<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avoid the Riot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/</link>
	<description>Daily fantasy baseball analysis and strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:59:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/#comment-2891</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 16:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1109#comment-2891</guid>
		<description>NVM, just noticed the time of the original comment ::facepalm::</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NVM, just noticed the time of the original comment ::facepalm::</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 21:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1109#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>What does Edwin Jackson have to do with anything? His BABIP isn&#039;t that ridiculous (.270)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does Edwin Jackson have to do with anything? His BABIP isn&#8217;t that ridiculous (.270)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff W.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/#comment-2801</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1109#comment-2801</guid>
		<description>That should read &quot;[i]in nearly 1600 big-league plate appearances . . . .&quot;  Theriot has over 1400 AB in about 1600 PA in the bigs.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should read &#8220;[i]in nearly 1600 big-league plate appearances . . . .&#8221;  Theriot has over 1400 AB in about 1600 PA in the bigs.  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff W.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/#comment-2798</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1109#comment-2798</guid>
		<description>Peter:

Again, I am also late to this party but I wanted to make a note about Theriot&#039;s minor-league numbers that you overlook -- and its the difference between looking at pure numbers versus having seen the guy play and being familiar with his bio.

As a minor leaguer, the Cubs were trying to train Theriot, a natural righty, to become a switch hitter.  He took a lot of at bats from the &quot;wrong&quot; side of the plate.  By the time he worked his way up to AA, he finally had a talk with the coaches and told them he was not really comfortable hitting as a lefty, and they let him hit exclusively as a right-handed hitter.

Hitting from the &quot;correct&quot; side (for him), his average spiked and he eventually emerged as an everyday big-league player.  I can&#039;t find his LH/RH minor-league hitting splits (granted, I haven&#039;t looked that hard) but I know he started hitting from the right-hand side pretty exclusively in AAA, where he was a .304 BA / .367 OBP guy in 312 PA.

Long story short, I think your projection of him as a .270-ish hitter is inaccurate because you took into account all those left-handed at-bats.  Theriot is not a left-handed hitter or a switch hitter, he is a natural RH hitter, and has demonstrated that he can hit  in the .285-.295 range when batting as a righty.

In nearly 1600 big-league at bats, certainly a legitimate sample size, he&#039;s a career .289 hitter.  That seems about right to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter:</p>
<p>Again, I am also late to this party but I wanted to make a note about Theriot&#8217;s minor-league numbers that you overlook &#8212; and its the difference between looking at pure numbers versus having seen the guy play and being familiar with his bio.</p>
<p>As a minor leaguer, the Cubs were trying to train Theriot, a natural righty, to become a switch hitter.  He took a lot of at bats from the &#8220;wrong&#8221; side of the plate.  By the time he worked his way up to AA, he finally had a talk with the coaches and told them he was not really comfortable hitting as a lefty, and they let him hit exclusively as a right-handed hitter.</p>
<p>Hitting from the &#8220;correct&#8221; side (for him), his average spiked and he eventually emerged as an everyday big-league player.  I can&#8217;t find his LH/RH minor-league hitting splits (granted, I haven&#8217;t looked that hard) but I know he started hitting from the right-hand side pretty exclusively in AAA, where he was a .304 BA / .367 OBP guy in 312 PA.</p>
<p>Long story short, I think your projection of him as a .270-ish hitter is inaccurate because you took into account all those left-handed at-bats.  Theriot is not a left-handed hitter or a switch hitter, he is a natural RH hitter, and has demonstrated that he can hit  in the .285-.295 range when batting as a righty.</p>
<p>In nearly 1600 big-league at bats, certainly a legitimate sample size, he&#8217;s a career .289 hitter.  That seems about right to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Po</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/#comment-2269</link>
		<dc:creator>Po</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1109#comment-2269</guid>
		<description>I know I am about 3 months late to the party but I have a question about the expected BABIP.

If a batters LD% jumps from 21.0% to 23.2% and their GB% jumps from 48.6% to 56.6% and their FB% rate drops from 30.5% to 20.2% how can their xBABIP drop from .311 to .291.

That makes absolutely zero sense to me.  If he increased the two things with the higher BABIP and lowered the one with a lower BABIP wouldnt his xBABIP raise not lower?

I thought the 2008 Theriot was the Theriot we would see on a regular basis not the 2007 based on 2007&#039;s BABIP.  Maybe I am missing something, but if anyone could clarify that would be super.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I am about 3 months late to the party but I have a question about the expected BABIP.</p>
<p>If a batters LD% jumps from 21.0% to 23.2% and their GB% jumps from 48.6% to 56.6% and their FB% rate drops from 30.5% to 20.2% how can their xBABIP drop from .311 to .291.</p>
<p>That makes absolutely zero sense to me.  If he increased the two things with the higher BABIP and lowered the one with a lower BABIP wouldnt his xBABIP raise not lower?</p>
<p>I thought the 2008 Theriot was the Theriot we would see on a regular basis not the 2007 based on 2007&#8242;s BABIP.  Maybe I am missing something, but if anyone could clarify that would be super.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ender</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Ender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1109#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>An upgrade in GB% would also come with an upgrade in BABIP, of course it also would come wtih an upgrade in xBABIP...

More times than not jumps in BABIP are just random fluctuations and fantasy baseball is all about playing the percentages so the original article doesn&#039;t have anything wrong with it.  Also the mention of how poor Theriot is at stealing has a lot of merit since they won&#039;t keep sending him if he is that bad again next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An upgrade in GB% would also come with an upgrade in BABIP, of course it also would come wtih an upgrade in xBABIP&#8230;</p>
<p>More times than not jumps in BABIP are just random fluctuations and fantasy baseball is all about playing the percentages so the original article doesn&#8217;t have anything wrong with it.  Also the mention of how poor Theriot is at stealing has a lot of merit since they won&#8217;t keep sending him if he is that bad again next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nilodnayr</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>nilodnayr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1109#comment-571</guid>
		<description>What can be seen by Theriot&#039;s &quot;change in approach&quot; is that he has basically given up all hope for any power.  Look at his batted ball data in 08 compared to 07.  His FB% dropped from 30% to 20% (lowest in baseball).  That appears to have been a fundamental change.  Since Theriot hits for such little power, I&#039;d imagine that his FBs are converted to outs at a higher than average rate, so that tradeoff should have a positive real affect on his BABIP.  If you apply some of the models that multiply GB, FB, and LD by constants, Theriot&#039;s 2008 eBABIP and BABIP are pretty inline.

Models are good an all, but as you mentioned in your original post, some guys just don&#039;t fit. Theriot seems to be one of those guys.  I&#039;d guess one reason is that Theriot gets dinged for being retarded on the bases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can be seen by Theriot&#8217;s &#8220;change in approach&#8221; is that he has basically given up all hope for any power.  Look at his batted ball data in 08 compared to 07.  His FB% dropped from 30% to 20% (lowest in baseball).  That appears to have been a fundamental change.  Since Theriot hits for such little power, I&#8217;d imagine that his FBs are converted to outs at a higher than average rate, so that tradeoff should have a positive real affect on his BABIP.  If you apply some of the models that multiply GB, FB, and LD by constants, Theriot&#8217;s 2008 eBABIP and BABIP are pretty inline.</p>
<p>Models are good an all, but as you mentioned in your original post, some guys just don&#8217;t fit. Theriot seems to be one of those guys.  I&#8217;d guess one reason is that Theriot gets dinged for being retarded on the bases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 05:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1109#comment-528</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t miss it. I ignored it because he&#039;s had two full, healthy seasons since then and still hasn&#039;t been able to come close to replicating his 2005 success on any front. See my response to Jim below for more.

I also didn&#039;t mean to imply that there wasn&#039;t a change in Lee&#039;s approach. I caught a a Cubs game on ESPN in 2005 where he credited that year&#039;s success to an opening of his stance that allowed him to see the ball better, which is the only reason I was even aware of it.

And yes, the fact that there are constant adjustments and counter-adjustments is exactly the point that I clumsily tried to make. Batters and pitchers make changes all the time that lead to short term successes but don&#039;t necessarily augur continued success in the future. &quot;I make adjustments to you and then you make adjustments to me and now we&#039;re back to where we started from&quot; is the long and short of it. 

You know, if you had just quoted Miles and Brenley in the first place, we could have avoided this whole situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t miss it. I ignored it because he&#8217;s had two full, healthy seasons since then and still hasn&#8217;t been able to come close to replicating his 2005 success on any front. See my response to Jim below for more.</p>
<p>I also didn&#8217;t mean to imply that there wasn&#8217;t a change in Lee&#8217;s approach. I caught a a Cubs game on ESPN in 2005 where he credited that year&#8217;s success to an opening of his stance that allowed him to see the ball better, which is the only reason I was even aware of it.</p>
<p>And yes, the fact that there are constant adjustments and counter-adjustments is exactly the point that I clumsily tried to make. Batters and pitchers make changes all the time that lead to short term successes but don&#8217;t necessarily augur continued success in the future. &#8220;I make adjustments to you and then you make adjustments to me and now we&#8217;re back to where we started from&#8221; is the long and short of it. </p>
<p>You know, if you had just quoted Miles and Brenley in the first place, we could have avoided this whole situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 05:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1109#comment-526</guid>
		<description>&quot;Brian has always had excellent plate discipline, but he had power back in the day. He also plays in a terrible park for homeruns. I really don’t think he and Ryan Theriot have much in common.&quot;

What I wrote was this: &quot;When you think of Ryan Theriot, think of Mark Grace or Brian Giles with no power, because that’s the kind of hitter Ryan Theriot is trying to be.&quot;

I made the point that Theriot has no power and they do have something in common.

Here are the top five hitters in terms of cantact percentage:
1. Brian Giles, 92.8%
2. Placido Polanco, 92.7%
3. Dustin Padroia, 92.3%
4. Ryan Theriot, 91.9%
5. Marco Scutaro, 92.5%

Theriot is the 26th best in MLB at not swinging at pitches outside the zone, only swinging at pitches outside of the zone 19.4% of the time.

Of those players who were better at making contact with the baseball than Theriot (Giles, Polanco, Padroia) only one of them swung at pitches outside of the zone less than Theriot, Brian Giles at 17.4%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Brian has always had excellent plate discipline, but he had power back in the day. He also plays in a terrible park for homeruns. I really don’t think he and Ryan Theriot have much in common.&#8221;</p>
<p>What I wrote was this: &#8220;When you think of Ryan Theriot, think of Mark Grace or Brian Giles with no power, because that’s the kind of hitter Ryan Theriot is trying to be.&#8221;</p>
<p>I made the point that Theriot has no power and they do have something in common.</p>
<p>Here are the top five hitters in terms of cantact percentage:<br />
1. Brian Giles, 92.8%<br />
2. Placido Polanco, 92.7%<br />
3. Dustin Padroia, 92.3%<br />
4. Ryan Theriot, 91.9%<br />
5. Marco Scutaro, 92.5%</p>
<p>Theriot is the 26th best in MLB at not swinging at pitches outside the zone, only swinging at pitches outside of the zone 19.4% of the time.</p>
<p>Of those players who were better at making contact with the baseball than Theriot (Giles, Polanco, Padroia) only one of them swung at pitches outside of the zone less than Theriot, Brian Giles at 17.4%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/avoid-the-riot/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 04:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1109#comment-525</guid>
		<description>Well, his wrist was certainly healthy enough to let him post a .259 IsoP in the 106 games spanning July 13, 2007 to May 12, 2008, so I don&#039;t think you can really chalk up the .139 IsoP he posted from May 13 on to a bad wrist barring testimony from Lee or those around him. 

As for the other, Matt said Giles *without* the power, which actually isn&#039;t a bad comparison at all. Neither chase too many balls out of the zone and their Z-Swing, O-Contact and Z-Contact are all rather similar. The only major difference aside from O-Swing is that since Theriot won&#039;t hurt you with power, pitchers are able to pound the strike zone against him, depressing his walk rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, his wrist was certainly healthy enough to let him post a .259 IsoP in the 106 games spanning July 13, 2007 to May 12, 2008, so I don&#8217;t think you can really chalk up the .139 IsoP he posted from May 13 on to a bad wrist barring testimony from Lee or those around him. </p>
<p>As for the other, Matt said Giles *without* the power, which actually isn&#8217;t a bad comparison at all. Neither chase too many balls out of the zone and their Z-Swing, O-Contact and Z-Contact are all rather similar. The only major difference aside from O-Swing is that since Theriot won&#8217;t hurt you with power, pitchers are able to pound the strike zone against him, depressing his walk rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

