What’s In Store for the Texas Rangers Auction

Texas Rangers

UPDATE (4pm ET): Bob Nightengale of USA Today reports that News Corp. will not be bidding for the Rangers, according to Randy Freer, president of Fox Sports Networks. Also, Dennis Gilbert has dropped out, although he had dropped off the radar some time ago, and was thought to be marrying up with Jim Crane.

Sources indicated to me early Tuesday that Mark Cuban and Jim Crane have filed bids simultaneously ahead of the 8pm CT deadline and are working together. That leaves Dallas businessman Jeff Beck as the only open question mark for tomorrow’s auction.


A bit of history will be made on Weds. when the Texas Rangers will be put up for auction, with its outcome determined at a hearing on Thurs. To place this in perspective, the last time an MLB club was auctioned out of bankruptcy was the Baltimore Orioles in 1993. Here’s some key information to know leading up to the auction:

Who’s Bidding?

The group led by Chuck Greenberg and Nolan Ryan is, of course, going to be there, but beyond that, official bidders have until 8pm CT on Tues. night to file for the Weds. auction that begins at 9am CT and will be overseen by the Honorable Russell F. Nelms. Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban has filed documents with the court in attempts to gain access to the club purchase, and Houston businessman Jim Crane has been involved with mediation sessions with William Snyder, the chief restructuring officer in the case. Dallas businessman Jeff Beck is a possibility, as well. What is unknown at the time of publication is whether Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. will be preapproved by MLB for bidding on the club, as well. If so, there could be as many as 5 groups anteing up for the purchase of the club.

Still, if no other bidders outside of the Greenberg/Ryan group show up for the auction, the proceedings will be shifted from an auction to hearing on the confirmation of the Rangers’ Third Amended Plan of Reorganization, filed July 30, 2010.

What’s the Bidding Going to Start At?

Determining the very lowest a group can bid means looking at the Greenberg/Ryan’s group offer. The approx. $520 million “stalking horse” bid is really broken down into three parts.

Rangers Baseball Express (the group led by Greenberg/Ryan) is assuming approx. $220 million in liabilities of the Rangers. Secondly, approx. $220 million is then funneled back Rangers’ Equity Owners and the creditors. After that, an approx. $80 million balance will be paid to other creditors following closing of the sale. The “stalking horse” provision of the bid process has the first bid needing to be $15 million over, so Judge Michael Lynn has said that in principle, any bidder that has at least $95 million ready in hand, can be involved in the overbid process.

That doesn’t mean $95 million is what is going to be the bid price. It means that bidders, other than Greenberg/Ryan have been given the opportunity to use “bridge funding” from creditors to cover any balance above the $95 million. Certainly, all the bidders (should more than Greenberg/Ryan be at auction on Weds) will have far more to place at bid. But, any and all funding by the bidders through bridge funding has to be paid off no later than Oct 11, more than two months from the end of the auction. Should the winner of the auction fail to reach all the funding by Oct. 11, it would likely mean that the process would be opened back up, and yet another auction could take place.

But, the focus should be on the $306.7 million cash offer Greenberg/Ryan has on the table on Weds. Once the overbid of $15 million is added as a minimum, all subsequent bids will be in $2 million increments.

What’s Up for Sale?

Given that there are still looming questions about what William Snyder, the chief restructuring officer called “insider” transactions surrounding the lease of Rangers Ballpark of Arlington, as well as the Lenders arguing that “it is impossible for…. Potential bidders – in the time allotted… — to negotiate their own separate agreements with the parties that have the right to transfer them,” Lynn is suggesting that “it is preferable that a bidder exclude tainted assets or [other parties]” that may seek to claim damages from the “eve-of-filing transaction” that involves the lease transfer and/or the $70 million separate land deal that has been brokered between Tom Hicks and the Greenberg/Ryan group. That “side deal” includes the parking around the Ballpark that is a key revenue stream for both game day events, as well as during the NFL season when the lots can be used for new Cowboy Stadium. Another side deal that has raised eyebrows is an aircraft lease.

If those aspects are removed, as Lynn has suggested, it likely means that just the Rangers will be up for sale. Sorting out the other piece, critical to the functioning of the Rangers, will be a tricky matter to undertake outside of the sales process, so it is unclear how those pieces function in the overall.

How Much is the “Breakup Fee”?

If the Greenberg/Ryan group does not win at auction, they are entitled to compensation for all the legal work done in advance that the other bidders have not had to deal with.

Judge Lynn has altered how much the group could gain back, and the amount is dependent on their decision making process.

They can elect to:

A) 125% of the group’s costs or expenses, or;

B) $10 million before the court determines which of RBE expenses and costs are allowable.

At no point will the break-up fee be allowed to exceed $13 million

Does Lynn Have to Take the Highest Bid?

This is the $64,000 question in all of this: Does Judge Lynn have to accept the highest bid, or is this a matter of seeing that there was a fair process in play? The answers to this will come out of the bidding on Weds. and from how Lynn interprets matters when the outcome of the auction is covered during hearing on the Thursday after auction.

When Will The Club Sale Be Approved By MLB?

Having MLB’s owners vote to approve ownership transfer is part of the league’s constitution. Article V, Section 2 of the Constitution (see it here) goes on to say that three-fourths of the leagues owners must approve, “The sale or transfer of a control interest in any Club”.

The league has said that if the preferred group of Greenberg/Ryan is selected through the auction process, they can have the ownership approval completed by Aug. 12, the day that funding commitments tied to the Asset Purchase Agreement reached between the Rangers and the group is set to expire. If another bidding group comes out on top, the league has said it could be as long as 9 months (although, sources close to The Biz of Baseball repeatedly said that it would likely be 3 months), before owners would vote, citing the need for each owner to conduct due-diligence on the prospective owner.

Mark Cuban, who has verbally said that he is going to actively pursue purchase of the club through the auction, is seeking to have MLB go through the approval process no later than Aug. 16, saying that must close on or before the date. The filing does not elaborate as to why Cuban is in need of MLB’s approval by vote less than two weeks after the auction will have been completed.

Could a Marriage Occur?

Whether it’s posturing or alliances being truly forged, there has been word that Cuban could be possibly aligning himself with Jim Crane. Crane had been portrayed by the creditors as having a “significantly higher bid” when they were maneuvering to get the auction to occur. As of early Tues. sources indicate  that the two are, indeed, working together making them a formidable pairing in terms of funding. It should be noted, the league has not looked favorably upon Crane since he backed out of the purchase of the Houston Astros several years ago at the 11th hour.

What Happens if the League Does Not Approve a Bidder?

If the league does not approve the winner of the auction, one could surmise that the club would become “wards of the state”, with MLB taking over the operations of the club until the smoke had cleared in the courts. The last time this occurred was with the then Montreal Expos in Nov. of 2001. The Lenders would most assuredly challenge MLB’s league constitution saying that the bankruptcy process to pay back lenders supersedes that of the league.

Will it All be Over Soon?

The short answer is, no. In some form, the Rangers sale will continue to drag on in the courts. If the creditors lose out, they have said they will appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in New Orleans. The basis of the appeal would be centered on Judge Lynn not granting enough time for competitive bidding. Should the Greenberg/Ryan group lose, it seems very possible the lawsuits will be filed there, as well.

But, those are likely to be actions on the periphery. The focus is really now on two dates: Aug. 12, should the Greenberg/Ryan group win, and Oct. 11 for any other groups in the hunt. On the latter, if the funding is reached in time, the focus will then move to MLB’s approval process.

So, while Tues., Weds. and Thurs. will set into motion how the ownership of the Texas Rangers could wind up, the sports and business pages will be sprinkled with the bankruptcy case, likely for many months to come.




Print This Post



Maury Brown is the Founder and President of the Business of Sports Network, which includes The Biz of Baseball, The Biz of Football, The Biz of Basketball and The Biz of Hockey, as well as a contributor to FanGraphs and Forbes SportsMoney. He is available for freelance and looks forward to your comments.


42 Responses to “What’s In Store for the Texas Rangers Auction”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. MikeS says:

    After reading this I am officially rooting for the Rangers to win the World Series. Imagine the uproar. Fans tend to hate ownership and blame them for not spending enough money to make their teams as good as the Yankees. So here’s a bankrupt team with no ownership at all that manages to add Cliff Lee at the deadline. If they could win it all, the hoopla that followed would be more fun to watch than any disaster film I can think of. Just get some popcorn and settle in!

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Texas_Dawg says:

    Maury Brown is a hack that has shamelessly shilled for MLB and Greenberg/Ryan throughout this process.

    And he has been dead wrong with his predictions. Brown repeatedly said in March, April, and May that Greenberg/Ryan would “very soon” be owners of the team. He was directly told by several commenters at his blog and other sites where he has posted that there were serious concerns with the lack of cash behind the Greenberg/Ryan deal (Greenberg and Ryan are only putting in a few million dollars of their own money, combined), and he flippantly dismissed these as comments.

    He’s been very quick to trumpet every bogus fear-mongering attempt by people like Nolan Ryan, such as the laughably false claims the Rangers are having scouts poached by other teams and that they wouldn’t be able to go to arbitration with Josh Hamilton.

    Brown repeatedly said that bankruptcy court would be “suicide” for the creditors. Brown at his blog on April 22: “This deal has exceptionally long odds of going into bankruptcy. Eats mightily into Monarch’s profits.” Brown at his blog on June 12, about Judge Lynn opening the process up to new bidders:

    “Much like Judge Baum in the Coyotes bankruptcy case, he was unwilling to stick his fingers in the waters around league consent. If he does, and the league does not approve Crane, there would be an incredible legal battle around consent rights… I just don’t see that.”

    He has repeatedly and erroneously referred to Monarch Capital as a “predatory hedge fund.”

    Maury Brown is a hack in love with his MLB sources and thus willing to shill for them, even though they’ve led him into being completely dead wrong throughout this whole process.

    -10 Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Snorkel says:

    I’ll go you better MikeS.

    If Rangers somehow did make the World Series, I’ll bet that the national audience for the Series would rise noticeably as a lot of people all over the country are really interested in this soap opera. If Rangers made it, I’ll bet a lot of people would root for them, just because of all the negative notoriety.

    Viewership of the Series has tracked downhill since the Red Sox broke their jinx. Add this legal drama to the Rangers “Curse of the Washing Senators” and you have a recipe for a lot of interest among even the benign baseball fans.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Maury Brown says:

    Wow… I love this post above by Texas_Dawg….

    Let’s go backwards… Actually, if you look back over Daniel Kaplan’s posts or look up “vulture” or “predatory” in terms of the type of hedge fund that purchases distressed debt, it’s a common term, and I’m certainly not the only one to use it. They look to make a profit by looking out for distressed debt when businesses fall into bankruptcy. So… sticking to it.

    On Crane… As I reported… As others have reported… as it is common history to those that follow the business of baseball, Crane backed out of the Astros deal and that’s why he was not selected above Greenberg/Ryan, and why there are consent concerns.

    On the club moving into bankruptcy…. You got me there. Don’t think that many saw this whole case getting so personal on either side of the ledger. But, one needs to consider: Both Greenberg.Ryan and the creditors would have saved millions if they had worked out a way to bridge a reported $30 million gap. Whether there was negotiating in bad faith on the Greenberg/Ryan side or the creditors side is academic at this point. It’s become a personal fight, where the creditors and Greenberg/Ryan will certainly lose a considerable chunk of change.

    On the scout poaching… If you read my reports, that commentary came from what Nolan Ryan said. Daniel Kaplan, who has reported extensively on the matter from more of a creditors position, did as well.

    On the lack of funds “being told repeatedly”… This was done on the site by one uneducated commenter that was pulling info out of thin air. So, it’s kind of like being told repeatedly that the earth is flat (no offense, Flat Earth Society members). Greenberg/Ryan is the only group out there that has money sitting in escrow waiting to close the deal. All other bidders, Cuban included, are seeking bridge funding through the likes of Monarch Alternative Capital. As my report above states, other bidders are being given till Oct 11 to close. Greenberg/Ryan could close today, based upon what they have had on the table prior. Who knows how, or if, they increase their offer, but I imagine that they will be competitive. Otherwise, they would have folded up their tent.

    As for saying “close”… Don’t ever recall that. I’ve stuck to Greenberg/Ryan for a couple of reasons. A) The biggest issue is MLB’s approval process, which currently is backing the group, and has done so pretty much from the beginning; B) If the prepackaged plan hadn’t been chocked full of holes, the strategy was sound. In other words, it is possible that Lynn could still approve the plan; C) I’ve stuck to Greenberg/Ryan for months based on the group’s makeup (Here’s my analysis from Dec. of last year). At this stage (the day before the auction), I’m sticking to it, but it’s certainly no sure bet. As I said on Lone Star Ball Radio last night, nothing would surprise me in this thing any longer.

    Finally, on me being a “shill” for Greenberg/Ryan… I didn’t get into this business by not learning what it meant to be “balanced”. Just because I pick one group over another doesn’t mean I’m a “shill” for them. Ask Tom Ricketts. As an independent freelancer, I have been able to gain access on a host of issues, and you don’t get there by playing one side of the fence.

    ‘Nuff said.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Texas_Dawg says:

      1) Just because an associate of yours uses the term doesn’t mean it isn’t a heavily biased term. Certainly not one that would be used uncritically by an actual journalist.
      2) On Crane, you are simply working off an unsubstantiated claim you have heard from others. You have no idea whether or not Crane would be approved by MLB (and Drayton McClane himself has said he would support a winning Crane bid). But because others had run with that rumor (likely advanced by Greenberg’s good friend, Jerry Reinsdorf) and your sources are completely one-sided, you continue to state it as fact as well.
      3) On Ryan’s patently bogus claims, I acknowledged where they came from. But once again, rather than question them in even the slightest way, realizing they were coming from a man obviously upset that his backdoor attempt to own an MLB club on the cheap is about to fail, you quickly trumpeted them on your blog as fact.
      4) On not seeing the case going to bankruptcy, I saw quite a few commenters at various sites (including myself) telling you back in March and April that it was very possible and not nearly the “creditor suicide” you repeatedly claimed it was.
      5) On the financing question, Crane’s initial bid had more cash and was fully arranged. That is still the case.
      6) On the timing question, you repeatedly said on your blog and in LoneStarBall.com comments that the deal would close soon
      7) You absolutely have been a shill for Greenberg/Ryan and MLB. Which of course made you popular with Rangers fans and media. It wasn’t journalism. It was advocacy. And you ended up being completely wrong on this topic… and that will be even more the case after tomorrow.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. Pat says:

    The article above is interesting, as a fan I am simply anxious to see a resolution. What concerns me is that fans were thinking a resolution would come this week, but it appears that will be followed by more litigation.

    Snorkel – I agree, I think the trials and tribulations of the Rangers in the courtroom would make for an intriguing sublot in the playoffs.

    And to Texas Dawg…wow…you have some mighty strong opinions about the author. He must have pissed you off at some point.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • t ball says:

      I don’t think Maury pissed him off, he talks down to everyone like that.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Texas_Dawg says:

      It only “appears it will be followed by more litigation” because you are taking that from Maury Brown and the Greenberg/Ryan/MLB side.

      Monarch and the parties in the background have no media presence. So MLB gets to largely control the story in the media, thanks to people like Maury Brown who have duped less interested readers and outlets (like FanGraphs) into believing they are unbiased parties just providing the honest details.

      Maury Brown has been dead wrong on the whole story because he was simply advancing MLB’s spin on every new detail on the topic… and MLB has not gotten what it wanted. So knowing that, when Maury Brown now tells you a Greenberg/Ryan loss in the auction will mean a lot more litigation… I’d say it’s a pretty safe bet that a Greenberg/Ryan loss in the auction will lead to a much quicker resolution of all this.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. jackson says:

    I think TexasDawg works for Crane.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Texas_Dawg says:

      I don’t work for anyone involved and have friends on opposing sides of the deal.

      I just find it lame when someone presents himself as an unbiased “journalist” while shilling for one side and pandering to popular opinion.

      Back in the spring, I saw Maury regularly dismissing people who were correcting him or even just asking genuine questions that didn’t fit the party line MLB and Greenberg/Ryan were feeding him. So it’s kind of fun to sit here now, reminding him how badly he has been wrong about pretty much everything related to this issue.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. Texas_Longhorn says:

    I think Texas_Dawg is a foreigner and should worry about the Braves instead of the Rangers. Go shill for Cuban and Crane somewhere else. Woof woof.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. Maury Brown says:

    That explains a lot.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  9. gatorbait says:

    And who is paying you, Texas-Dawg? Are you one of Crane’s lap dogs?
    What I don’t understand is your venom against Nolan Ryan. Rangers fans have spoken, and it’s clear that they like and will support a team run by Nolan and Jon Daniels.
    Anyone who runs off Ryan/Daniels will alienate the paying customers. Don’t you see that, you biased dumbwad?
    Maybe you’re one of those yankee lawyers and you consider it your New York duty to sabotage one of the pinstripers’ baseball competitors? Very cowardly, when you get right down to it.
    I have no problem with Maury Brown’s commentary or his reporting. The story seemed to change with the wind, anyway.
    Lastly, check your law journals. Baseball’s power to control its ownership partners has passed courtroom tests repeatedly. The Supreme Court has said time and again that only Congress can change MLB’s ownership rights.

    Yankee go home, Texas-Dawg.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Texas_Dawg says:

      Ha.

      Great demonstration of why Maury Brown’s shilling has found such a receptive and completely uncritical audience.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  10. Maury Brown says:

    Couple of points so that some erroneous commentary turns into revisionist history..,

    Kaplan and I have both reported that the action being prepared by the creditors would be to appeal, should Lynn rule in favor of Greenberg/Ryan. This is outlined in the article. Greenberg’s group is likely to file lawsuits, should the decision not go their way. These are two different methods within the courts.

    Can a link be provided where I said Greenberg/Ryan was on the cusp of being awarded the club?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Texas_Dawg says:

      From your blog post/comments on March 17:

      “If there is a silver lining for Greenberg/Ryan group, it’s this: there’s little doubting that the bloom is off the rose for any other would-be bidders of the club. With the additional debt that Hicks has tossed into the mix, the odds of the deal gaining in value is exceptionally slim.”

      March 29:

      “Overall, it’s a deal that, unless there is some unforeseen circumstance, should be resolved shortly.”

      April 22:

      “The deal’s going to stay stalled a bit longer, but not too much more.”

      Among other places…

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  11. Wonko The Sane says:

    Actually, Texas_Dawg claims to be tight with the Hicks family.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Texas_Dawg says:

      Do you realize that Hicks has done everything he could to get the team to the Greenberg/Ryan group (which is why they’ve consistently followed the advice of his lawyers), the group Maury Brown has shilled for?

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Maury Brown says:

        Um… From April 21

        Major League Baseball issued the following statement today regarding the sale of the Texas Rangers:

        “As part of the Texas Rangers sale process, Tom Hicks selected the Chuck Greenberg/Nolan Ryan group as the chosen bidder on December 15, 2009 and entered into an exclusive agreement with that group. Major League Baseball is currently in control of the sale process and will use all efforts to achieve a closing with the chosen bidder. Any deviation from or interference with the agreed upon sale process by Mr. Hicks or any other party, or any actions in violation of MLB rules or directives will be dealt with appropriately by the Commissioner.”

        Hicks was working behind GnR and MLB’s back with Crane, hence the terse press release. Hicks also worked with Crane after the APA was reached in May. “Helping Greenberg/Ryan” is partially true, but certainly not entirely

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Texas_Dawg says:

        You have no idea what you are talking about, Maury. None.

        Hicks was not “working with Crane.” HSG and its lawyers continued to talk to Crane in attempt to appease the creditors and to give the HSG/Greenberg/Ryan team a better position with the court, showing that they had fairly entertained Crane’s best offers.

        Do you think Chuck Greenberg is an idiot? Why would he be working directly with Hicks and HSG’s lawyers at this point if Hicks had been going behind his back as you allege?

        You are completely clueless on this. It’s a shame great sites like this one are still falling for your crap.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  12. Chad R says:

    In the made-for-tv movie of all of this, I think Nolan will played by Robert Duvall, Cuban will be played by Bronson Pinchot from perfect strangers, Maury will be played by Mickey Rourke (sorry Maury), JD played by Freddy Prinze Jr, and Texas_Dawg will be played by a talking douchebag.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  13. A Stephens says:

    I believe I’ve read pretty much every article written by anyone regarding the Ranger bankruptcy. While it’s probably human nature that most of us would have chosen one side or another in this drama, and while there were some who were guilty of shoddy reporting (they ultimately stood up and admitted as much), Mr. Brown, you’ve been fair and forthright in your reporting. You’ve indicated when something was opinion, and you typically tried to provide sourcing or context for what you were writing. Thank you for the professional manner in which you’ve conducted yourself.

    Texas_Dawg, while I may or may not have a rooting interest in who ends up owning the Rangers, I’m reasonable enough, and hopefully mature enough, to understand that at the end of the day it’ll be what it’ll be. I imagine Mr. brown doesn’t give it even that much thought.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  14. Greg says:

    I think Texas_Dawg makes some good points, but would like to know where all his information comes from and his qualifications for where his insight comes from. To be honest, Texas_Dawg, you don’t sound completely unbiased yourself. Are you shilling for someone? What I would really like to do, though. is commend Maury Brown for letting Texas_Dawg make his comments and not removing them, since they are highly critical of Maury on his own blog. Way to go, Maury. That says alot about you and your credibility. Thumbs up.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  15. Maury Brown says:

    I see no reason what so ever to delete his posts here or if they were on The Biz of Baseball. I find them harmless

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  16. MLBLender says:

    Texas_Dawg, you’re absolutely right, but don’t be too harsh. Maury has just repeated everything that his MLB sources have told him all along the way, and MLB has been dead wrong all throughout the process (Selig was in CONTROL of the sale process, right, RIGHT!), so you can only expect Maury’s reporting to look ridiculous in retrospect. My favorite gaff was in April when he kept telling people that the lenders would have no ability to contest the sale because the price was above the lien, and that it would be suicide for lenders to let the $30mm delta be wasted away by legal expenses in court. Here’s a wager — the final auction price will be above $300 million cash, which I bet was the creditors’ objective from the beginning.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Texas_Dawg says:

      I realize that, MLBLender.

      Maury has just been a “useful idiot” for them… and willing to do their spin for them given the nice quid pro quo arrangement this is for him. It’s just disappointing to see him now showing up at otherwise great sites like this one.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  17. MLBLender says:

    And Maury isn’t alone on this issue, since the entire media gives Nolan Ryan a complete hall pass because … he’s Nolan Ryan, but not one journalist has critically questioned Nolan Ryan’s role in this process. He is the president of the company, has a fiduciary obligation to its creditors, and all he has done is leverage his name and connections with MLB to steal (er, purchase) the team from the creditors on the cheap. None of this would have been an issue if Ryan/Greenberg had participated honestly and bid more than Crane last December. Instead, Ryan/Greenberg got MLB to kick everyone else out of the playground so that they could have the sandbox to themselves. All the fans care about is continuity of the Ryan/Daniels administration, I understand. Ryan would have served the fans better if he didn’t try to buy it himself, and actually just did his job and found a way to work with whomever the new owner is.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Texas_Dawg says:

      Exactly.

      And to be clear, Jon Daniels put this entire thing together. Nolan Ryan was just a nice PR move… and a guy who showed up well after Daniels and Thad Levine and others had their brilliant plan under way.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  18. A Stephens says:

    Suggestion Mr. Brown, may want to rename the comments area as “spin room”.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  19. Maury Brown says:

    I will tip my hay to MLBLender on one thing…. The gaffe on saying that the creditors were owed no more than the $75 million on the lien. It looked good on paper, but as the saying goes… There’s a reason the game isn’t played on paper.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  20. MLBLender says:

    Stephens, that a better name for Maury’s blog, but insert “MLB” in the front.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  21. Maury Brown says:

    You can’t make this stuff up… Greenberg should be wise not to jinx the deal… He’s overstated matters before in the press. Look at this day in history:

    Greenberg Evokes Anniversary of Ryan-Ventura Tussle on Auction Day

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  22. Maury Brown says:

    You have no idea what you are talking about, Maury. None.

    Thanks, TexasDawg. You just made a great case for my stock rising.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  23. Maury Brown says:

    UPDATE: Auction will now start at 12:30pm as the CRO determines whether Greenberg/Ryan or Crane/Cuban has the highest bid to start. Values could be the same, but how the two are structured could determine who has the highest to start things off.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  24. Jay84 says:

    Rangers100 -

    Sorry you were wrong about, well, EVERYTHING, lil’ buddy! Hope you’ll still come out and party with the rest of us. Even if it means driving aaaalllll the way out to Arlington, kid. :)

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  25. Maury Brown says:

    Auction went to Greenberg/Ryan after Cuban and Crane graciously passed last night. They could have made it more difficult, but didn’t, which should help them in the future, should they look to own a future MLB club (Pirates would be a good fit).

    At the hearing today, the club officially exited Chapter 11 when the Plan was signed off on.

    When land deal was terminated yesterday, so was Hicks removed from group. He will not be part of the Rangers org after the 12th.

    Owners meetings next week to vote on Aug. 12. New owners move in on Fri. the 13th when the Rangers play the Red Sox in Texas.

    Was amazing.. G/R won, but the creditors were a close second. Made a killing.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  26. All in all, its a good post, but you could have spent a littlemore time on it. but a good post

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *