With Fox Sports 1 Launch, Baseball Disappears Further From Network TV

On Tuesday, Fox Sports Media Group announced the creation of a new multi-sports cable network with programming beginning on August 17. The new network — named Fox Sports 1 — is a re-branding of the Fox-owned Speed Network. Speed is already in 90 million homes through myriad cable and satellite operators, so Fox Sports 1 will launch with a substantial potential audience. Industry experts are calling it the biggest challenge yet to ESPN’s sports-programming dominance.

Starting in 2014, much of Fox’s baseball programming will shift from the network TV channel to Fox Sports 1. Under the new national TV contracts MLB signed with Fox Sports, ESPN and TBS last summer, Fox will get a bigger piece of the baseball-on-TV pie. And that bigger piece will no longer be available for free.

The new Fox-MLB national TV contracts covers the 2014 through 2021  seasons. For the tidy sum of $500 million per year, Fox will broadcast the World Series, one League Championship Series, two Division Series, the All-Star Game, 52 Saturday afternoon and evening games and up to 40 additional games throughout the season. The other League Championship Series and two Division Series will be broadcast by TBS. With the launch of Fox Sports 1, many of these games will move from network TV to the new cable channel.

For their Saturday Game of the Week, Fox will air a double-header, with one game on the network and the other one on Fox Sports 1. If you don’t subscribe to cable or satellite, but you do subscribe to MLB.tv, the news here isn’t all bad: Fox agreed to lift its national TV blackouts for the Game of the Week. Starting in 2014, fans will be able to watch any Saturday out-of-market game on MLB.tv (or Extra Innings on cable). For example, if you’re a Red Sox fan living in Los Angeles, and the Fox/Fox Sports 1 Game of the Week in LA is the Dodgers versus the Mets, you’ll be able to watch the Red Sox game on MLB.tv or Extra Innings.

If you are a cable or satellite subscriber with access to Fox Sports 1, you’ll get up to 40 additional games each season. Fox is likely to pull these games from one of its Fox SportsNet affiliates and from the Yankees’ YES Network. Remember that News Corporation — Fox’s parent company — purchased a 49% stake in YES last November, with the option to increase its stake to 80% in the next five years.

The biggest changes will come in the postseason. Fox Sports 1 will broadcast both Divisions Series and the League Championship Series granted to Fox under the new national TV contract. With the other two Division Series and one League Championship Series on TBS, the only postseason baseball games on network TV will be the World Series. SBNation’s sports media reporter Steve Lepore summed it up in this tweet:

That’s a big change for the sport commonly referred to as the “national pastime.”

Baseball fans who want to watch televised games will be dishing out more money to do so. The Los Angeles Times reported that 50% of all pay-TV programming is sports-related. And that programming — whether it’s on the national or the local level — is ever more expensive. In baseball, we’ve seen new billion-dollar local TV contracts for the Rangers, Angels, Padres, Astros and Dodgers just in the past few years. The new national TV contracts with Fox, ESPN and TBS will pay MLB $13 billion from 2014 through 2021. The costs for cable and satellite operators are rising so fast that one company — DirecTV — has begun charging a sports surcharge to all subscribers. The other operators likely aren’t far behind.

So save those pennies, baseball fans. And those nickels, dimes, quarters and silver dollars. Beginning next year, you’ll need them if you want to watch national baseball broadcasts.



Print This Post



Wendy writes about sports and the business of sports. She's been published most recently by Vice Sports, Deadspin and NewYorker.com. You can find her work at wendythurm.pressfolios.com and follow her on Twitter @hangingsliders.


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
MK
Guest
MK
3 years 2 months ago

I’m going to go out on a limb and predict an increase in the number of playoff games illegally streamed per year.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

Well, that’s one step closer to me effectively giving up on baseball. I hate to be melodramatic, but seriously? Cord-cutting is becoming more and more common, but as the frequency increases, MLB allows this BS to continue.

It is becoming effectively impossible in many markets to watch an in-network baseball game without having to pay $60 a month to a cable company (Because getting baseball with a basic sub is becoming increasingly rarer).

For the love of god, MLB, drop the idiotic local market blackouts. Forget the cable middleman garbage and just take my money already. I’d be more than glad to fork out the $25 a month to watch my local team without having to let my cable company hold me over the barrel for it. The MLB.tv app is on so many media devices (I have no less than four things in my home (Xbox, two computers and a WDTV) that can play MLB.tv games, but I can’t watch my local team because the MLB continues standing idly by and letting the cable companies abuse the fanbase.

It’s getting to the point of frustration where I’m close to throwing up my hands and just becoming a football fan.

MakeitRayn
Guest
MakeitRayn
3 years 2 months ago

Soccer and basketball are better than football. Don’t do that to yourself.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

Soccer and basketball leave me in the same position, though. Still have to pay a premium for sports channels to get them around here.

cass
Guest
cass
3 years 2 months ago

Added bonus: Football is a lot less time-intensive than baseball. The non sports fans in your life will appreciate your switch. You’ll have far more time for family and other interests.

Only drawback is that football is a far lesser sport that sacrifices the longterm health of its players while glorifying violence. But it’s a proven formula – gladiatorial combat was very popular in Rome.

DodgersKingsoftheGalaxy
Guest
DodgersKingsoftheGalaxy
3 years 2 months ago

Champions League action is on the same Fox Sports channel that the Dodgers and Kings are on for me.

Wil
Guest
Wil
3 years 2 months ago

I disagree with your statement. Nothing wrong with football and it’s certainly more exciting than soccer.

MikeS
Guest
MikeS
3 years 2 months ago

Timing in this is everything. When the White Sox tried to pioneer a pay channel back before the days of cable, they lost market share. Then cable superstations like WGN grew the Cubs market nationwide a few years later. I can’t help but wonder if Fox might find themselves on the downslope of the trend here and, like you say, too many people will be giving up “traditional” cable for on-line or other forms of viewing. While some content companies are getting rich now, others are going bankrupt by trying to create new mechanisms and others are late to the party and losing their shirts on methods that have come and gone. Hard to know which this will be.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

See, that’s my think, it’s completely counter to the trends. I could get a combination of Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu+ AND MLB.tv for less than it’s going to cost me to get sports channels in my market. And that would be me deciding to go COMPLETELY overboard on services (When, really, you only need one of Netflix/Amazon/Hulu).

I’m counting the minutes until all of the cable companies finally start to implode. The price gouging they routinely and admittedly (I’ve got a couple of friends who’ve worked for Comcast before, they have an explicit policy of abusing monopoly in place in that they charge higher rates in regions where they’ve managed to keep Verizon out) subscribe to is eventually going to drive more and more people away as cord cutting becomes more prevalent.

Joe
Guest
Joe
3 years 2 months ago

The cable companies are also our monopolistic ISPs. When the TV boom pops, your internet rates are going to explode, and you’ll be no better off.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

Potentially. But then again, potentially not. With the speedy increase in wireless tech and gigabit internet from people like Google, the increased competition may prevent that. It’s becoming slightly harder to cable companies to maintain their monopoly.

chrisk
Guest
chrisk
3 years 2 months ago

The cable companies don’t care, they won’t ever implode. How was it you were planning on streaming that Hulu+/Netflix/Amazonprime/MBL.tv again? So they are well positioned to weather the storm. Its FOX1/ESPN/NBC that are going to get hit, unless they start learning how to cooperate with the trends (NBC/ABC are the co-owners of HULU so its not totally out of the realm) as oppose to fighting it.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

“Potentially. But then again, potentially not. With the speedy increase in wireless tech and gigabit internet from people like Google, the increased competition may prevent that. It’s becoming slightly harder to cable companies to maintain their monopoly.”

Stuck in a Slump
Guest
Stuck in a Slump
3 years 2 months ago

The contract covers the 2014-2012 seasons?

cass
Guest
cass
3 years 2 months ago

All hail the great cable mafia sports fan extortion scheme. Do you just like one sport or one team? Too bad. You have to pay for all the sports, even those you don’t like! Don’t like it? Then don’t watch any live sports at all ever, especially for those teams that play within a few hundred miles of where you live.

Hopefully the RSN bubble will burst soon and MLB will deal directly with their fans, rather than through the cable mafia middle man.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

Two miles. I love two freakin’ miles from Fenway. And this is somehow a disadvantage when it comes to watching the Red Sox.

UGH!

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

*live two miles

Stacey
Guest
Stacey
3 years 2 months ago

I’m sure you love two freakin’ miles from Fenway as well. Don’t sell yourself short.

DodgersKingsoftheGalaxy
Guest
DodgersKingsoftheGalaxy
3 years 2 months ago

3 miles from Chavez Ravine, i guess when it’s my turn to pay the bill i will ditch it and buy a mini-plan.

John
Guest
John
2 years 4 months ago

Whoa, if MLB starts dealing directly with the fans, goodby designated hitter.

Nick
Guest
Nick
3 years 2 months ago

Please MLB.tv lift the local blackout. I pay way too much to watch all the games and not be able to watch my local team. Quit screwing over your fans MLB, we want to watch and pay for your product now let us watch our favorite teams without having to pay extra for cable.

cass
Guest
cass
3 years 2 months ago

MLB would love to, but the individual teams would never, ever allow that, because it would destroy the value of the billion dollar deals with RSNs that are becoming the largest source of revenue in the sport. The only way for the blackout to end will be for the RSN deals to end, and there’s too much cash involved.

Paul
Guest
Paul
3 years 2 months ago

But If the local ads are aired on mlb.tv, what would be the difference?

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

The primary thing keeping cable companies afloat is sports monopolies. If they lose that exclusivity, they lose a TON of revenue from subscriptions.

cass
Guest
cass
3 years 2 months ago

The cable company wouldn’t get the subscription. That’s why they pay big money for sports. Most people need to watch it live, unlike pretty much all other content, which can be watched on DVD, Netflix, Hulu, etc. Sports also is DVR-proof and is about the only thing that most men reliably watch on TV.

Yes, MLB could cut a deal, and a few teams have – I know San Diego used to have a deal to allow local viewers past the black out anyway – but then the cable companies lose control. They don’t just want your money, they want to be the gatekeepers of television programming. That’s the only way for them to maintain their revenues in the future. If people started watching on mlb.tv and just gave the cable company a cut, pretty soon, most people would just watch on mlb.tv and then the cable coompany could be removed from the picture.

Robert Wayne
Guest
Robert Wayne
1 year 7 months ago

It’s not even a “local” blackout. I live 125 miles east of Houston and nearly 400 miles from Dallas and I’m blacked out from both Astros and Rangers games, although considering how terrible both teams played this season that might not be all bad.

Gabriel
Guest
Gabriel
3 years 2 months ago

I understand all the money involved. Great for MLB over the short and medium term. Yet, I am much less of a sports fan than I used to be. Why? I don’t have cable! Now admittedly, people like me are a fairly small percentage of households, but you have to think that essentially eliminating those people from your audience has got to hurt.

My two young sons will almost surely not be baseball fans, simply because there are essentially no games for us on TV, even though we live in a 2-team market. Not a good long-term plan for MLB.

Bob Deezel
Guest
3 years 2 months ago

It makes sense though. Postseason baseball ratings are in a freefall. Fox is probably losing money with having it on broadcast TV.

DL80
Guest
DL80
3 years 2 months ago

Good point. I think it’s some combination of too many playoff games, start times too late (especially in EST), commercial breaks too long, slow pitchers and batters, and no way to watch any of the playoff teams in the regular season (unless you live near them and can deal with blackouts).

I don’t see how this deal fixes any of those problems.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

Honestly, I think the “problem” is the relative parity. Sad as it is, the numbers are going to dip when the major markets are either having short runs or missing the playoffs entirely.

I mean, Detroit/San Francisco was certainly a compelling matchup, but it had almost no national appeal. The last World Series that really had national appeal was probably 2009.

TKDC
Guest
TKDC
3 years 2 months ago

Let me guess, you live in the Northeast?

Look at the graph:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Series_television_ratings

The slight increase in ratings here is probably due to the simple fact that more people live in and are fans of those teams (particularly the Yankees). Non-Yankees fans don’t care about watching the Yankees just like non-Giants fans don’t care about the Giants. Fans of the Padres, Rockies, or Astros are not more likely to watch the Yanks/Phils in 2009 than the Rays/Phils in 2008.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

I’m not sure how that graph runs counter to my point. It’s no coincidence that the Red Sox or Yankees were involved in four of the five highest rated WS of the last decade (Including the top three).

TKDC
Guest
TKDC
3 years 2 months ago

They’re the more popular teams in the more popular areas. My point is that there isn’t “national appeal” to the world series. Yes, those teams have more fans and those fans watch the World Series, but fans of other teams don’t watch the World Series just because the Yankees or Red Sox are playing.

TKDC
Guest
TKDC
3 years 2 months ago

*populated areas

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

When I say “national appeal” I mean strictly that, not that they’re more interesting to fans of other teams. The Red Sox and Yankees have a higher volume of displaced fans (I.E. outside of their metro market) than any other team. As such, they draw a higher national viewership than other teams.

I think this is just miscommunication here.

TKDC
Guest
TKDC
3 years 2 months ago

Yeah, that is true.

Robert Wayne
Guest
Robert Wayne
1 year 7 months ago

It’s true that the networks would probably love to see the big money teams from New York, Boston, Chicago or Los Angeles make it to the World Series every year for ratings in the most populated areas of the country, but those of us in Dixie couldn’t care less. Unfortunately my team in Houston has been a disaster for the last five or so years. I can’t wait for them to start contending again and if fans in California or the northeast don’t like it, too bad. However, I am glad to see teams like Baltimore and Kansas City, who haven’t done anything in decades battling it out for the American League pennant this year.

Jason
Guest
Jason
3 years 2 months ago

This would have been good news for the kids as the game of the week would cut short Fox’s saturday morning cartoons, but they got rid of those years ago.

Ali
Guest
Ali
3 years 2 months ago

Dying business model makes great last stab for relevance and market share.

olethros
Guest
olethros
3 years 2 months ago

Well, that’s me and watching baseball effectively over with. Goddamn it.

rbt
Guest
rbt
3 years 2 months ago

I’m confused. The article states that the new Fox MLB national TV contracts cover the 2014 through 2012 seasons. Should that be through 2022? 2032? Some other year entirely?

TKDC
Guest
TKDC
3 years 2 months ago

NBA and NHL playoffs are mostly during the Summer, when networks are showing second-rate second-rate reality shows, reruns, and miniseries featuring the brother or sister of someone who was last famous 5 years ago.

Baseball’s playoffs are during the normal TV season.

Bill
Guest
Bill
3 years 2 months ago

MLB.Com needs to start allowing users to purchase the rights to watch individual series. I’m not going to buy cable just on the off chance my team is in the playoffs. But, if my team made the playoffs, I wouldn’t think twice paying $10 for the rights to watch that series. Yes, I know illegally streaming games is a valid option, but, as long as the price is reasonable, I’d rather be legal.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

This. It’s the Game of Thrones argument.

For those unfamiliar, Game of Thrones is (Since its debut) far and away the most pirated show on television. Many people contend that the primary reason for this is that it is an absolute nightmare to watch if you don’t have HBO (Which involves paying for cable AND a premium subscription for HBO). The show is not available through any streaming service (Other than HBO Go, which requires an HBO sub) and the DVD/BR releases are running more than a year behind the show.

Many contend that the level of piracy would be substantially cut down if HBO made it available through something like Amazon for per-episode VOD.

I see the same argument holding true to baseball. I believe there are plenty of people who would pay for an a la carte MLB option.

Bill
Guest
Bill
3 years 2 months ago

I think the success of iTunes proves that most people would prefer to be legal. I laughed when iTunes was first launched because I didn’t think anyone would pay a dollar a song when they could so easily pull that song for free off of first Napster (Kazaa, Limewire, etc.) then Torrent sites. The same, I think, holds true for MLB. People would be willing to pay a reasonable price to watch what they want. Many people, however, are not willing to pay a lot of money for a lot of stuff they don’t want in order to watch something they do want. People feel like they are being exploited in this case and so won’t feel bad about watching an illegal feed. If I wanted a pack of gum, but the store said I could only buy that pack of gum if I also bought a gallon of Mayonnaise, a bucket of hog jowls, and a pound of wheat germ; if I knew I couldn’t be caught, I think I might just slip that pack of gum in my pocket. Screw them. I don’t need wheat germ.

Evan
Guest
Evan
3 years 2 months ago

The Saturday games pulled from a Fox SportsNet affiliate or YES sounds like what MLBNetwork has been doing most Saturday nights in terms of retransmitting a local feed. Unless MLBNetwork is adding additional national broadcasts this isn’t really adding to the availability of games through cable/satellite so much as adding another station that fans and non-fans alike have to pay for if they choose to subscribe to cable/satellite television.

Charlie
Guest
Charlie
3 years 2 months ago

I have a solution: go to your favorite watering hole that pays for the games (to attract customers) and watch the game over some beers with friends.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

That’s what I’ve essentially ended up doing, honestly. Useless for weekend games (Way too busy), but for the odd game here or there, it works.

philosofool
Member
Member
philosofool
3 years 2 months ago

This was my solution. Then I had a son. It’s just not as easy to take off in the middle of afternoon or evening to watch a game anymore.

Bill
Guest
Bill
3 years 2 months ago

For the price of the beer over a season, I could buy the requisite cable packages many times over.

AverageMeansAverageOverTime
Guest
AverageMeansAverageOverTime
3 years 2 months ago

Personally, this has no negative impact on me at all. I don’t watch network TV, or subscribe to mlb.tv. I watch 150-160 games a year of my local team. If I’m interested in watching other games I have cable so those are available, too.

yung joc
Guest
yung joc
3 years 2 months ago

just going to point out that I graduated from college last year and NONE of my friends have chosen to pay for cable, even the ones with great-paying jobs… so yeah, i’m going to say they’re on the downslope. also, i absolutely hate this, so maybe that’s clouding my judgment.

Greg
Guest
Greg
3 years 2 months ago

Baseball is returning to its radio roots. <3 Gameday Audio.

Jonathan
Guest
Jonathan
3 years 2 months ago

Meh. Gameday audio’s relatively cheap, but you can get the local stations free via TuneIn Radio.

Plus, if the quality’s as terrible as it was last year (Constant skipping, syncing issues, constant buffering in full service on the phone), I’m not interested.

allan
Guest
allan
3 years 2 months ago

MLB also believes that Canada is part of the United States. Last fall, Canadians had no option to purchase the MLBTV international (i.e., non-US) feed. Many Canadians have no access to Fox even if they wanted it, so that effectively left them SOL. If there is a decision that has anything remotely to do with the good of baseball and its fans, you can bet your house and this year’s salary that Selig et al. will choose the worst option every time.

Chucky
Guest
Chucky
2 years 10 months ago

Wrong on 2 counts:

(1) Sportsnet in Canada airs the international feed for the World Series at least.

(2) As Canada has over 80% cable/satellite penetration, most Canadians get a Fox station among their US channels. The Fox Saturday games aren’t affected by “simsub” rules up North.

KCDaveInLA
Guest
KCDaveInLA
3 years 2 months ago

I can’t be too mad at MLB for signing this deal; major sports follow money, sharks attack when they smell blood, it’s all nature. I just hope it doesn’t become an all-or-nothing scenario where we would get no games via network TV (read: over-the-air digital access for cheapskates like me who can’t stand paying $80 a month for a product that is comprised of 2% games I care about, 3% games I don’t care about, about 5% movies and shows I might actually enjoy, and about 90% inane reality TV).

Brett
Guest
Brett
3 years 2 months ago

Eh. This is annoying but not a huge deal. I have cable now because it comes with the internet I get here at college but I graduate in May and am moving outside of the Giants blackout area. I won’t get cable when I move but MLB.tv will cover me for most Giants games and I can find a way to watch 7-12 games a year (LDS and LCS) if I need to. Also because my parents will always have cable I will have access to ESPN and other things through them. Really I just don’t see this as a big blow.

DodgersKingsoftheGalaxy
Guest
DodgersKingsoftheGalaxy
3 years 2 months ago

It’s always the parents, old people don’t change their ways even if it’s for their own good.

DodgersKingsoftheGalaxy
Guest
DodgersKingsoftheGalaxy
3 years 2 months ago

Collect those pennies, my baseball piggy bank had $65 in it the last time.

Joe
Guest
Joe
3 years 2 months ago

Despite “Jonathan” dominating the comments section here, network TV is less and less relevant. The majority of people still have convenient ways to watch the games.

philosofool
Member
Member
philosofool
3 years 2 months ago

I think that the big problem here is that MLB has created a conflict of interests between individual clubs.

Teams keep the money from their TV deals. MLB.TV is revenue shared profit. That means that individual franchises are competing with MLB for profits from internet streaming and need the blackouts to keep their TV contracts valuable.

The solution is to make a significant portion of internet revenue not profit shared so that teams’ revenues aren’t threatened by internet distribution in their local markets. Then individual teams can decide whether to sell their product over the internet. Yes, Dodgers fans are going to be pissed, because the Dodgers are probably contractually obligated not to sell their baseball over the internet.

Highball Wilson
Member
Highball Wilson
3 years 2 months ago

I will watch baseball and pay to do so. I am a hopeless fan.

NWconservative
Guest
NWconservative
3 years 2 months ago

As someone who has suffered through Mariners games in recent seasons (now I live in Chicago, so get to suffer through Cubs games) I am thrilled with the new options. BUT, just like the Final 4 and NIT, games are all over the damned channels so surfing takes up half of your time. All-in-all, mlb.com will be a better investment for me if I want to watch something other than the Cubs or White Sox on local stations. After all, I want to watch the Yankees run the bases this year on all of their crutches!

me
Guest
me
2 years 7 months ago

I will not pay the cable/satellite ransom. I cut the cord on cable and only now have Netflix and OTA. They will not force me to pay. I just will not watch anything that is not available live over the net for a one-time charge or is available of OTA. I was going to watch and pay the $25 and watch on my PS3 until I read USA and Canada cannot watch live. Really, seriously? Too bad, they lose. I WILL NOT BE HELD RANSOM BY some corporate bean counter.

Jeff
Guest
Jeff
2 years 5 months ago

To me this is great news, getting rid of the blackouts during the FOX games will help, plus I have subscribed to MLB Extra Innings every year since 2008 and I usually watch games outside my area as well as games in my area. As for people complaining about Fox Sports 1 you will get more regular season games than ever before.

J.T.
Guest
J.T.
2 years 3 months ago

Radio is still free.

Gary Rogers
Guest
Gary Rogers
1 year 1 month ago

But only until they get it attached to the networks somehow! It’s coming, the day when you will have to buy time just to listen to the radio!

Example: The internet was created as a Defense mechanism by DARPA using U.S. Tax Dollars. How is it that an infrastructure CREATED by the People (using our money) is then sold to the highest bidders INCLUDING our enemies, and THEN WE HAVE TO PAY FOR IT AGAIN! It is absolutely CRIMINAL! WE SOLD (GIVEN) IT TO OUR ENEMIES, AND OUR NATIONAL SECURITY IS VULNERABLE TO ATTACK BECAUSE WE OPENED THIS SECRET TO THE WORLD!

How many households have been victimized by international THUGS who rip off old people and steal the identities of a LOT OF AMERICANS!

Sure, it has done a LOT of good in the world too, but WHO IS FOOTING THE BILL? YOU AND ME! WE CREATED IT AND NOW WE ARE PAYING FOR IT.

SOMEDAY we’ll be paying for radio too! I mean, how many people had to buy analog to digital converters when the guv’munt dictated the switchover? Soon, radio will be forced to go digital and they will bilk us again!

After all, Big Brutha is watching and controlling everything anyway!

Robert Wayne
Guest
Robert Wayne
1 year 7 months ago

Here I was ready to watch the baseball playoffs and half the games are on this stupid Fox 1 channel, whatever that is. It’s bad enough that my regional team, the Houston Astros have not only been atrocious the last five years, but they signed some kind of contract with a cable network that’s on the brink of bankruptcy and I can’t even catch their games. Now, the playoffs have been ruined because half the games are on a channel I can’t get either. Baseball is committing slow suicide with these blunders.

Gary Rogers
Guest
Gary Rogers
1 year 1 month ago

You know, if we boycotted all MLB websites and BALLGAMES and got rid of our sports cable/satellite additions then they would be forced to listen to reason. The REASON THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH THIS is we are ADDICTED AND THEY KNOW IT. TAKE AWAY THE ADDICTION AND THE DEALERS DROP OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH!

AND if NOBODY SHOWED UP FOR MLB GAMES they would be forced to lower the ticket prices! We feed their ability to charge exorbitant prices!

Signed
FORMER ADDICT!

wpDiscuz