<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daric Barton&#8217;s Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/</link>
	<description>Daily fantasy baseball analysis and strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: divakar</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/#comment-6826</link>
		<dc:creator>divakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=5070#comment-6826</guid>
		<description>I should clarify something: Youks, to me, is an outlier not because he generated late-blooming power from his patient approach. Like I said, I&#039;d guess that happens for patient hitters reasonably frequently. That&#039;s also why I like Barton so much...

Youks is an outlier because his approach is RIDICULOUSLY patient. Comparing anyone (Barton included) to Youks is risky - you rarely see such patience in young hitters. 

Most observers couldn&#039;t predict Youks power developing as it has, but everyone agreed he had all-time plate discipline.

I am hoping Barton can emulate that arc - but using Youks as a comparison is something a lot of stat guys find irresponsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should clarify something: Youks, to me, is an outlier not because he generated late-blooming power from his patient approach. Like I said, I&#8217;d guess that happens for patient hitters reasonably frequently. That&#8217;s also why I like Barton so much&#8230;</p>
<p>Youks is an outlier because his approach is RIDICULOUSLY patient. Comparing anyone (Barton included) to Youks is risky &#8211; you rarely see such patience in young hitters. </p>
<p>Most observers couldn&#8217;t predict Youks power developing as it has, but everyone agreed he had all-time plate discipline.</p>
<p>I am hoping Barton can emulate that arc &#8211; but using Youks as a comparison is something a lot of stat guys find irresponsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: divakar</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/#comment-6825</link>
		<dc:creator>divakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=5070#comment-6825</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I&#039;d guess too.

But I really am just guessing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;d guess too.</p>
<p>But I really am just guessing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/#comment-6822</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=5070#comment-6822</guid>
		<description>Just how out of the norm is a Youklis-type arc? There&#039;s so much expectation put on players at certain ages/levels, but perhaps some guys just develop differently. 

Seems the odds of a disciplined hitter growing into power is much better than a raw-power hitter growing into discipline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just how out of the norm is a Youklis-type arc? There&#8217;s so much expectation put on players at certain ages/levels, but perhaps some guys just develop differently. </p>
<p>Seems the odds of a disciplined hitter growing into power is much better than a raw-power hitter growing into discipline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: divakar</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/#comment-6304</link>
		<dc:creator>divakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=5070#comment-6304</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true DG is killing with these writeups.

Keep &#039;em coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true DG is killing with these writeups.</p>
<p>Keep &#8216;em coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: divakar</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/#comment-6303</link>
		<dc:creator>divakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=5070#comment-6303</guid>
		<description>Again, this &quot;mold&quot; isn&#039;t bad - it&#039;s just under-selling Barton a bit. And Nick Johnson, if I&#039;m reading this correctly.

I do like Loney and Kotchman. I don&#039;t see them as better than Barton, but I could see them as low-end projections: as in, if Barton doesn&#039;t develop any more power, he should still be better than those guys. I&#039;m still optimistic about Barton&#039;s skilset, in comparison to theirs.

http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=5928&amp;playerid2=4556&amp;playerid3=1930&amp;position=1B&amp;page=3&amp;type=full

James Loney had a .350 BABIP at age 23 - so take that season with a grain of salt.

Nick Johnson: I hate discussing his career because of what it *could* have been... But this is more like what I&#039;m saying for Daric Barton:

http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=5928&amp;playerid2=4556&amp;playerid3=828&amp;position=1B&amp;page=8&amp;type=full

I see Barton on the Nick Johnson express elevator: great walk rates, great OBP (better than Nick), good enough contact rates, and developing power leading to a *hopefully* decent ISO to go with everything else. That would add up to a wOBA like what Johnson SHOULD have put up in his prime years: 380-390. 

That would be top 35 in the majors.

It will take an increase in power to get there, for sure, but that&#039;s the whole point of this discussion - I&#039;m speculating that his ceiling has to be set with power as a possibility, not projecting off what he&#039;s done until now, only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, this &#8220;mold&#8221; isn&#8217;t bad &#8211; it&#8217;s just under-selling Barton a bit. And Nick Johnson, if I&#8217;m reading this correctly.</p>
<p>I do like Loney and Kotchman. I don&#8217;t see them as better than Barton, but I could see them as low-end projections: as in, if Barton doesn&#8217;t develop any more power, he should still be better than those guys. I&#8217;m still optimistic about Barton&#8217;s skilset, in comparison to theirs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=5928&amp;playerid2=4556&amp;playerid3=1930&amp;position=1B&amp;page=3&amp;type=full" rel="nofollow">http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=5928&amp;playerid2=4556&amp;playerid3=1930&amp;position=1B&amp;page=3&amp;type=full</a></p>
<p>James Loney had a .350 BABIP at age 23 &#8211; so take that season with a grain of salt.</p>
<p>Nick Johnson: I hate discussing his career because of what it *could* have been&#8230; But this is more like what I&#8217;m saying for Daric Barton:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=5928&amp;playerid2=4556&amp;playerid3=828&amp;position=1B&amp;page=8&amp;type=full" rel="nofollow">http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=5928&amp;playerid2=4556&amp;playerid3=828&amp;position=1B&amp;page=8&amp;type=full</a></p>
<p>I see Barton on the Nick Johnson express elevator: great walk rates, great OBP (better than Nick), good enough contact rates, and developing power leading to a *hopefully* decent ISO to go with everything else. That would add up to a wOBA like what Johnson SHOULD have put up in his prime years: 380-390. </p>
<p>That would be top 35 in the majors.</p>
<p>It will take an increase in power to get there, for sure, but that&#8217;s the whole point of this discussion &#8211; I&#8217;m speculating that his ceiling has to be set with power as a possibility, not projecting off what he&#8217;s done until now, only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: divakar</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/#comment-6302</link>
		<dc:creator>divakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=5070#comment-6302</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with Grace as a high-end comp. I know it was &quot;lazy&quot; but I&#039;ll take the bait anyway :-)

Mark Grace, as I see it, is a fan favorite - and that often over-values his (actually) very valuable production. I love Mark Grace for what he provided: he was a fantastic hitter in many ways. If Barton becomes Grace, I&#039;d be very happy in terms of production... 

Since we cannot expect a career as long as Grace&#039;s I&#039;ll concede that it will be difficult to match Grace&#039;s career-long productivity... So, if you&#039;re saying that Grace is a ceiling for overall career value, I&#039;ll give you that (and you can stop reading!)

Having said that, Grace cannot be a high-end comp for offense at this stage in Barton&#039;s career. Barton&#039;s ml bb% is over 15% as compared to Grace who was around 10%. That is dramatic. And Barton has done most of that when he was young for his leagues... 

And if you just want to look at ML performance, despite Barton&#039;s age and SSS, compare them right here on Fangraphs:

First BB%... then ISO. BB% is self-explanatory, and somewhat shocking - couple it to OBP and I think you&#039;ll see Barton has a different skillset than Grace, even at this early stage of his career. 

http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=56&amp;playerid2=5928&amp;playerid3=&amp;position=1B&amp;page=3&amp;type=full

http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=56&amp;playerid2=5928&amp;playerid3=&amp;position=1B&amp;page=6&amp;type=full

I&#039;ve posted ISO just to show that at an early age, Barton already displays a higher ISO than most seasons until Grace turned 33... That would be 10 years from now for Barton, plenty of time to build off his early performance.

Finally, I added in Youk&#039;s wOBA as a comp with Grace and Barton... He has now put up a wOBA for two seasons higher than any of Grace&#039;s seasons. He may not repeat it, and he may decline faster than Grace - but the point is that for Barton, the ceiling is higher than Grace, IMHO.

http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=56&amp;playerid2=5928&amp;playerid3=1935&amp;position=1B&amp;page=8&amp;type=full

If Barton can start on that curve sooner than Youks, I think we&#039;ll be looking a player who&#039;s offense is far more valuable than Grace.

As for low end projections like Ishikawa: I don&#039;t have enough to make this bet worth it for me... but I&#039;d bet everything on Barton&#039;s offense outperforming Ishikawa by a tremendously large margin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with Grace as a high-end comp. I know it was &#8220;lazy&#8221; but I&#8217;ll take the bait anyway :-)</p>
<p>Mark Grace, as I see it, is a fan favorite &#8211; and that often over-values his (actually) very valuable production. I love Mark Grace for what he provided: he was a fantastic hitter in many ways. If Barton becomes Grace, I&#8217;d be very happy in terms of production&#8230; </p>
<p>Since we cannot expect a career as long as Grace&#8217;s I&#8217;ll concede that it will be difficult to match Grace&#8217;s career-long productivity&#8230; So, if you&#8217;re saying that Grace is a ceiling for overall career value, I&#8217;ll give you that (and you can stop reading!)</p>
<p>Having said that, Grace cannot be a high-end comp for offense at this stage in Barton&#8217;s career. Barton&#8217;s ml bb% is over 15% as compared to Grace who was around 10%. That is dramatic. And Barton has done most of that when he was young for his leagues&#8230; </p>
<p>And if you just want to look at ML performance, despite Barton&#8217;s age and SSS, compare them right here on Fangraphs:</p>
<p>First BB%&#8230; then ISO. BB% is self-explanatory, and somewhat shocking &#8211; couple it to OBP and I think you&#8217;ll see Barton has a different skillset than Grace, even at this early stage of his career. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=56&amp;playerid2=5928&amp;playerid3=&amp;position=1B&amp;page=3&amp;type=full" rel="nofollow">http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=56&amp;playerid2=5928&amp;playerid3=&amp;position=1B&amp;page=3&amp;type=full</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=56&amp;playerid2=5928&amp;playerid3=&amp;position=1B&amp;page=6&amp;type=full" rel="nofollow">http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=56&amp;playerid2=5928&amp;playerid3=&amp;position=1B&amp;page=6&amp;type=full</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve posted ISO just to show that at an early age, Barton already displays a higher ISO than most seasons until Grace turned 33&#8230; That would be 10 years from now for Barton, plenty of time to build off his early performance.</p>
<p>Finally, I added in Youk&#8217;s wOBA as a comp with Grace and Barton&#8230; He has now put up a wOBA for two seasons higher than any of Grace&#8217;s seasons. He may not repeat it, and he may decline faster than Grace &#8211; but the point is that for Barton, the ceiling is higher than Grace, IMHO.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=56&amp;playerid2=5928&amp;playerid3=1935&amp;position=1B&amp;page=8&amp;type=full" rel="nofollow">http://www.fangraphs.com/comparison.aspx?playerid=56&amp;playerid2=5928&amp;playerid3=1935&amp;position=1B&amp;page=8&amp;type=full</a></p>
<p>If Barton can start on that curve sooner than Youks, I think we&#8217;ll be looking a player who&#8217;s offense is far more valuable than Grace.</p>
<p>As for low end projections like Ishikawa: I don&#8217;t have enough to make this bet worth it for me&#8230; but I&#8217;d bet everything on Barton&#8217;s offense outperforming Ishikawa by a tremendously large margin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/#comment-6295</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=5070#comment-6295</guid>
		<description>I believe Barton&#039;s last 3 months of AAA this year yielded a line something like .310/.440/.570... at age 23, of course.

So I have to agree strongly with Divakar that we really don&#039;t know Barton&#039;s power ceiling yet--though, if I had to pick a best-guess MLB hitting comp, it&#039;d be Bobby Abreu (i.e. .300/.400/.500 guy in his prime).

Excellent writeup, DG!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Barton&#8217;s last 3 months of AAA this year yielded a line something like .310/.440/.570&#8230; at age 23, of course.</p>
<p>So I have to agree strongly with Divakar that we really don&#8217;t know Barton&#8217;s power ceiling yet&#8211;though, if I had to pick a best-guess MLB hitting comp, it&#8217;d be Bobby Abreu (i.e. .300/.400/.500 guy in his prime).</p>
<p>Excellent writeup, DG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/#comment-6290</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 04:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=5070#comment-6290</guid>
		<description>Forgot to add another fun fact about Grace.

24th round pick, in the majors 3 years later and just kept hitting (albeit without mountain-smashing power).

Nice when a 24th round pick can hold down first base for a decade and a half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to add another fun fact about Grace.</p>
<p>24th round pick, in the majors 3 years later and just kept hitting (albeit without mountain-smashing power).</p>
<p>Nice when a 24th round pick can hold down first base for a decade and a half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/#comment-6289</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 04:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=5070#comment-6289</guid>
		<description>I never realized what amazing bat control Grace had (didn&#039;t watch cubbies much).  Almost twice as many strikeouts as walks in his career.

I think Barton is likely to walk more often and strikeout more often.
But its a good comp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never realized what amazing bat control Grace had (didn&#8217;t watch cubbies much).  Almost twice as many strikeouts as walks in his career.</p>
<p>I think Barton is likely to walk more often and strikeout more often.<br />
But its a good comp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/daric-bartons-future/#comment-6287</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=5070#comment-6287</guid>
		<description>Barton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
