<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cards Closer Candidate: Jason Motte</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/cards-closer-candidate-jason-motte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/cards-closer-candidate-jason-motte/</link>
	<description>Daily fantasy baseball analysis and strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:15:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/cards-closer-candidate-jason-motte/#comment-2021</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1668#comment-2021</guid>
		<description>14.8 K/9, 4.2 K/BB in 66 IPs at AAA.  Had a 3.24 ERA and only gave up 64 hits despite a gaudy .426 BABIP!  His FIP was 2.29.  Even showed he could get MLB hitters out for a short spell last season and given his spring success so far he could be a real gem.

I am not going to annoint him just yet, but this guy could be the best closer (peripherals, maybe not save totals) in the NL this season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14.8 K/9, 4.2 K/BB in 66 IPs at AAA.  Had a 3.24 ERA and only gave up 64 hits despite a gaudy .426 BABIP!  His FIP was 2.29.  Even showed he could get MLB hitters out for a short spell last season and given his spring success so far he could be a real gem.</p>
<p>I am not going to annoint him just yet, but this guy could be the best closer (peripherals, maybe not save totals) in the NL this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Wrek</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/cards-closer-candidate-jason-motte/#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>D Wrek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1668#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>Good points Sam and Rick.

Just a thought.  I know TLR led the charge with the 9th inning specialists (see Echersley). But if there was ever a manger to start a season with the dreaded &#039;closer by commitee&#039; wouldnt it be LaRussa?  This guy is king of making the bull pen switch, playing the match ups, using as many releivers as he dang well pleases., etc etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Sam and Rick.</p>
<p>Just a thought.  I know TLR led the charge with the 9th inning specialists (see Echersley). But if there was ever a manger to start a season with the dreaded &#8216;closer by commitee&#8217; wouldnt it be LaRussa?  This guy is king of making the bull pen switch, playing the match ups, using as many releivers as he dang well pleases., etc etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/cards-closer-candidate-jason-motte/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 09:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1668#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>NO RYAN FRANKLIN.  please Tony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO RYAN FRANKLIN.  please Tony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/cards-closer-candidate-jason-motte/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=1668#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>Very well written analysis. The only point I would make is that LaRussa has made it clear that he prefers experience to raw stuff. I think that gives Perez a big advantage going into the season because he was in STL nearly all of 2008 while Motte was just there in September. Perez also got a chance to close and went a respectable 7 of 9 in those opps, which was the best percentage on the team last year. I think that experience gives Perez a big leg up. Based on LaRussa&#039;s history and comments, I really can&#039;t see him giving the closer job to a rookie to start the season, so I see Perez getting the nod, but if he falters and the organization feels Carpenter should be starting, then Motte may get a chance. However, in all likelihood that will only happen in the second half (with more experience), as I think even Franklin will get a shot first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well written analysis. The only point I would make is that LaRussa has made it clear that he prefers experience to raw stuff. I think that gives Perez a big advantage going into the season because he was in STL nearly all of 2008 while Motte was just there in September. Perez also got a chance to close and went a respectable 7 of 9 in those opps, which was the best percentage on the team last year. I think that experience gives Perez a big leg up. Based on LaRussa&#8217;s history and comments, I really can&#8217;t see him giving the closer job to a rookie to start the season, so I see Perez getting the nod, but if he falters and the organization feels Carpenter should be starting, then Motte may get a chance. However, in all likelihood that will only happen in the second half (with more experience), as I think even Franklin will get a shot first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

