FanGraphs Logo

Boston Finds a Penny

Entering the 2008 season, right-hander Brad Penny likely had free agent riches in his sights. The 30 year-old had posted a sub-four Fielding Independent ERA (FIP) for five straight seasons, including a 2007 campaign in which he topped the 200-inning mark for the first time since 2001. With another strong showing Penny figured to snag a pretty penny, securing a long-term pact paying an annual salary in the eight-figure range.

Those hopes of a lavish multi-year deal never materialized, however, as Penny dealt with a shoulder injury that placed him on the 15-day DL three separate times: “mild tendinitis” in June, “shoulder inflammation” in August, and “shoulder soreness” in August.

In between that trio of trips to the DL, a less-than optimal Penny turned in his worst season as a professional. Tossing just 94.2 frames, the 2006 NL All-Star starter punched out less than five batters per nine innings while walking about four per nine. Combined with an elevated home run rate (1.24 per nine), Penny posted a 5.27 FIP. Penny’s fastball velocity was down a tick from 2007 (from 93.4 MPH to 92.4 MPH), and the speed of his heater jumped around quite a bit during the summer months as he tried to pitch through his shoulder ailment:

June: 94.1 MPH
(DL stint)
August: 89.6 MPH
(DL stint)
September: 92.8 MPH
(DL stint)

Take a look at these clips from the Baseball-Intellect website. One shows Penny unleashing a 97 MPH fastball in a May 13th start versus Milwaukee, while the other shows Brad more or less lobbing a 90 MPH pitch August 8th against San Francisco. Cleary, Penny’s shoulder was bothering him a great deal. It’s difficult to argue with R.J. Anderson, who suggests that it would have been in the best interests of both the free-agent-to-be and the Dodgers for Penny to have shut it down far earlier than he did.

Penny was forced to take a one-year deal following his injury-wracked season, inking a one-year, $5 million contract with the Red Sox that includes an additional $3 million in possible incentives. Let’s assume for the time being that Penny reports to spring training in good health. The 6-4, 260 pounder has never posted ace-like peripherals, but his league-average K rate (6.36 K/9), decent control (2.93 BB/9) and mild groundball tendencies (48.7 GB% in ’07, 49.1% in ’08) have allowed him to post a very useful 3.95 career FIP.

Marcel projects a 4.11 FIP out of Penny in 127 innings, meaning that Brad would surrender about 58 runs. A replacement-level starter (with a 5.50 FIP) would give up about 77.6 runs in the same number of innings. Penny’s 19.6 runs above replacement (1.96 WAR) would make him worth about $9.4 million, using a scale of $4.8 million per WAR. In other words, Brad would be well worth his salary, even if he didn’t hit the 160-inning threshold that kickstarts his incentive money. Bringing in a solid starter like Penny on a one-year deal was a shrewd move by an organization that makes plenty of intelligent decisions. If Penny makes a full season’s worth of starts, he’ll be an outright steal.

If Penny’s shoulder heals, he could be a nice bargain on draft day. Some owners might have a sour taste in their mouths from his 2008 work, but the big righty is certainly worth tracking during the offseason. If the medical reports sound promising, give some thought to picking up a Penny for your fantasy squad.




Print This Post

A recent graduate of Duquesne University, David Golebiewski is a contributing writer for Fangraphs, The Pittsburgh Sports Report and Baseball Analytics. His work for Inside Edge Scouting Services has appeared on ESPN.com and Yahoo.com, and he was a fantasy baseball columnist for Rotoworld from 2009-2010. He recently contributed an article on Mike Stanton's slugging to The Hardball Times Annual 2012. Contact David at david.golebiewski@gmail.com and check out his work at Journalist For Hire.

9 Responses to “Boston Finds a Penny”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Click here to view comments in a non-threaded output.
  1. D Wrek says:

    For Penny to sign for only 5mil kind of blows my mind. I wonder why another team wouldnt want to trump this to try and catch lighting in a bottle (IE the Cardinals)? IMaybe teams were really turned off by his med reports?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Tony says:

    Do these Marcel projects account for the switch in leagues and park?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. David Golebiewski says:

    Tony,

    No, they do not account for the shift to the AL. I didn’t alter anything with Penny’s projection though because his projected FIP is already somewhat above his career norm. Marcel takes 3-year data and regresses it, so Penny was already “penalized” for his poor work in 2008.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Matt says:

    I’d temper my enthusiam. Look at Beckett’s first season in the AL east, he was hit pretty hard, and Fenway sure didn’t help.

    Penny coming from a pitchers park to a pretty solid hitters park and the NL to the AL is gonna hurt. Plus I have never been impressed with his peripherals, and the low(ish) K rate along with a pedestrian GB rate is gonna make for a long season.

    I’d wait for the waiver wire, if at all.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. Jim says:

    Beckett didn’t have problems because of the league switch….he had problems because of the way he was pitching. Yes, pitchers may see a slight downturn in stats after a trip to the AL, but not everyone puts up numbers like Beckett in their first year in the AL.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. Matt says:

    Beckett has had a pretty consistent ‘pitch count’ if you will. He has thrown the fastball nearly the same % each season, in fact, outside of reducing his usage of the change-up for more curve balls, he is the exact same pitcher he was always been.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. Jim says:

    It also has to do with bad luck. He allowed 36 homeruns that year, double what he has done any other year. His HR/FB% was also nearly double it has been any other year. That obviously had nothing to do with his switch from the AL to the NL.

    Even if Beckett did have that much trouble, he is an extreme case of the AL/NL example.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. Matt says:

    Definitely bad luck, sorta like Lackey this year in terms of FB/HR %. But facing an extra hitter (hopefully league avg) as opposed to a pitcher (think Randy Johnson!) each time through the lineup is always a different task.

    Heck, look at Roger Clemens. He was average with the Yanks, but had a sub 2.00 with the Astros…

    The AL/NL is definitely a concern for a career NL pitcher, in a pitchers park, in a pitchers division. The AL East is NO joke. Especially now that the Yanks are deep in hitting again.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  9. Diony says:

    What about Bill James predictions?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




Player Linker - Contact Us - Advertise - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy