<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ADP Values at Catcher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/</link>
	<description>Daily fantasy baseball analysis and strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:22:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve shane</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/#comment-12735</link>
		<dc:creator>steve shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6810#comment-12735</guid>
		<description>amicrazy...you must be crazy!!!

where are you getting those numbers for wieters from????

in 09, he had 354 AB at the MLB level with 9 HR 35 R 43 RBI

he had 246 post AS break ABs with 6 HR 25 R 33 RBI

you lose all credibility when you start posting fictitious numbers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amicrazy&#8230;you must be crazy!!!</p>
<p>where are you getting those numbers for wieters from????</p>
<p>in 09, he had 354 AB at the MLB level with 9 HR 35 R 43 RBI</p>
<p>he had 246 post AS break ABs with 6 HR 25 R 33 RBI</p>
<p>you lose all credibility when you start posting fictitious numbers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/#comment-9426</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6810#comment-9426</guid>
		<description>I heard you got the fever for the flavor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard you got the fever for the flavor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayCee</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/#comment-9398</link>
		<dc:creator>JayCee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6810#comment-9398</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to play in any league where VMart goes 4th round or below. Catcher-eligible cleanup hitter of the Red Sox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to play in any league where VMart goes 4th round or below. Catcher-eligible cleanup hitter of the Red Sox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmIcrazy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/#comment-9345</link>
		<dc:creator>AmIcrazy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6810#comment-9345</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t like mccann that early because, well it&#039;s early, and he&#039;s a full time catcher. lack of dh and the obvious risk with his position makes a 4th round pick seem like a high price. i&#039;d rather have granderson or ethier. that&#039;s a good spot for a 2B also. were pedroia or cano still around?

i probably wouldn&#039;t consider mccann until the 8th, but like mr. sarris suggests early C value can be in the eye of the drafter!

also why i struggle with victor martinez. he can get ab at DH or 1B...and if he gets banged up, there&#039;s a good chance his bat gets into the lineup somehow. i could see well over 100 rbi for him, but still get nervous thinking about where to take him. my league chronically underdrafts C, so there&#039;s a chance he could be around in the 4th or 5th. would 4th round for victor be a no-brainer??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t like mccann that early because, well it&#8217;s early, and he&#8217;s a full time catcher. lack of dh and the obvious risk with his position makes a 4th round pick seem like a high price. i&#8217;d rather have granderson or ethier. that&#8217;s a good spot for a 2B also. were pedroia or cano still around?</p>
<p>i probably wouldn&#8217;t consider mccann until the 8th, but like mr. sarris suggests early C value can be in the eye of the drafter!</p>
<p>also why i struggle with victor martinez. he can get ab at DH or 1B&#8230;and if he gets banged up, there&#8217;s a good chance his bat gets into the lineup somehow. i could see well over 100 rbi for him, but still get nervous thinking about where to take him. my league chronically underdrafts C, so there&#8217;s a chance he could be around in the 4th or 5th. would 4th round for victor be a no-brainer??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AmIcrazy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/#comment-9331</link>
		<dc:creator>AmIcrazy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6810#comment-9331</guid>
		<description>you keep saying you don&#039;t want a catcher early, but is there a way to analyze if it makes sense? i hear you on the 85% of at bats, but it works the other way too.

isn&#039;t it easier to find a decent hitting OF late? i&#039;d expect that OF to hit for a higher average than your typical late catcher. 

which early pick/late pick combo would you prefer:
.300 catcher/.270 outfielder
.270 catcher/.290 outfielder 

considering scarcity of talent in a mid and late combo it might look more like:
.300 C / .275 OF
.265 C / .290 OF 

both of them favor the early catcher. the second one by a lot. just making the point that 85% fewer at bats doesn&#039;t bother me if the C is truly a better hitter than the OF available.   

runs and rbi, huge difference if your C is a team&#039;s #3 hitter. didn&#039;t build any data to compare other stats tho.

i&#039;m really not trying to be difficult. only once can i remember drafting a C in the top 10 rounds myself (mccann in the 10th two years ago, similar case almost). 

i just wonder at what point should we not turn one down...for example, i&#039;d take joe mauer in the 7th inning. maybe earlier. now, for me, the question becomes &#039;how much like joe mauer can wieters be?&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you keep saying you don&#8217;t want a catcher early, but is there a way to analyze if it makes sense? i hear you on the 85% of at bats, but it works the other way too.</p>
<p>isn&#8217;t it easier to find a decent hitting OF late? i&#8217;d expect that OF to hit for a higher average than your typical late catcher. </p>
<p>which early pick/late pick combo would you prefer:<br />
.300 catcher/.270 outfielder<br />
.270 catcher/.290 outfielder </p>
<p>considering scarcity of talent in a mid and late combo it might look more like:<br />
.300 C / .275 OF<br />
.265 C / .290 OF </p>
<p>both of them favor the early catcher. the second one by a lot. just making the point that 85% fewer at bats doesn&#8217;t bother me if the C is truly a better hitter than the OF available.   </p>
<p>runs and rbi, huge difference if your C is a team&#8217;s #3 hitter. didn&#8217;t build any data to compare other stats tho.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m really not trying to be difficult. only once can i remember drafting a C in the top 10 rounds myself (mccann in the 10th two years ago, similar case almost). </p>
<p>i just wonder at what point should we not turn one down&#8230;for example, i&#8217;d take joe mauer in the 7th inning. maybe earlier. now, for me, the question becomes &#8216;how much like joe mauer can wieters be?&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B-Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/#comment-9290</link>
		<dc:creator>B-Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6810#comment-9290</guid>
		<description>Surprisingly, he was my 4th round selection after the likes of Hanley (pick 2), Ryan Zimmerman, Justin Upton.  At the back end of the 4th for that matter (pick 47 to be exact).  That said, I wouldn&#039;t take him any higher than that.  

I took Wieters in the 7th round (pick 74 overall), after having filled C, 1B, SS, 3B, OF 1,  and SP 1.  Obviously every draft will be different, but considering I believe Wieters will perform close to the level of James projection of production, he seemed like a reasonable choice there.  Overall, I&#039;m pleased with how the roster looks, and I&#039;m curious to see the finished product looks.  

After boring you with the details of the mock, I&#039;ll just mention that while there are 30-40 HR guys around McCann, some of them have warts I&#039;m just not willing to deal with, namely guys like Adam Dunn and Carlos Pena.  That&#039;s a lot of BA damage.  There just seem to be few true locks for 30+ HR&#039;s that can contribute even neutrally to BA, that it seems sacrificing 30+ for 20-25 and a neutral to positive BA at a scarce position would be something to consider.  I hate to defend the catcher position, as I don&#039;t typically like to take one high given the inherent risk of injury, and the lack of AB&#039;s, but my thinking is changing a bit.   

As far as drafting guys who don&#039;t have a full season of solid contributions under their belt in the top 10 rounds,I don&#039;t make a habit of it, but circumstances will lead me to do so on occassion.  If a player is a blue chip prospect, has displayed a solid BB rate and a passable to good K rate in the high minors and limited time in the Majors I&#039;ll usually give consideration to that player in the 7-10 round range if need be to secure them.  Thanks for your thoughts so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprisingly, he was my 4th round selection after the likes of Hanley (pick 2), Ryan Zimmerman, Justin Upton.  At the back end of the 4th for that matter (pick 47 to be exact).  That said, I wouldn&#8217;t take him any higher than that.  </p>
<p>I took Wieters in the 7th round (pick 74 overall), after having filled C, 1B, SS, 3B, OF 1,  and SP 1.  Obviously every draft will be different, but considering I believe Wieters will perform close to the level of James projection of production, he seemed like a reasonable choice there.  Overall, I&#8217;m pleased with how the roster looks, and I&#8217;m curious to see the finished product looks.  </p>
<p>After boring you with the details of the mock, I&#8217;ll just mention that while there are 30-40 HR guys around McCann, some of them have warts I&#8217;m just not willing to deal with, namely guys like Adam Dunn and Carlos Pena.  That&#8217;s a lot of BA damage.  There just seem to be few true locks for 30+ HR&#8217;s that can contribute even neutrally to BA, that it seems sacrificing 30+ for 20-25 and a neutral to positive BA at a scarce position would be something to consider.  I hate to defend the catcher position, as I don&#8217;t typically like to take one high given the inherent risk of injury, and the lack of AB&#8217;s, but my thinking is changing a bit.   </p>
<p>As far as drafting guys who don&#8217;t have a full season of solid contributions under their belt in the top 10 rounds,I don&#8217;t make a habit of it, but circumstances will lead me to do so on occassion.  If a player is a blue chip prospect, has displayed a solid BB rate and a passable to good K rate in the high minors and limited time in the Majors I&#8217;ll usually give consideration to that player in the 7-10 round range if need be to secure them.  Thanks for your thoughts so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eno Sarris</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/#comment-9279</link>
		<dc:creator>Eno Sarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6810#comment-9279</guid>
		<description>1) Mike Napoli also has Jeff Mathis to deal with and last year&#039;s 389 ABs were a career high. He&#039;d have to be lucky to get to the 85% level (490). Any increase in playing time would give him a nudge up. 

2) If you are in the habit of taking guys in the first ten rounds that have never put together full seasons of solid production, and you take catchers before the late rounds, then Wieter&#039;s potential added ABs are certainly a plus. 

3) I&#039;ve seen that philosophy attempted myself. It&#039;s a bear. It&#039;s so much work finding out which catcher is playing, and you lose a roster spot that would often go to an injured star. You can start the year doing it, but once you have an injured star or two and you are looking at playing that second catcher at util, you&#039;ll stop trying to max out those ABs at catcher. I prefer to do it in the final month or two if I&#039;m injury-free and can afford to spend a spot on a part-time player. 

4) Good luck with that. McCann is a 20-HR guy going among the 30-40 HR guys. Picking him early will certainly cost you some ABs, Rs, HRs, RBIs on the other position players going around him. (Adam Lind, Justin Morneau and Ryan Zimmerman, for example).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Mike Napoli also has Jeff Mathis to deal with and last year&#8217;s 389 ABs were a career high. He&#8217;d have to be lucky to get to the 85% level (490). Any increase in playing time would give him a nudge up. </p>
<p>2) If you are in the habit of taking guys in the first ten rounds that have never put together full seasons of solid production, and you take catchers before the late rounds, then Wieter&#8217;s potential added ABs are certainly a plus. </p>
<p>3) I&#8217;ve seen that philosophy attempted myself. It&#8217;s a bear. It&#8217;s so much work finding out which catcher is playing, and you lose a roster spot that would often go to an injured star. You can start the year doing it, but once you have an injured star or two and you are looking at playing that second catcher at util, you&#8217;ll stop trying to max out those ABs at catcher. I prefer to do it in the final month or two if I&#8217;m injury-free and can afford to spend a spot on a part-time player. </p>
<p>4) Good luck with that. McCann is a 20-HR guy going among the 30-40 HR guys. Picking him early will certainly cost you some ABs, Rs, HRs, RBIs on the other position players going around him. (Adam Lind, Justin Morneau and Ryan Zimmerman, for example).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B-Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/#comment-9270</link>
		<dc:creator>B-Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6810#comment-9270</guid>
		<description>Couple questions Eno.  You touched on rare catchers who DH and accumulate more AB&#039;s than the standard 85% the rest get, and I&#039;m wondering if you can elaborate on the two situations:

1-  With Gary Matthews dealt, and Hideki Matsui interested in receiving some OF starts, would you bump Napoli up or down your rankings if it were announced he&#039;d get some starts at DH?  He is obviously a thumper, so it would allow more opportunities to hit HR&#039;s and accumulate counting stats, but it would also allow him a greater opportunity to hurt your BA.  Seeing as it&#039;s possible that Matsui may spell Rivera on occasion in the OF, and open up a DH spot for Napoli to man on a day off where Mathis starts, this seems like it could be a possibility.

2-  With the possibility of Wieters DH&#039;ing on his off days and thus receiving more opportunities to contribute positively in all stats (since his BA projects to be a positive, and any more AB&#039;s would obviously help all counting stats), shouldn&#039;t Wieters be valued about where he&#039;s being drafted?  He has a high ceiling, and seemingly high floor, and he should receive more AB&#039;s than his catching counterparts, including premier NL catcher McCann, and Victor Martinez (who isn&#039;t a lock to DH or man 1B much given the log jam at 1B/3B/DH for the Red Sox).  

Final question in a wordy post.  In roto leagues with daily changes, a medium sized bench, and a games played cap of 162 games per position, should any thought be given to getting a couple mid tiered catchers to accumulate all 162 games played at the position?  Or perhaps a thumper and an average guy (think AJ P and Napoli).  It really seems like a decent opportunity to get a slight leg up on the competition, but I&#039;ve never seen it fully explored.  

I&#039;m currently taking part in a mock draft at the fantasy baseball cafe with a 5x5 roto setting (in theory since it is a mock) and I&#039;m drafting as if it is daily changes, and a games played cap.  For the sake of interest, I took McCann and Wieters (1 catcher league, 1 utility, 3 OF, no IF, CI, MI)  to see what a team would look like going this route.  Thus far I&#039;m pleased with what I have (12 rounds in).  Like you, I like filling out my roster with SP, RP, OF late as there is a ton of depth at those positions.  Any thoughts would be appreciated.  Thanks, and fun article, enjoyable read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couple questions Eno.  You touched on rare catchers who DH and accumulate more AB&#8217;s than the standard 85% the rest get, and I&#8217;m wondering if you can elaborate on the two situations:</p>
<p>1-  With Gary Matthews dealt, and Hideki Matsui interested in receiving some OF starts, would you bump Napoli up or down your rankings if it were announced he&#8217;d get some starts at DH?  He is obviously a thumper, so it would allow more opportunities to hit HR&#8217;s and accumulate counting stats, but it would also allow him a greater opportunity to hurt your BA.  Seeing as it&#8217;s possible that Matsui may spell Rivera on occasion in the OF, and open up a DH spot for Napoli to man on a day off where Mathis starts, this seems like it could be a possibility.</p>
<p>2-  With the possibility of Wieters DH&#8217;ing on his off days and thus receiving more opportunities to contribute positively in all stats (since his BA projects to be a positive, and any more AB&#8217;s would obviously help all counting stats), shouldn&#8217;t Wieters be valued about where he&#8217;s being drafted?  He has a high ceiling, and seemingly high floor, and he should receive more AB&#8217;s than his catching counterparts, including premier NL catcher McCann, and Victor Martinez (who isn&#8217;t a lock to DH or man 1B much given the log jam at 1B/3B/DH for the Red Sox).  </p>
<p>Final question in a wordy post.  In roto leagues with daily changes, a medium sized bench, and a games played cap of 162 games per position, should any thought be given to getting a couple mid tiered catchers to accumulate all 162 games played at the position?  Or perhaps a thumper and an average guy (think AJ P and Napoli).  It really seems like a decent opportunity to get a slight leg up on the competition, but I&#8217;ve never seen it fully explored.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently taking part in a mock draft at the fantasy baseball cafe with a 5&#215;5 roto setting (in theory since it is a mock) and I&#8217;m drafting as if it is daily changes, and a games played cap.  For the sake of interest, I took McCann and Wieters (1 catcher league, 1 utility, 3 OF, no IF, CI, MI)  to see what a team would look like going this route.  Thus far I&#8217;m pleased with what I have (12 rounds in).  Like you, I like filling out my roster with SP, RP, OF late as there is a ton of depth at those positions.  Any thoughts would be appreciated.  Thanks, and fun article, enjoyable read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/#comment-9265</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6810#comment-9265</guid>
		<description>What about Alex Avila in a deep league? I know Detroit already has Laird, so playing time might be hard to come by, though Laird can&#039;t hit at all. Avila batted .279 with 5 HR, 14 RBI and a .590 SLG in only 61 bats (small sample size) at the MLB level, though he still hit well and showed power at Double A in 2009. If he was able to get playing time, what do you think of him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Alex Avila in a deep league? I know Detroit already has Laird, so playing time might be hard to come by, though Laird can&#8217;t hit at all. Avila batted .279 with 5 HR, 14 RBI and a .590 SLG in only 61 bats (small sample size) at the MLB level, though he still hit well and showed power at Double A in 2009. If he was able to get playing time, what do you think of him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/adp-values-at-catcher/#comment-9253</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6810#comment-9253</guid>
		<description>Navarro is currently listed as the starter on the Rays&#039; official site. I&#039;m not sure how much that means at this point, but Shoppach is the listed backup, so they&#039;ve definitely updated it since Shoppach came over...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Navarro is currently listed as the starter on the Rays&#8217; official site. I&#8217;m not sure how much that means at this point, but Shoppach is the listed backup, so they&#8217;ve definitely updated it since Shoppach came over&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

