Could Grass Be Greener for Ricky Nolasco?

In 2009, Ricky Nolasco was the poster boy for performing well below your predictors. His ERA ended at 5.06 while his FIP suggested 3.35. This disparity was in large part due to his high strikeouts and modest walk rate which collided with an abnormally low strand rate and piles of hits allowed. He was a classic buy low kind of guy in fantasy circles, with most expecting a major improvement in 2010.

Nolasco did improve, but not by a whole lot. And what’s happened since then is he has continued to underperform his FIP, and yet he has very much declined in performance. This can be summed up pretty quickly:


Nolasco went from a 9.49 K/9 and a 24.8% K rate to a 5.89 K/9 and 15% K rate in four years. That’s a huge drop off. Going with it, ever so slightly, is his velocity which has gone from 91.5 down to about 90.

What’s interesting is Nolasco has maintained his ERA right around 4.50 over the last three seasons, and his FIP hasn’t fluctuated that much either, regularly settling in under 4.0. And yet, you can barely recognize the pitcher from four seasons ago.

Nolasco has tinkered with his repertoire, leaning less on his four seam fastball while increasing usage of his two seamer:

The increased usage of the two seamer might be to blame for the precipitous drop in strikeout rates as he generates a measly 2.8% whiff rate on the pitch. The other result is he’s become much more of a ground ball pitcher, seeing his rate go from 38% to almost 47%.

Now, being a no-strikeout, ground ball kind of pitcher isn’t a terrible thing, but the Marlins weren’t particularly good on defense last year, and all of their options at third base were pretty disastrous. Based on his hit trajectory, his expected BABIP was .337 and his actual BABIP was only .309. Add to that what will likely be a questionable group of infielders in Miami in 2013, and you have a pretty unattractive recipe.

Beyond the declining strikeouts and modified repertoire, the strangest thing I unearthed looking at Nolasco is his release point on his pitches. I strung them together in a gif for comparison, so wait a few seconds on each (and thanks to Texasleaguers.com for the data and images).

Release points are typically tightly clustered, or if it’s not as a whole, at least each pitch type is. This is Nolasco’s 2011 release points for all pitches versus 2012:

First off, I love the unknown pitches that have release points somewhere over around third base. But 2012 is just a hot mess for release points. They’re all over the place, regardless of the pitch type. So out of curiosity, I just pared it down to a four seam fastball for clarity and then split it into halves over 2012:

Just what the hell is going on here? In the first half of 2012, he had a release point that resembled the one he had in 2011, but over the second half he moved his arm slot in dramatically. There was an uptick in velocity, but only about a half mile per hour, which is something you can typically expect over the course of the season for pitchers anyway (if not less than you would expect, actually). If you’re the optimistic type, it’s just an oddity. If you’re the suspicious type, this is either a desperate pitcher trying something new and/or a pitcher who is experiencing some discomfort in the old arm slot. You choose.

Of course, Nolasco has been in the news because of the fish selling off any of their contracts which people are willing to absorb, with Ricky being about the last one left in town. But you have to bet clubs are cognizant of his limitations and his trends. If he is dealt, he should hope it’s to a team with a terrific infield defense, a pitching coach with lots of savvy and patience, and a trainer with a table at the ready.




Print This Post

Michael was born in Massachusetts and grew up in the Seattle area but had nothing to do with the Heathcliff Slocumb trade although Boston fans are welcome to thank him. You can find him on twitter at @michaelcbarr.

9 Responses to “Could Grass Be Greener for Ricky Nolasco?”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. Kyle says:

    How is being a low-strikeout, groundball pitcher not a terrible thing? There’s a clear relationship between high-babip and high groundball rates, which leads to lower strand rates, which obviously leads to more runs. All of which FIP doesn’t even look at, which is why FIP thinks he’s better than he is.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Michael Barr says:

      it’s not a terrible thing inasmuch as other pitchers have gotten away with it in the past, but it’s just not easy: Tim Hudson, Clayton Richard, Derek Lowe (the good Derek Lowe), etc. It’s certainly not a good thing, which is probably what I should have added.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Travis L says:

      I think it was meant in the sense, like, “at least he’s not a low K flyball guy”. Those guys are awful.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Chicago Mark says:

    HUH!!! I thought groundball pitchers were preferred. Fly balls turn into home runs and home run suppression is the idea. Outside of the strikeout that is. Isn’t it?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Kyle says:

      Well home runs are clearly bad, but not every hitter is a home run threat and, for the most part, only well-hit fly balls are home runs. For instance, if Denard Span is at bat, as a pitcher I want him to hit the ball in the air. It probably won’t be a home run and it eliminates his speed. Also, a ground ball has a greater chance of being a hit than a fly ball, which is why strand rates are lower and BABIP is higher when a pitcher specializes in ground balls. Being a ground ball pitcher isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but pitchers don’t approach every at bat by trying to coax a ground ball (with some exceptions like Hudson or good Derek Lowe, who really just have a great sinker).

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. nvcxbviu says:

    Hello, everybody, the good shoping place, the new season approaching, click in.
    ===== w/ww.gocntrade.c/om =====
    Discount UGG Boots,
    Air Jordan (1-24) shoes $35,
    Air max shoes (TN LTD BW 90 180) $36,
    Nike/shox (R4, NZ, OZ, TL1, TL2, TL3) $35,
    Handbags ( Coach Lv fendi DG) $36,
    T-shirts (polo, ed hardy, lacoste) $20,
    Jean (True Religion, ed hardy, coogi)$35,
    Sunglasses ( Oakey, coach, Armaini)$16,
    New era cap $12,
    (NFL MLB NBA NHL) jerseys $25,
    free shipping,
    Accept credit card and (PAYPAL),
    ===== w/ww.gocntrade.c/om =====

    -10 Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. soupman says:

    couldn’t it just be accouted for based on where nolasco toes the rubber to set up? or does pitchfx correct for that?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. marlins12 says:

    “Questionable group of infielders in Miami in 2013…”

    Possibly but as it stands right now, they project to be better defensively than in recent years. Especially the left side of the infield. As you said, the Marlins have sucked defensively at 3B for years and SS, with Hanley many of those years, sucked too.

    Escobar, if he stays, at 3B is an upgrade for sure and Hechevarria is basically in the big leagues only because of his glove. It’s surely not because of his bat.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current day month ye@r *