The Position Battle That Isn’t: Third Base in Oakland

It is to say nothing new or bold to note that spring-training stats and performances are to be regarded as one might regard a neighborchild holding a pair of tweezers for no discernible reason — which is to say, with suspicion.

There is, first of all, the issue of limited sample size (which leaves authors like the present one performing regression gymnastics). Beyond that, spring training offers a wider variation in the level of competition. One could, for example, face Roy Halladay and then both Austin Hyatt and B.J. Rosenberg in the same game, producing a 2-for-3 effort even after a three-pitch strikeout against the major leaguer of that group. Finally, there is also the question of player intent. As was noted on Twitter recently (by whom, I’ve unfortunately forgotten), Barry Bonds posted a 2:13 BB:K in 45 at-bats during the 2007 edition of spring baseball — before producing a 89:54 UIBB:K ratio that season. There’s reason to believe that Bonds, as many veterans are likely to do, was experimenting with this or that part of his game.

Now, with all of those reasonable statements stated, allow me to submit one that is slightly less so (although only by a little) — namely that, for players who are competing for their baseballing lives, spring-training performances are a relevant piece of the overall information puzzle.

The Oakland A’s, at the very least, seem to think this is the case, as — in a development that approaches Dewey-defeats-Truman levels of notability — manager Bob Melvin has announced that he has no announcements to make regarding the team’s starting third baseman, even with Oakland’s season opener in Japan now less than a week away.

When would-be starter Scott Sizemore suffered a torn ACL at the end of February, it appeared as though Josh Donaldson was the immediate favorite to replace him. Indeed, Donaldson has not only made the majority of starts at third base for Oakland this spring, he actually leads all spring batters in innings played, with 118 (note courtesy Jane Lee of MLB.com, linked above).

Except, things have gone poorly for Donaldson, offensively speaking. In 52 at-bats, he has a 5:14 BB:K and no home runs, which places him at about the 10th percentile of spring batters in terms of expected offensive production. Meanwhile, Eric Sogard has played his way into consideration at third base, posting a 5:4 BB:K while hitting two home runs — an effort that places him at roughly the 95th percentile of all spring offensive performances.

The spring numbers aren’t to be regarded in a vacuum; they do, however, augment what information we already possess about the players in question. Sogard has posted roughly equal walk and strikeout totals throughout the minors. That he’s doing so this spring is unsurprising — and that he could at least come close to doing so in the majors is a possibility. Donaldson, for his part, has generally posted average-ish walk and strikeout rates, while showing more power than Sogard — albeit much of the latter showing up in both the California and Pacific Coast Leagues, which are hitter-friendly.

Of course, all of this discussion is to ignore the final point — that the necessity of naming an Opening Day starter exists at all. If the A’s think that Donaldson and Sogard are more or less equally valuable as third basemen — Donaldson showing more with his power; Sogard, with his glove (which is probably a marginal plus at third base) and contact ability — then there appears to be a real chance that they could form a functional platoon, with the left-handed Sogard taking the strong side of same.

In fact, given their respective versatility, Sogard and Donaldson are uniquely suited to a platoon arrangement, with Sogard profiling as a plus defensive sub (when he’s not in the starting lineup) at basically every position but shortstop, and Donaldson capable of serving as a third catcher or able pinch-hitter against left-handed relievers.

In the final analysis, the A’s are likely to benefit from expressly not naming a full-time starter, but instead by allowing two useful pieces to play roles that maximize their respective values. Sogard and Donaldson are likely not the solution for a championship-caliber club. But a platoon of the two is probably an ideal arrangement for the current iteration of the A’s.




Print This Post

Carson Cistulli says terrible things at The New Enthusiast.

7 Responses to “The Position Battle That Isn’t: Third Base in Oakland”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Click here to view comments in a non-threaded output.
  1. GoGoMrPoPo says:

    Italics are the new quotation marks, Carson.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Ken Arneson says:

    Things haven’t been going so great for Donaldson defensively speaking, either. He’s still learning 3B, and it has been rather obvious that he’s still pretty raw there.

    If the A’s are going to platoon, I wonder if it isn’t better to let Donaldson play 3B every day in Sacramento for a month or two, and let Sogard and Rosales platoon, instead. If the Sogard/Rosales platoon doesn’t work, then you can call up Donaldson when he’s a little more ready defensively, and give him the job full-time.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Maybe it helps force their way into Santa Clara county if the As load their roster with the low-pay talent. With that in mind (and Aramis & Zimmerman’s contracts knocking on mind’s door) either of Sogard, Donaldson & Rosales offer best-in-class payload.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Mike Newman says:

    Enjoyed this Carson. For me, it seems the 3B competition in Oakland is more a product of ROTO players wanting a sleeper in deep leagues who will log significant PT.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. Baltar says:

    You make an excellent point, Mr. Cistulli, if I understand you correctly. Although the A’s must, on Opening Day, pencil someone in at 3B, that need not mean that the player named is “the” 3B.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*