2012 Keeper Rankings for Catchers: 1st Tier

Throughout the season, we ran a series of fantasy rankings for each position at the top of each month to help you keep track of the risers and fallers and to see who might be worth a sell high or buy-low effort.  Well, this week, we are rolling out a series of Keeper Rankings for each position to help you get a leg up on the competition and begin your preparation for the 2012 season.  Each author will take his assigned position and each post will be dedicated to a specific tier within that position.  With that, here is the top tier for catchers in keeper leagues.

One caveat before we begin — as always, evaluating keepers is based on past performance, expected performance and cost.  You could have a catcher who pops you 25 HR, but if he costs too high a percentage of your draft budget, then you may want to consider letting him go back into the player pool and find yourself a cheaper alternative.  Conversely, you could have a player who may not have had the strongest 2011 campaign, but you expect him to break out next season and you’ve got him for a song.  If the cost is super low, then you may want to take the chance and hold him for another year , waiting for the break out.  The decisions aren’t always easy to make and many times it comes down to the individual owner’s current roster status, needs and preferences.  We do the best that we can here in helping you make the right decisions and while some will disagree with specific players and their rankings, we have nothing but your best intentions in mind.

That being said, here is the top tier…

Mike Napoli, TEX — As expected, Napoli’s star shined even brighter once he escaped the clutches of the evil Mike Scioscia.  Trues, his playing time in Texas may have been a bit more limited had it not been for the injury to Adrian Beltre, but once he got it, he did not disappoint.  His .320-30-75 batting line with 72 runs scored marked career highs across the board, and he did it in just 432 plate appearances.  He increased his walk rate, dropped his K%, and became an integral part of Texas’ run to the World Series this year.  He has commanded the playing time and will subsequently receive it next year.  Even better for his owners was that his cost is probably fairly low.  While Zach Sanders’ 2011 FVARz retro auction value sheet shows Napoli’s return of $19.78, there’s no way he cost that much.  Not when he was going somewhere between the 11th and 13th round in most drafts.  He should make for a rock solid, cost-efficient protect for next year.

Carlos Santana, CLE — The only knock you can throw down on Santana right now is the batting average.  A .239 mark just isn’t going to cut it unless your popping 40 HR in a season.  However, there is tremendous belief in the youngster and knocking 27 HR with 79 RBI in your first full season ain’t nothing to sneeze at.  Add in that his still fantastic 14.7 BB% and respectable (for a rookie) 20.2 K% are both a few ticks below the numbers he is really capable of producing, and you’ve got yourself one heck of a long term backstop in fantasy.  You can easily imagine what that OBP would look like with improvements in both stats.  Yahoo and ESPN tried to kill his value with 2011 pre-draft rankings that were too high, but for the most part, Santana was taken between the 8th and 10th rounds in most drafts.  Perhaps next year the luck dragons won’t be too hard on him and we’ll see an even better return than this year’s $13.00.

You might be surprised to see me stop here for the first tier with so many other names out there, but based on the criteria of performance and cost, these sit as the absolute no-brainers right now.  The second tier, which you will see on Wednesday, doesn’t have much of a significant drop-ff in production, however, each player has a sticking point or two that may require further evaluation before you automatically hold them over.

Until then…




Print This Post

Howard Bender has been covering fantasy sports for over 10 years on a variety of websites. In addition to his work here, you can also find him at his site, RotobuzzGuy.com, Fantasy Alarm, RotoWire and Mock Draft Central. Follow him on Twitter at @rotobuzzguy or for more direct questions or comments, email him at rotobuzzguy@gmail.com


20 Responses to “2012 Keeper Rankings for Catchers: 1st Tier”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. Buster Posey says:

    I’m going to make you look ridiculous.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Brian McCann says:

    What about me?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Howard Bender says:

      Age, injury, and what it probably cost to own you in 2011 all in play here, Big Bri. We’ll get to you on Wednesday…

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • batpig says:

        Not every league uses the same cost structure, I think it’s better to rank players by performance tier and then owners can weight that against their particular cost structure.

        Not having Brian McCann in the top tier of a fantasy catching article is sort of criminal…

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Miguel Montero says:

    Haters gonna hate…

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • batpig says:

      or, more accurately, fanboys can’t see clearly.

      one season of pretty good performance does not make you top tier. A .282 AVG, .351 OBP, 18 bombs and 86 RBI is pretty decent for a catcher, but it’s nowhere close to “elite”.

      It’s pretty hard to construct an objective argument that Montero belongs in the top tier of any catching ranking when he has so many health concerns, and isn’t elite when healthy (like 2009 and 2011). Solid catcher, probably underrated, but not even close to “top tier” unless there is a major cost factor component.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Brad Johnson says:

    I’m the happy owner of Napoli and Santana in my two catcher league. They cost $20 and $15 to keep respectively. I’m hoping they can combine for 1200 PA at a position where getting 900 PA between two guys is doing well for yourself.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. adohaj says:

    I see glaring omissions…oh wait you factored in cost ok

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. Ray says:

    Cost in every auction league will be different. How are you determining the cost?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Ray says:

      one more point. The cost of a player will be different based on the catchers available on auction day. Are you assuming Santana was not retained in an auction keeper league or re-draft keeper league?

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • byron says:

        A better format for the article would be to discuss what percentage of auction budget prominent catchers might be worth. For me, I’m torn on Lucroy at $3 in 4×4 Ottoneu and almost certainly going to keep Iannetta at $12. I’d be interested in opinions on those decisions, not shots in the dark at maybe Napoli and Santana being good keepers. Santana is at $54 in our league due to a mis-bid, and Napoli at $21. The numbers in this article bear no resemblance to those in my league, as they won’t for many.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. Franklin Stubbs says:

    Now go see Joe Mauer win another MVP.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. beardawg says:

    I’ve got Napoli $2, ha!

    hey why isn’t Billy Butler on the 2011 FVARz spreadsheet, yo?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  9. buck turgidson says:

    Will the Jesus maintain his C eligibility to begin 2012?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  10. Max says:

    So if the first such post covers all of 2 players, are there going to be like 90 keeper-position-tier articles?

    (jk, I love this idea. keep it up. I just think it could get confusing if the articles aren’t consolidated by position.)

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  11. Matt H says:

    I agree that these rankings should be done by performance, not cost. Neither of my keeper leagues have auctions or costs, so this isn’t very helpful for me.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>