<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Check the Position: SP2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/</link>
	<description>Daily fantasy baseball analysis and strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:47:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamC</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/#comment-23523</link>
		<dc:creator>SamC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6827#comment-23523</guid>
		<description>Kershaw is looking like #1 on this list right now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kershaw is looking like #1 on this list right now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B N</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/#comment-17269</link>
		<dc:creator>B N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 19:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6827#comment-17269</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure of it, myself.  Verlander has a HR/FB rate of about 8% vs 11% for Nolasco.  Similarly, Verlander has a career GB rate that is about 42% vs 38% for Nolasco.

So... Nolasco is going to give up more fly balls AND they&#039;re more likely to leave the park?  I&#039;d say that&#039;s something serious to choose between them.  Plus Verlander seems likely to strike out an extra +0.5-1 K/9.  That would seem pretty significant too.  I&#039;m hardly a Verlander fanboy, I feel he&#039;s a bit inconsistent for an ace, but Nolasco shows notably worse performance on a couple of key skills (strikeouts and keeping the ball in the park).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure of it, myself.  Verlander has a HR/FB rate of about 8% vs 11% for Nolasco.  Similarly, Verlander has a career GB rate that is about 42% vs 38% for Nolasco.</p>
<p>So&#8230; Nolasco is going to give up more fly balls AND they&#8217;re more likely to leave the park?  I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s something serious to choose between them.  Plus Verlander seems likely to strike out an extra +0.5-1 K/9.  That would seem pretty significant too.  I&#8217;m hardly a Verlander fanboy, I feel he&#8217;s a bit inconsistent for an ace, but Nolasco shows notably worse performance on a couple of key skills (strikeouts and keeping the ball in the park).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaw</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/#comment-11403</link>
		<dc:creator>jaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6827#comment-11403</guid>
		<description>sorry about the typo:

&quot;. . . I wonder if Jimenz will be better over the next 4 years.&quot;

[fixed!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry about the typo:</p>
<p>&#8220;. . . I wonder if Jimenz will be better over the next 4 years.&#8221;</p>
<p>[fixed!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaw</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/#comment-11401</link>
		<dc:creator>jaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6827#comment-11401</guid>
		<description>It obviously depends heavily on your leagues&#039; scoring/settings, but I think just about everybody needs 6 SP, and your first 3 are good enough that if you spend a middling amount of dollars on some vets, you&#039;ll have at least a solid staff this year.

You already have 2 potentially great upside plays there with Nolaskco and Hanson, and Gallardo is at least going to give you at ton of Ks, and he could be a #2 fantasy SP pretty quickly.

If it was me, I would just roll the dice with the staff you have so far  (no, that doesn&#039;t mean draft Dice-K). I mean I think your upside plays could really make getting an uberace a bit redundant. All pitching is risky.

On the other hand . . . 

There is risk and their is RISK. The beauty of Doc Halladay is that he&#039;s been so consistent -- if you count in length of track record, etc., there is an argument to be made that Halladay is right on par with Lincecum -- elite #s, lots of IP, very limited risk of missing starts or going through long slumps. So Halladay is a special case, because he is as close to a lock as you can get with a SP

If you get Halladay, you can fill in your last 2 SP VERY cheaply with a good ratio guy (like maybe Kuroda?) and another late flyer (another good ratio-controlling vet?)

I still think your pitching is good enough, given the inherent risk in the position, but Halladay is a special case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It obviously depends heavily on your leagues&#8217; scoring/settings, but I think just about everybody needs 6 SP, and your first 3 are good enough that if you spend a middling amount of dollars on some vets, you&#8217;ll have at least a solid staff this year.</p>
<p>You already have 2 potentially great upside plays there with Nolaskco and Hanson, and Gallardo is at least going to give you at ton of Ks, and he could be a #2 fantasy SP pretty quickly.</p>
<p>If it was me, I would just roll the dice with the staff you have so far  (no, that doesn&#8217;t mean draft Dice-K). I mean I think your upside plays could really make getting an uberace a bit redundant. All pitching is risky.</p>
<p>On the other hand . . . </p>
<p>There is risk and their is RISK. The beauty of Doc Halladay is that he&#8217;s been so consistent &#8212; if you count in length of track record, etc., there is an argument to be made that Halladay is right on par with Lincecum &#8212; elite #s, lots of IP, very limited risk of missing starts or going through long slumps. So Halladay is a special case, because he is as close to a lock as you can get with a SP</p>
<p>If you get Halladay, you can fill in your last 2 SP VERY cheaply with a good ratio guy (like maybe Kuroda?) and another late flyer (another good ratio-controlling vet?)</p>
<p>I still think your pitching is good enough, given the inherent risk in the position, but Halladay is a special case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaw</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/#comment-11397</link>
		<dc:creator>jaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6827#comment-11397</guid>
		<description>Assume for sake of argument you already have 2 SP who are good bets for #1 or have #1 upside — say, Adam Wainwright and Tommy Hanson.

Is that enough for now? Or would still take an early round pick on, say, Cole Hamels or Ubaldo Jimenez, and wait until a later round to take someone like, say, Brett Anderson, Baker, or maybe even Price as your #3 SP?

Also, I like Hamels more for 2010, but I wonder if Jimenez will be actually be better for the next 4 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assume for sake of argument you already have 2 SP who are good bets for #1 or have #1 upside — say, Adam Wainwright and Tommy Hanson.</p>
<p>Is that enough for now? Or would still take an early round pick on, say, Cole Hamels or Ubaldo Jimenez, and wait until a later round to take someone like, say, Brett Anderson, Baker, or maybe even Price as your #3 SP?</p>
<p>Also, I like Hamels more for 2010, but I wonder if Jimenez will be actually be better for the next 4 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/#comment-11367</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 23:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6827#comment-11367</guid>
		<description>http://www.fangraphs.com/forums/topic.php?id=3470</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/forums/topic.php?id=3470" rel="nofollow">http://www.fangraphs.com/forums/topic.php?id=3470</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaptrap19</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/#comment-11110</link>
		<dc:creator>kaptrap19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6827#comment-11110</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t trust Clayton Kershaw

http://gameofinches.blogspot.com/2010/02/luckiest-fly-ball-pitcher.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t trust Clayton Kershaw</p>
<p><a href="http://gameofinches.blogspot.com/2010/02/luckiest-fly-ball-pitcher.html" rel="nofollow">http://gameofinches.blogspot.com/2010/02/luckiest-fly-ball-pitcher.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 20/20vision</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/#comment-9452</link>
		<dc:creator>20/20vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6827#comment-9452</guid>
		<description>Brett Anderson=next Verducci rule victim? 

I know we&#039;re all enamored by the peripherals, but that was quite the increase for a 22 year old...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett Anderson=next Verducci rule victim? </p>
<p>I know we&#8217;re all enamored by the peripherals, but that was quite the increase for a 22 year old&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bballer319</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/#comment-9417</link>
		<dc:creator>bballer319</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6827#comment-9417</guid>
		<description>Where would Ben Sheets now fit into the conversation Eno?  Any thoughts given his &quot;healthy&quot; diagnosis for the likely amount of work he&#039;ll receive this year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where would Ben Sheets now fit into the conversation Eno?  Any thoughts given his &#8220;healthy&#8221; diagnosis for the likely amount of work he&#8217;ll receive this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/check-the-position-sp2/#comment-9405</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=6827#comment-9405</guid>
		<description>Tommy Hanson is a stud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy Hanson is a stud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

