The Fish and Blalock

Matt Klaasen has written the most about Hank Blalock this year. In January he wrote:

Hank Blalock: -3 hitting, -2 fielding = 0.3 WAR. Do you really think Blalock’s going to play 150? Six years ago, it seemed like he and Mark Teixeira would be torching the AL West for years to come. Tex is a superstar in pinstripes, while Blalock looks like he’s done. I’d say he’ll be lucky to get a major-league deal, but you never know.

And in February:

Hank Blalock
Career Split: 21.8% (1060 PA v LHP)
Regressed: 15.4%
CHONE projected wOBA: .328
Estimated wOBA vs. RHP: .342
Estimated wOBA vs. LHP: .291

It may seem like Hank Blalock was good just a couple years ago, but it’s really been six. He has even a bigger split than Delgado, but he’s also not as good of a hitter in general. A .342 wOBA part-time DH can be useful, but not often.

With that in mind, here’s the book on Blalock: He’s an above average hitter against right-handed pitching and a sub-par fielder at either corner base with a history of injuries who figures to come pretty darn cheap*. Naturally, the Marlins and Rays are reportedly interested. Since the Marlins still play in the National League, Blalock figures to be under consideration as a first baseman. The Fish’s first base depth chart looks like this:

Gaby Sanchez
Jorge Cantu
Wes Helms
Logan Morrison

Cantu figures to start at third and Morrison is probably going to the minors for a little more seasoning, which leaves Sanchez and Helms as the main competition. That means Sanchez is the Marlins’ first baseman. Here’s where it gets interesting though. If the Marlins really want to maximize on the margins, then adding Blalock and placing him in a platoon with Sanchez could make sense. Minor League Splits has Sanchez with a 1.000 OPS against lefties in 469 at-bats and a .824 OPS in 1,288 at-bats versus righties.

Those splits obviously will not translate on a 1:1 basis to the majors and those numbers are unadjusted and spread across various leagues and hitting environments. The question the Marlins have to answer is this: Does Sanchez have any more room for development? It’s a simple cost-benefit analysis. The cost in adding Blalock is (possibly) negatively affecting Sanchez’ development, while the benefit is helping the overall team dynamic.

Given that the Marlins have already offered Blalock a minor league deal, maybe they’re just trying to get the best of both worlds.

*As an aside, Blalock bears resemblance to a certain other left-handed former third baseman. One who I’ve mentioned far too much this week already, but here we go again. Blalock stacks up pretty well to Eric Hinske. Check out how they match up across the WAR components since 2002:

Batting:
Hinske: 15.7
Blalock 14.1

Fielding:
Hinske: -3.4
Blalock: -13.9

Replacement
Hinske: 117.4
Blalock: 128.6

Positional
Hinske: -22.1
Blalock: -7.8

So Hinske played positions of less defensive importance, but played them better. He also played a little less and hit a little better.



Print This Post





Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
tdp992
Member
tdp992

I don’t think Florida cares at all about disrupting Gaby’s development, last year they frequently called him up from AAA just to be used as a pinch hitter every now and then. If they thought a Blalock/Gaby platoon would work well I don’t think that issue would stand in the way of it.

And considering we have Dominguez/Morrison waiting to take over the corners, it’s probably the right mindset too.

Michael
Member

Exactly what I’ve thought as well. The Marlins should not be worried about Sanchez’ development, but rather about winning (or at least trying to) this season. To that end, I think Blalock would be a good pickup, but given his injury history, there’s not a very strong chance that he sticks as the big half of a platoon. Rather, I’d imagine he gets about 35-40% of the playing time. Still would be a pretty decent move for a minor league deal.

wpDiscuz