<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hanley the Man(ly)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/hanley-the-manly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/hanley-the-manly/</link>
	<description>Daily fantasy baseball analysis and strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/hanley-the-manly/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=474#comment-92</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good question, Mike. I don&#039;t think I&#039;d take Arod or Wright first overall - although 3B is relatively weak, I think there are some decent players to be had later in the draft, and I don&#039;t mind settling for a guy like Edwin Encarnacion or Kevin Kouzmanoff or Adrian Beltre (especially if he&#039;s traded) much later. I think Hanley is going to put up better raw numbers than Arod/Wright, and I think SS is less deep (although more top-heavy). 

That&#039;s just off of the top of my head, though, and I reserve the right to change my mind :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good question, Mike. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d take Arod or Wright first overall &#8211; although 3B is relatively weak, I think there are some decent players to be had later in the draft, and I don&#8217;t mind settling for a guy like Edwin Encarnacion or Kevin Kouzmanoff or Adrian Beltre (especially if he&#8217;s traded) much later. I think Hanley is going to put up better raw numbers than Arod/Wright, and I think SS is less deep (although more top-heavy). </p>
<p>That&#8217;s just off of the top of my head, though, and I reserve the right to change my mind :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ketchen</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/hanley-the-manly/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Ketchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=474#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Who do you take first? Arod? Wright? 3b is very shallow and will be even worse this year with Miggy and Braun losing eligibility. However I think getting a five tool monster from SS is first overall without question. It is also the second shallowest poisiton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who do you take first? Arod? Wright? 3b is very shallow and will be even worse this year with Miggy and Braun losing eligibility. However I think getting a five tool monster from SS is first overall without question. It is also the second shallowest poisiton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bendix</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/hanley-the-manly/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bendix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=474#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I do remember hearing comments about Hanley&#039;s decreasing stolen base attempts being a decision by management. We&#039;ll see if that holds true in 2009.

As for my saying &quot;most&quot; instead of &quot;all,&quot; there&#039;s no good reason why Hanley shouldn&#039;t be a first round pick in ALL leagues. My writing &quot;most&quot; was simply out of habit of hedging my bets - Hanley should be a first round pick in every league, unless something dramatic changes during this offseason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do remember hearing comments about Hanley&#8217;s decreasing stolen base attempts being a decision by management. We&#8217;ll see if that holds true in 2009.</p>
<p>As for my saying &#8220;most&#8221; instead of &#8220;all,&#8221; there&#8217;s no good reason why Hanley shouldn&#8217;t be a first round pick in ALL leagues. My writing &#8220;most&#8221; was simply out of habit of hedging my bets &#8211; Hanley should be a first round pick in every league, unless something dramatic changes during this offseason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/hanley-the-manly/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=474#comment-87</guid>
		<description>I read an article a while back saying that the florida management wanted to reduce the number of bases Hanley stole so his body would hold up over the course of a season to hit for more power.  That could be why his stolen bases went down this year.  Good article, and i sure hope he can hit 40-40, but I was curious about one thing:  You say that he should be a first round choice in &quot;most&quot; leagues.  Unless I am in a 2 team league, why isn&#039;t it all leagues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article a while back saying that the florida management wanted to reduce the number of bases Hanley stole so his body would hold up over the course of a season to hit for more power.  That could be why his stolen bases went down this year.  Good article, and i sure hope he can hit 40-40, but I was curious about one thing:  You say that he should be a first round choice in &#8220;most&#8221; leagues.  Unless I am in a 2 team league, why isn&#8217;t it all leagues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

