Trading Number One

Barring unforeseen tragedy or circumstance, Bryce Harper will be the number one overall pick in next week’s amateur draft. This will occur roughly a week after Steve Phillips suggested he would trade last year’s number one pick, sir Stephen Strasburg, for a proven veteran starting pitcher. Undoubtedly someone who resides somewhere will suggest a similar faith for Harper. The concept of trading the number one pick before said player reaches the major isn’t just a concept or crackpot suggestion, though, it’s happened and it’s happened as recently as last decade. Here’s a brief history.

The Tim Belcher trade

Drafted by the Minnesota Twins as the first overall pick in the 1983 amateur draft, Belcher actually did not sign with the Twins, and instead would be drafted the New York Yankees in the secondary draft. The Oakland Athletics would acquire Belcher as a free agent compensation pick less than a month later. For Belcher it was a tumultuous path not to the majors, but just to find an apartment for longer than a few weeks at a time. In 1987, the Athletics would send Belcher to complete a previous trade for Rick Honeycutt and three days later Belcher would debut in the majors. Per Baseball-Reference, he would compile 13.2 WAR for the Dodgers while starting 119 games. As for Honeycutt and the Athletics, he would spend eight years there, pitching 406 innings and recording 3.9 WAR.

The Shawn Abner trade

After 16 drafts without a first overall pick being dealt for reaching the majors, we had it happen with back-to-back picks. Drafted by the Mets in June of 1984, Abner would be traded to the San Diego Padres in December of 1986 along with Kevin Armstrong, Kevin Brown, Stan Jefferson, and Kevin Mitchell for Adam Ging, Kevin McReynolds, and Gene Walter. For his part, Abner would actually be well below replacement level despite only racking up 562 plate appearances over five years for the Friars.

The Josh Hamilton trade

This is probably the best known entry while being the one under the least normal of circumstances. Hamilton, of course, fought through addiction and league banishment just to re-enter the Rays’ minor league system in 2006. After a few weeks in short season ball he suffered a season-ending knee injury that required surgery. The Rays left him exposed for the Rule 5 draft and figured he wouldn’t stick on a 40-man roster. The Cubs took him in the draft and traded him to the Reds for cash.

The Adrian Gonzalez trade

The top pick from the 2000 draft, the Marlins would send him along with Ryan Snare and Will Smith the Texas Rangers for Ugueth Urbina. This is one of those trades where it’s easy to look at it now and say, “Wow, they gave that up for Uggie Urbina?” and yes, they did. They gave up a guy with a myriad of potential Fresh Prince and Jazzy Jeff jokes for Urbina. They also gave up Gonzalez.

At that point, Gonzalez was in the midst of a season and a half of disappointing statistics in Double-A as a 20- and 21-year-old; disappointing in the sense that he wasn’t quite the devourer of ozone layers quite yet. Presumably the Marlins didn’t feel comfortable with his development and decided that flags fly forever, so why not add the ultra good Urbina? Not that I’m defending the trade or that point of view, but Gonzalez would contribute -0.7 WAR to the Rangers over two seasons while Urbina would rack up 0.9 wins in 38 innings for the eventual world champs.




Print This Post





12 Responses to “Trading Number One”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. Eddy says:

    Good stuff pointing out that Gonzalez trade. Being a Marlins fan, people always bash us for pulling that trade but they assume Adrian was just as good back then. Not only that, but they fail to realize we won the WS, the whole point of the trade to begin with.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Jacob Jackson says:

      Another thing that people didn’t know about that Gonzalez trade back then is that Ugueth Urbina would one day pour gasoline on people, light them on fire, and try to kill them with a machete.

      +7 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • B N says:

      It was an uneven trade, but not a bad trade. The Marlins were making a run at it, they needed an arm and Urbina was actually pretty good back then. What I find interesting is that both Urbina AND A-Gonz were both involved in a second set of horrible trades a few years later.

      Half a year of 2005 Edition Urbina for 2 years of Polanco anybody?

      Or how about A-Gonz, Chris Young, AND Tremmel Sledge for Adam Eaton and Aki Otsuka?

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • mowill says:

        Well the Rangers got some karma back after that horrible trade with the Padres. Picking up Andrus, Feliz and Smoak for Mark Tex more than made up for losing out on Agonz.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Still slightly Peeved Bravos fan says:

        Smoak wasn’t included in the Teixera trade.
        Beau Jones, Matt Harrison, and Saltalamachia were the other players traded.
        Lets not blow that trade completely out of proportion.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. DonCoburleone says:

    Nice article. I had no idea the Marlins drafted A-Gon.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Circlechange11 says:

    I haven’t read much about Harper’s money, but is there any real chance that he pulls a ‘JD Drew’ or will the Nats pretty much pay whatever it takes?

    Will also be interesting to see if his contract has a “must be called up in Sept 2011″ type clause.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Kevin S. says:

      Such a clause is illegal. The best that can be done would be for Boras to negotiate a major-league contract, which would require the Nats to start using option years on him immediately. I can say with near-total certainty that a 17 y.o, will not get a major-league contract upon being drafted, but that’s the only way to sort of force a team to bring a guy up after a couple of seasons.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • BX says:

        Rick Porcello got a major league contract, FWIW.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Kevin S. says:

        Huh, that’s true.

        Still, he’s was (nearly) a year older, and catchers take longer to develop than most. I just don’t see Washington letting themselves be limited in his development. I’m sure Boras would love to have him in the majors by 19 so he could hit FA at 25, but I’m not seeing it.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. CircleChange11 says:

    I thought Boras was listing Harper as an outfielder?

    I know that the team would love for him to catch, but I didn’t get the impression that player & agent were going along with that.

    I think Harper & Boras are going to dictate to the team what Bryce is going to do … not the other way around.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>