Wither Wandy?

Very quietly, Houston Astros lefty Wandy Rodriguez ranked among the better starters in the National League over the past few seasons. The man once known as Eny Cabreja made a name for himself from 2007 to 2009, striking out 8.25 batters per nine innings, walking 2.89 per nine, and posting a 3.81 xFIP that ranked in the top 20 among NL starters.

It hasn’t been a banner year for Rodriguez, though. Through his first 13 starts, the 31-year-old has been lit up for a 5.60 ERA. That’s the highest mark among qualified NL starters. Has Wandy lost his magic?

While Rodriguez isn’t pitching at the same level as he did over the ’07 to ’09 period, his ERA does overstate the extent of his struggles — his FIP is 4.41 and his xFIP is 4.49. Rodriguez has been plagued by a .353 BABIP, second-highest among qualified Senior Circuit starters and well above his .314 career figure. Further, his rate of stranding runners on base has dipped to 62.5 percent; the MLB average is in the 70-72 percent range, and Rodriguez’s career left on base rate is 69.4 percent.

So, Wandy hasn’t really been among the worst starters in the league. But he’s still falling well short of his pre-season forecasts. ZiPS projected 8.13 K/9, 2.81 BB/9 and a 3.78 FIP, while CHONE envisioned 8.16 K/9, 2.95 BB/9 and a 3.80 FIP. So far, Rodriguez has punched out 6.22 hitters per nine frames and issued 3.73 BB/9.

Unsurprisingly, with those strikeout and walk totals, Rodriguez is missing fewer bats, putting fewer pitches in the zone, and is getting behind in the count more than usual. From 2007 to 2009, he garnered swinging strikes 8.7 percent of the time, slightly above the 8.6 percent MLB average over that period. He located 52.3 percent of his pitches within the strike zone, with the MLB average ranging from 49.3 to 51.1 percent. Rodriguez threw a first pitch strike 60 percent, besting the 58 percent big league average.

In 2010, however, his swinging strike rate is 7.6 percent (8.2 MLB average), his zone percentage is 45.5 (47.3 MLB average) and his rate of first pitch strikes is 58.2 (58.3 MLB average).

According to Pitch F/X data from TexasLeaguers.com, Rodriguez is throwing more two-seam fastballs at the expense of four-seamers this season. Maybe it’s a classification quirk, but that would help explain his career-high 47.5 ground ball rate. Rodriguez is throwing the two-seamer for strikes (65 percent, compared to the 61.9 percent MLB average), but the pitch gets few whiffs — 4.3 percent, as opposed to the 8.4 percent MLB average.

When Wandy does throw a four-seamer, the pitch is rarely on the mark. The four-seamer has been thrown for strikes just 52.7 percent (64.1 MLB average), with a 3.2 percent whiff rate (6 percent MLB average). Batters are swinging at the pitch only 29.3 percent of the time (44.6 big league average). By contrast, Rodriguez threw the pitch for a strike about 66 percent of the time in 2008 and 2009, with an average whiff rate and a swing percentage in the low-forties.

His signature mid-70’s curveball hasn’t been as sharp, either. Rodriguez has induced a strike with the curve 60.3 percent in 2010, which is still above the 58 percent MLB average, but falls short of his 63.2 percent mark in 2009 and 62.4 percent figure in 2008. The whiff rate on his curve is 12.4 percent, down from 14 percent in 2009 and 14.2 percent in 2008 (10.5 percent MLB average).

After losing his arbitration hearing over the winter, Rodriguez is earning $5 million this season. He’s arbitration-eligible again next year, so he’s under team control through 2011. Given his track record of quality pitching over the past few seasons, Houston’s place in the standings and the team’s moribund (at least until recently) player development system, Rodriguez could find himself on the trading block. Whether the Astros choose to keep him or swap him, the club could surely use the ’07 to ’09 version of Wandy Rodriguez, as opposed to the merely adequate pitcher on display so far this season.




Print This Post



A recent graduate of Duquesne University, David Golebiewski is a contributing writer for Fangraphs, The Pittsburgh Sports Report and Baseball Analytics. His work for Inside Edge Scouting Services has appeared on ESPN.com and Yahoo.com, and he was a fantasy baseball columnist for Rotoworld from 2009-2010. He recently contributed an article on Mike Stanton's slugging to The Hardball Times Annual 2012. Contact David at david.golebiewski@gmail.com and check out his work at Journalist For Hire.


14 Responses to “Wither Wandy?”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. god shammgod says:

    Nice piece, only three weeks too late. But a good take, nonetheless.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Matt Walsh says:

    I’ve always been confused by the strand rate statistic. I understand that regardless of pitcher skill, we should expect a BABIP of near .300. However, doesn’t it also stand to reason that better pitchers will have higher strand rates? Good pitchers will allow fewer base runners, but because they also get outs at a higher rate than lesser pitchers, shouldn’t they strand a higher percentage of the base runners they allow? Thus, predicting a regression to the league average for good and bad pitchers may be foolish.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Torjazz says:

    Assuming that you are asking the question of where the Wandy went that we might have expected, you probably wanted to start your headling with “Whither”. My apologies if you were asking Wandy whether he is shriveling up and drying out.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Dave K says:

    Any conclusions/predictions? I’ve been debating whether or not to buy low on Wandy for about a month, but I haven’t found any promising statistics that point to a turnaround to the 08/09 version. definitely an interesting analysis though.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. YG says:

    Nice article. after looking the Pitch FX over I had to say “wow”. The change in his pitching arsenal is drastic in terms of amount of certain pitches thrown is amazing. I just don’t understand why he would change what’s working though especially considering that his velocity has been pretty constant with his history. I hope he’s not downplaying an injury or something. If we’re going off #s though, it doesn’t seem like the real Wandy will show up until he can locate the 4 seam fastball and throw it much more often.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. Arthur says:

    I bought into the Wandwagon about the same time this article was published and got rewarded pretty mightily. In that time frame – 3 wins, 28 ip, 25k’s, 4 earned runs.

    I might get killed for this on fangraphs-but i subscribe to Matthew Barry’s theory of fantasy baseball, where each player will put up roughly the same stats for the year as his career numbers would indicate. Even if the numbers for Wandy at the end of the year show a decline by 10-15%(his career numbers progressed each time in the past 3 years, btw), that would mean that he will have a superb second half of the season.

    I traded for Aramis Ramirez two weeks ago too.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. nERF BArs says:

    Hey! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog. Is it very difficult to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I’m thinking about creating my own but I’m not sure where to begin. Do you have any points or suggestions? Many thanks

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. pusat plakat says:

    Hello, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one and i was just curious if you get a lot of spam responses? If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can suggest? I get so much lately it’s driving me crazy so any support is very much appreciated.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  9. Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your content seem to be running off the screen in Safari. I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with web browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know. The design look great though! Hope you get the problem fixed soon. Many thanks

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  10. Fantastic post but I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this topic? I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Cheers!

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  11. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was curious what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet smart so I’m not 100% positive. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  12. This web web-site is genuinely a walk-through for all the information you wanted about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and you’ll certainly discover it.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  13. Insurance says:

    Hey! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog before but after checking through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back often!

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>