Johan Santana: Good, but overrated
Another season, another sub-3.00 ERA for Johan Santana. Business as usual, right? Wrong. Fantasy players should be very wary of Johan in 2009.
Johan’s 2.53 ERA in 2008 was the lowest of his illustrious career. However, his 1.15 WHIP was his highest since 2002, and although he struck out 206 batters, his strikeout rate was the lowest it had been since 2001. Furthermore, his walk rate was the highest it had been since 2003. So how the heck did Johan post the best ERA of his career?
It certainly wasn’t his BABIP. In fact, Johan’s .287 BABIP from 2008 was exactly in line with his career BABIP of .286. However, he managed to strand over 82% of the runners who reached base. In fact, Johan’s 82.6% LOB% was the highest LOB% of any starting pitcher in baseball. Johan has always had a high LOB% – remember, good pitchers tend to leave a lot of runners on base simply because they have a high chance of retiring every batter they face – however, his LOB% in 2008 was the highest of his career. Over the last three years, his LOB% has been 76.3%, 77.7% and 78.3%, respectively.
What’s perhaps more worrisome is that Johan’s fundamental statistics appear to be declining across the board. Let’s start with his velocity. Back in 2005, Johan’s fastball averaged 92.4 MPH; in 2006 he managed 93.1 MPH. However, last year his fastball velocity fell to 91.7 MPH, and this year it fell to 91.2 MPH. Additionally – perhaps as compensation? – his changeup velocity fell to 80.0 MPH, from 81.9 MPH last year and 81.8 MPH in 2006.
Of course, as guys like Trevor Hoffman can attest to, a pitcher’s fastball and changeup velocities themselves are far less important than the difference between his fastball and his changeup. Therefore, the simple dip in velocity isn’t particularly concerning in and of itself. However, Santana’s control, as well as his ability to induce swings-and-misses, both appear to be in decline as well.
Johan has thrown a higher percentage of balls every year for four consecutive years, starting in 2005. That year, 30.0% of his pitches were out of the strike zone, in 2006 he missed with 31.5% of his pitches, in 2007 32.1% of his pitches were balls, this year that number was 33.2%. Of even more concern is his drop in swinging strikes. From 2004 through 2007, Santana induced swings and misses on between 13.2% and 14.9% of his pitches. However, in 2008, batters swung and missed at only 11.3% of his pitches. 11.3% is still a very good number, but it is a distinct drop from his previous levels.
Taken individually, each of these factors is not terribly concerning, and could suggest a one-year fluke rather than diminished skills. However, taken as a set, these signs are concerning. Don’t get me wrong: Johan is still a very good pitcher; however, his 2.53 ERA in 2008 didn’t reflect his actual pitching.
In 2008, Johan’s FIP was 3.51. His regressed tRA, or tRA*, was 4.16, which is the equivalent of a 3.76 ERA. Johan’s true ERA level in 2008 was probably somewhere between these numbers, and unless he shows that the things I’ve listed above were one-year flukes, Johan could see his ERA rise a full run – or more – in 2009. That would still make him a good pitcher, especially considering he still should strike out approximately eight batters per nine innings, but it also means that Johan is almost certainly going to be drastically overvalued on draft day. Let someone else pay top dollar for a guy who’s no longer worth the money.
Print This Post

Great piece, I just wrote something similar on my blog. I still think he is a top five to ten starter but I think CC and Lincecum are in fron for sure and a bunch more could make a case (Halladay, Webb, Peavy, Beckett)
Interesting article….call me crazy but I would shy away from CC on draft day too. The mileage on his arm, especially the 500 innings pitched between the past two seasons, scares me.
CC is an interesting case. I too am very wary of the mileage that has been put on CC’s arm, but he’s an unusual person. Although he’s so large, he’s also extremely athletic, and it wouldn’t surprise me if was rather unique, perhaps not unlike Roger Clemens (only without the PEDs).
I don’t think CC is likely to be able to withstand this workload forever and therefore would be a risky bet to sign to a 6-year deal, but I also don’t think his risk of flaming out next year is that high.
I understand the concerns but, his GB rate increased and his IFFB rate increased as well. This could be indicative of weak contact and shows that Johan may be pitching to contact in more situations. FIP is not kind to pitching to contact. With a good defense behind him( and pitching in a pitcher’s park), and the great stuff that he has, he may not get as flashy ratios as before but, he is still a great pitcher and not overrated.
“However, Santana’s control, as well as his ability to induce swings-and-misses, both appear to be in decline as well.”
Anyone happen to know who leads the majors in swinging strikes?
mike(first comment of this article) wrote
“I still think he is a top five to ten starter but I think CC and Lincecum are in fron for sure and a bunch more could make a case”
CC better than santana for sure. hahahahahahaha. i needed a good laugh.
Dear Peter,
Just ran into this article. Interesting and fact-based one but you, like many analysts in the US, clearly overlooked a key factor with this guy that many of you just dont get: his heart and pride.
Here in Venezuela, most baseball fans knew he was going to come back on a mission from a “transition” year in which he had to adjust to a new league, new park, new teammates, and NYC–just like he is doing right now. I did pick in among the top in my league, and am having a ball (unlike those who heard your one-dimensional advice)
..and dont even get me started on K-Rod, whom by the same logic, maybe you (as well as many others I hate to admit) may have discounted as well after his record-setting-yet-statistically-lackluster season last year. Just look at what he is doing to date…
By the way, how is CC doing?
All in good fun…;-)