———– ———- ———- ———-
Garza % REL PCT
K 18.4% 91 22
BB 7.4% 94 54
POP 9.8% 127 87
FLY 27.5% 99 58
LD 19.8% 95 16
GB 42.9% 98 28
———– ———- ———- ———-
Lohse % REL PCT
K 17.8% 88 19
BB 4.7% 59 13
POP 9.1% 118 85
FLY 31.1% 112 86
LD 19.8% 95 16
GB 39.9% 92 21
———– ———- ———- ———-
Peralta % REL PCT
K 17.7% 87 18
BB 6.2% 78 35
POP 6.7% 87 45
FLY 22.3% 80 2
LD 20.4% 98 28
GB 50.6% 116 92

Estrada has been the least successful member of the Brewer rotation this season, but you can’t tell from his frequency distribution. He is one of the most extreme popup/fly ball pitchers in the game today. The popups are a very good thing. His 2014 popup percentile rank of 99 is not a new development. His 13.6% popup rate ranked second to Oakland’s A.J. Griffin among 2013 ERA qualifiers. His fly ball percentile rank of 99, on the other hand, presents a significant amount of risk, as we’ll see in the next table. With so many popups and fly balls, his grounder percentile rank (1 in 2014) is obviously going to be quite low. His low liner rate (10 percentile rank) appears ripe for regression, however, as it had been above MLB average in two of the previous three seasons.

Gallardo’s frequency profile is interesting, with some significant trends in process. As recently as 2012, he had a K-rate percentile rank of 89, and that was his lowest since 2009. It now stands at 17, which means his days as a big strikeout guy might be over. On the positive side, his walk percentile rank of 47 is his second best since 2009, and he has evolved into a fairly extreme ground ball generator, with a 2014 percentile rank of 91. That’s far higher than his previous best of 76 in 2012. There are more negatives, though: He never induces a popup, as his percentile rank in that category has been in single digits for three consecutive seasons. Lastly, don’t believe in his very low 2014 liner rate (1 percentile rank). Gallardo’s liner rate has swung very high to very low from season to season, and his 2014 performance likely is not reflective of a true skill.

After six straight seasons with above MLB average K rates, Garza has seen his percentile rank drop to 22 in this category. He has always possessed a fly ball tendency, but in 2014, they have been hit higher than in previous years, as his popup percentile rank has spiked to 87, his highest since 2008. Like Estrada and Gallardo, however, Garza’s 2014 liner percentile rank is very low (16) and does not appear to be reflective of a true skill, as it has been 70 or higher in three of the previous four seasons. Garza’s liner rate also appears poised for some regression.

Lohse is the purest pitch-to-contact guy of the group, with K and BB percentile ranks of 19 and 13, respectively. Like Estrada – though not as extreme – and to a lesser extent Garza, Lohse is a popup/fly ball generator, and his 85 and 86 percentile ranks in those categories are his highest going back to 2008. Once again, however, his liner percentile rank of 16 is quite low compared to his track record, and appears due for some near-term regression.

Peralta is yet another pitch-to-contact hurler, and his most positive 2014 development has been the significant decline in his walk rate — from a 2013 percentile rank of 82 to a 2014 percentile rank of 38. He’s evolving into a fairly extreme ground-ball generator, as his percentile rank in that category has climbed from 77 in 2013 to 92 this year. His liner rate is also well below MLB average (28 percentile rank), though it’s too early in his career to determine whether this is a skill or a fluke.

As a group, the Brewer starters don’t hurt themselves with walks, but they also don’t miss a lot of bats. The most interesting observation gleaned from the frequency tables might be the low liner rates generated in the season’s first half, and the potential regression that could loom as we head down the stretch.

Next, let’s look at the production by BIP type allowed by all five pitchers this season, both before and after adjustment for context:

PROD – 2014
Estrada AVG OBP SLG REL PRD ADJ PRD ACT ERA CALC ERA TRU ERA
FLY 0.324 1.078 182 129
LD 0.655 0.891 101 103
GB 0.236 0.258 95 91
ALL BIP 0.316 0.643 126 109
ALL PA 0.244 0.304 0.496 119 105 4.94 4.52 3.97
————- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———-
Gallardo AVG OBP SLG REL PRD ADJ PRD ACT ERA CALC ERA TRU ERA
FLY 0.273 0.716 96 111
LD 0.642 0.811 91 118
GB 0.229 0.235 85 87
ALL BIP 0.303 0.459 86 100
ALL PA 0.241 0.296 0.365 88 100 3.45 3.32 3.79
————- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———-
Garza AVG OBP SLG REL PRD ADJ PRD ACT ERA CALC ERA TRU ERA
FLY 0.204 0.473 46 67
LD 0.687 0.910 108 88
GB 0.228 0.255 91 76
ALL BIP 0.290 0.428 77 74
ALL PA 0.232 0.289 0.343 81 78 3.78 3.07 2.96
————- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———-
Lohse AVG OBP SLG REL PRD ADJ PRD ACT ERA CALC ERA TRU ERA
FLY 0.221 0.540 58 72
LD 0.639 0.875 96 106
GB 0.234 0.248 91 121
ALL BIP 0.288 0.442 79 96
ALL PA 0.234 0.270 0.358 78 93 3.18 2.94 3.51
————- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———- ———-
Peralta AVG OBP SLG REL PRD ADJ PRD ACT ERA CALC ERA TRU ERA
FLY 0.329 0.973 161 126
LD 0.612 0.761 81 99
GB 0.265 0.271 114 101
ALL BIP 0.327 0.502 101 98
ALL PA 0.264 0.311 0.404 101 97 3.35 3.84 3.69

The actual production allowed by each hurler on each BIP type is indicated in the AVG and SLG columns, and is converted to run values and compared to MLB average in the REL PRD column. That figure is then adjusted for context, such as home park, team defense, luck, etc., in the ADJ PRD column. In the three right-most columns, the actual ERA, calculated component ERA based on actual production allowed, and “tru” ERA, which is adjusted for context, are all presented. For the purposes of this exercise, SH and SF are included as outs and HBP are excluded from the OBP calculation.

Estrada has obviously been hammered in the air this season, allowing 26 homers already, and a hefty REL PRD figure of 182 on fly balls. That matches the MLB-leading mark posted by Edinson Volquez in 2013. Like Volquez, though, adjustment for context works wonders: Miller Park is fly-ball-friendly, and Estrada has allowed more than his share of less than solidly hit homers this season. His fly ball ADJ PRD figure of 129 will still rank near the top of the league but it is at least survivable. His liner and grounder authority allowed (percentile ranks of 91 and 103) are in the league-average range. His ADJ PRD on all BIP — his “adjusted contact score” — is within hailing distance of league average at 109. His “tru ERA” of 3.97 is about a full run better than his actual mark. He’s allowing top-of-the-scale homer totals, but he is still viable, thanks primarily to his massive popup rate.

Gallardo, on the other hand, has been fairly fortunate on balls in play this season, as his ADJ PRD is higher than his REL PRD on all BIP types. Though his REL PRD — his unadjusted contact score — is a solid 86, it is adjusted upward for context to 100, which is exactly league average. His near league average K and BB rates don’t move the needle at all, and his “tru” 3.79 ERA matches the current MLB average.

Garza, despite possessing the second highest actual ERA of the group, is clearly the Brewers’ best starter this season. He has done an exceptional job suppressing fly ball authority — his REL PRD of 46 and ADJ PRD of 67 on flies would have ranked at the elite level among 2013 ERA qualifiers. He has allowed better than league-average liner and grounder authority, and his adjusted contact score of 74 would have led the NL in 2013. His slightly subpar K and BB rates bump his overall ADJ PRD up to 78, but his “tru” ERA is quite strong at 2.96, 0.82 lower than his actual mark.

Lohse has suppressed fly ball contact nearly as well as Garza, with an ADJ PRD of 72 on flies. Lohse has allowed harder than league-average line drive and grounder contact (ADJ PRD of 106 and 121), and his unadjusted contact score of 79 is therefore adjusted upward from 79 to 96 for context. His very low BB rate drops his overall ADJ PRD down to 93, for a “tru” ERA of 3.51, a bit above his actual 3.18 mark.

Peralta doesn’t allow that many fly balls, but the ones he does allow are hit quite hard, as his ADJ PRD of 126 on flies is in Estrada territory. His liner and grounder ADJ PRD figures are squarely in the league-average range, and his high grounder rate allows him to post an overall adjusted contact score of 98 despite the hard fly ball contact. His near average K/BB performance barely changes his overall ADJ PRD figure to 97, for a “tru” ERA of 3.69 that is a bit above his actual 3.35 mark.

The one thing that is hard to discern from the table above is the impact of each pitcher’s low liner rate upon their “tru” ERAs. Upward regression of their liner rates would push their “tru” ERAs upward, so mentally adjust those marks marginally going forward. Still, what we have here is a group of average to slightly above average starting pitchers, with Garza potentially a bit better than that. Call Garza a #2-3 starter, Lohse/Peralta/Gallardo #3-4 starters, and Estrada a #4. Peralta is trending up, Gallardo down, the others are what they are. They lack a true ace, but if you can run out five #4 or better starters every single day over a 162-game season, you’ve got something, and have a decent chance of extending your season into October.

So what happens when October rolls around? Well, only two of the 18 clubs with five ERA-qualifying starters since 2000 have won it all. Starting rotation depth matters a lot less in the postseason, when rotation top-heaviness matters a whole lot more. Still, getting there is the first and hardest step in the process. The Brewers have many strengths, but the team also has weaknesses that could bite them at some point. Chief among them is a lack of upper-level depth that could become an issue if injuries strike any of the team’s four or five top regulars, any rotation member or one of the back-end relievers. The Cardinals, Pirates and Reds are all lurking, and they likely have the Brewers beat when it comes to roster spots 26 through 35. Still, regression does not impact the lead the Brewers already have or the stats they’ve already compiled. They are in a strong position for the rest of the season, due in large part to a steady but unspectacular band of starting pitchers, men who are more akin to bass players than lead singers or guitarists.




Print This Post





17 Responses to “The Brewers’ Healthy, Stealthy Starting Rotation”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. Jimmy Nelson says:

    You forgot about me.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. leon says:

    Has Lohse ever been investigated for employing some type of voodoo magic that allows him to consistently outperform his periphs?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • tz says:

      He’s on a 3 1/2 year run of ERA < (x)FIP and lower BABIPs, but earlier in his career it was the opposite.

      His batted ball types are consistent over time, so the balls in play haven't shifted. The only thing that's changed from 2011 on is he's walking fewer and striking out more batters. Since both of those factor into FIP, I guess he's just on the lucky end of the normal curve.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. munchtime says:

    The Brewers do have one, possibly two, starting pitchers in AAA right now that could be worthy of the #5 role. Its been a topic of discussion with Brewer fans if Estrada should transition back into the bullpen and call up Jimmy Nelson (who is currently blowing away AAA competition). If Mike Fiers can control his HR rate, he could also be solid at the back end of the rotation. He was good in 2012, not so good in a short stint in 2013.

    MiLB depth for the bullpen or fielders is an entirely different story. Look at how many ABs have gone to the likes of Elian Herrera and Jeff Bianchi…

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Ty Webb says:

    One of them needs to hurry up and bust a UCL so Jimmy Nelson can finish ’14 with 12 starts for my Strat team. I’m banking on you, Matt Garza.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. Beavers says:

    Matt Garza sucks

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. Jonathon Lucroy says:

    My new hidden skill is depressing line drive rates for my pitchers.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. T. Bear says:

    Is it possible the consistently across-the-board low line drive rates reflect on Lucroy, management, and the pitch selection? Seems to be a common thread among all five starters. Just a thought.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Zak says:

      In 2013, the Brewers pitching staff was among the worst staff in giving up line drives. So I’d say its probably due to luck, though its odd that the entire staff is lucky I guess.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. Mr Scout says:

    Yea, the sample across 5 pitchers is not small. I remember stats guys used to scoff at catcher defense and receiving skills being important. Lol

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>