Trade Targets: Catchers

Wrapping up the series on trade targets, today we’ll look at a few catchers who might be available (and perhaps even desirable!) for teams in contention. With the Diamondbacks surprisingly in the race for the National League West (at least for the moment), Miguel Montero isn’t on the table (if he ever would have been), and he probably would have headed up this list. Leaving out the multitudes of generic backup catchers (the Jose Molinas and Matt Treanors [Treanor!] of the world), there isn’t much out there. Among the contenders, the Giants need to fill a Buster Posey-shaped hole and the Red Sox probably want to improve on the Jason VaritekJarrod Saltalamacchia Duo of Yuck. Here are four catchers might be available and/or could draw varying degrees of interest.

In no particular order…

Chris Snyder (age 30), Pirates
Projected Rest-of-Season WAR: 1.8
Contract: $5.75 million for 2011, $6.75 million club option for 2012 with $0.75 buyout (All contract information in this post is taken from Cot’s).

Snyder was made expendable in Arizona and did not impress in 142 plate appearances after coming over to the Pirates last season. However, he’s off to a good start this season (.291/.392/.430, 129 wRC+). He’s due for BABIP regression, but he’s always drawn a lot of walks and he had some good seasons in Arizona prior to 2009. He’s not a defensive wizard, but he’s not terrible, either. The contract (he’s probably owed less than $4 million for the rest of the current season) is also quite reasonable, and the club option for 2012, should Snyder continue to play well, is attractive for both the Red Sox (whose catching prospects may or may not be able to take over) and the Giants (in case Posey needs a caddy when he comes back; if not, the Giants can always pick it up and try to trade Snyder, who is affordable at that price). The Pirates, in return, could get at least a couple of C prospects, and potentially a low-end B prospect if the buying team is really motivated to make a move. Snyder is 30, so he isn’t going to be part of the next contender in Pittsburgh, so while the trade might hurt in the short-term, it’s probably the best move for the team, especially with Snyder playing well and prospect Tony Sanchez looking like he might be ready in 2012.

Ryan Doumit (30), Pirates
Projected Rest-of-Season WAR: 1 WAR
Contract: $5.1 million in 2011, $0.5 million club option after season for both 2012 ($7.25 million) and 2013 ($8.25 million) seasons

Okay, this is probably stretching the the definitions of “catcher” and “trade target” and “1.0,” but like I said, it’s slim pickings. Doumit is sort of the poor man’s Mike Napoli — not just with the bat, either. Catcher defense is hard to measure, but Doumit might be even worse than Napoli with the glove, so much so that the Pirates even tried him in right field last season. Doumit is probably worth about his salary or a bit more for the rest of the season, but he doesn’t have much value to either the Giants, who really need a guy who they can live with behind the plate on a regular basis, or the Red Sox, who might not be getting much of an upgrade over Varitek with Doumit. Doumit’s “versatility” isn’t much use, either, since the Giants already have enough first basemen and mediocre outfielders, and the Red Sox are set at first, DH, and right field. In other words, neither team really needs a Napoli. This isn’t to say that Doumit is totally unappealing or useless to these or perhaps other teams, but it would be pretty much a straight-up salary dump for the Pirates — if they throw in money they could get something like an A-ball “live arm.”

Rod Barajas (35), Dodgers
Projected Rest-of-Season WAR: 1.3
Contract: $3.25 million for 2011

Some might argue that this violates the the exclusion of Molina/Treanor types from the opening paragraph, but if Barajas does fit into that category, he’s a superior example of the type. A wOBA around .300 isn’t good, but it’s decent for a catcher in this run environment, and unlike a a lot of his truly batless peers, Barajas’ actually has a decent defensive record. He can’t get on base to save his life, but he’ll pop a few homers and block some pitches. He’s cheap, too. It isn’t clear that he’d add much to the Red Sox unless they want to give up on Salty. The Dodgers might not want to trade him to divisional rival San Francisco yet, but they’ll probably be out of the race soon, Barajas isn’t part of their future, and Dodgers GM Ned Colletti worked for Giants GM Brian Sabean prior to taking his current position. It’s not likely, but stranger things have happened. It wouldn’t cost much in talent, either, maybe a C prospect to take on a Benjie Molina-role for the rest of the year with Posey out.

Kurt Suzuki (27), Athletics
Projected Rest-of-Season WAR: 2.0
Contract: $3.4 million in 2011, $5M in 2012, $6.45 million in 2013, $8.5 million club option in 2014 with a $0.65 million buyout.

Suzuki is probably a surprise entry to many reading this, given that the As aren’t totally out of it yet, Suzuki is pretty good, and he’s signed to a club-friendly contract through his twenties. I’ll admit that I partly threw Suzuki in to “spice up” a rather unspiring group. However, keep in mind that this is Billy Beane: more than many other GMs, he understands that signing a good young player to team-friendly contract makes that player a valuable trade chip, too. His trades of Nick Swisher and Dan Haren are examples of such thinking.

Suzuki isn’t an obvious standout, but he’s good defensively, his bat is good for a catcher (particularly considering the park), he’s been pretty durable, and he’s only 27. Suzuki wouldn’t be a good fit for the Giants, given that Posey is coming back. However, he’s better than Varitek or Salty. Much would depends on how much faith the Red Sox have in prospects Ryan Lavarnway and Luis Exposito down the road. Suzuki would give them a player they can start right now and give them security at the position in the future. Although Suzuki isn’t the kind of player for whom teams normally trade top prospects, the Red Sox probably would have to give up at least one B prospect and one C prospect, and perhaps more, given Suzuki’s age, skill, and contract. They might be hesitant to do so after giving up a number of prospects in the Adrian Gonzalez trade.

I’m not saying it’s likely, just that it’s a possibility given the circumstances. The As rightly like Suzuki, but they liked Swisher and Haren, too. They may not be ready to concede now, but that could change with a few more losses. Max Stassi isn’t ready, but they could make other moves for a stopgap fill-in or try to get a catcher back as part of the trade.

What, you wanted another paragraph about Rod Barajas?



Print This Post



Matt Klaassen reads and writes obituaries in the Greater Toronto Area. If you can't get enough of him, follow him on Twitter.


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Ben
Guest
Ben
5 years 26 days ago

No David Ross? I’m sure he could be had for the right price and could start for most teams.

JT Grace
Guest
JT Grace
5 years 26 days ago

David Ross isn’t going anywhere. Just ask the Giants about the importance of having a back-up for your all-star catcher.

bblackwell
Member
5 years 25 days ago

Ross has even said that he has no desire to be a regular starter. He enjoys the 2 days a week job he has, and that’s why he so quickly signed an extension with the Braves last year.

And I don’t think Atlanta would have any interest in parting ways with him, either. It’s hard to find a great backup who relishes being a backup.

MNB
Guest
MNB
5 years 26 days ago

I thought the Nats were pretty deep at C with Ramos and Pudge plus prospect Flores. Any chance one of them gets moved?

colin
Guest
colin
5 years 26 days ago

I could see the Reds dealing Ramon Hernandez. They’d still have Hanigan and Mesoraco is ready in AAA

dustin
Guest
dustin
5 years 26 days ago

So far this series has the A’s giving up Willingham, Crisp, and Suzuki. I’m trying to imagine an A’s lineup without these three guys, and it’s pretty depressing.

brendan
Guest
brendan
5 years 26 days ago

unfortunately, the A’s lineup even _with_ these guys is depressing. I’m with you, there would not be a lot of at-bats worth watching, without coco and willingham in particular.

Rob
Guest
Rob
5 years 26 days ago

I wouldn’t be shocked to see Geovany Soto made available… but I wouldn’t expect the Cubs to let go of him for peanuts.

Ace
Guest
5 years 26 days ago

If Soto weren’t having such a crappy/injured season, I’d think the return on Soto could be a haul. But, as it is, he’s now had 1.5 crappy/injured seasons out of 3 total. Not sure I’d give up a ransom for him not knowing what I was going to get.

And from the Cubs’ perspective, it’s a shame because they should really consider looking to move him.

DNL
Guest
5 years 26 days ago

Ronny Paulino has to be included, too. He’s put up 0.7 WAR so far this year so is probably good for another 1.5. He’s on a bad Mets team and not under contract for 2012 (earns $1.35MM this year with minor escalators) and probably not in the team’s long-term plans.

Justin
Guest
Justin
5 years 26 days ago

How about Jorge Posada as backup catcher ?

Antonio Bananas
Guest
Antonio Bananas
5 years 26 days ago

13M for a guy who is old and struggling. Struggling in Yankee stadium. Struggling when he bats in THAT lineup. Who would want that? Maybe trade him to a Japan for Yu Darvish.

TheGrandslamwich
Member
TheGrandslamwich
5 years 26 days ago

Suzuki and the young pitching staff are exasctly what the A’s have been trying to build around. There is no way Suzuki gets traded. The other A’s players that have been listed are all possibilities (and possibly likelihoods), but Suzuki, no way.

Fred
Guest
Fred
5 years 26 days ago

Yup. Even though the author said it was a reach,,, I think it would take a fantastic package to get Suzuki as he is not merely a 1/2 year rental.

I doubt the A’s given him up for a B and a C propsect… this is neither a salary dump, an impending FA or a guy blocking the position for someone younger.

JT Grace
Guest
JT Grace
5 years 26 days ago

Ryan Doumit would make some sense for the Braves. He would allow the Braves to pinch hit David Ross when needed as well as serve as the emergency catcher. He also would be a bench upgrade over Brooks “Glove of Stone” Conrad.

dangnewt
Guest
dangnewt
5 years 26 days ago

The Duo of Yuck have turned it around and, based on their May splits, are now the Duo of Roughly League Average. The Pirate catchers don’t give them much more offensively and I fear for the delicate psyche of Boston’s pitching staff – baseball players are creatures of habit and starters more so than any other position. If they want to work a deal for the catching version of Adrian Gonzales, I’m all for it – but not for a minor upgrade at best.

I was worried about the BoSox catcher experiment in late April, now, I’m willing to let it ride the rest of the season.

PatsNats28
Member
PatsNats28
5 years 25 days ago

shocked at no pudge

fredsbank
Guest
fredsbank
5 years 25 days ago

where is pudge rodriguez?

NSCEGF
Guest
NSCEGF
5 years 25 days ago

I was expecting to see Pudge, David Ross, and Ryan Hanigan.

Andrew T. Fisher
Guest
5 years 25 days ago

Funny you call Rod Barajas cheap, as he’s the highest paid catcher in the division.

Bob Ponzan
Guest
Bob Ponzan
5 years 17 days ago

Sorry, but you lose all credibility when you stoop to silly name calling like the “Duo of Yuck”. This is especially true when a little analysis would show that the 2 catcher’s in question are amoung the combined leaders in offense for catching duos in the league. Oh, and their team has the best record in th American League and its pitching staff is one of the best – must be in spite of them.

When you combine that with suggestions about trading for a catcher, Suzuki, who has zero chance of being traded by the A’s, you just sound like a baseball ignoramus.

wpDiscuz