Comments on: Fantasy Links — 9/3/2009 http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/links-932009/ Daily fantasy baseball analysis and strategy Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:23:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Matt B. http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/links-932009/#comment-5053 Matt B. Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:23:28 +0000 http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=4671#comment-5053 You can't. You can’t.

]]> By: Brian http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/links-932009/#comment-5038 Brian Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:52:56 +0000 http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=4671#comment-5038 Kemp has been in the discussion both years, so how can you go wrong with him? Kemp has been in the discussion both years, so how can you go wrong with him?

]]> By: Neil http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/links-932009/#comment-4995 Neil Sat, 05 Sep 2009 19:14:58 +0000 http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=4671#comment-4995 What's amusing is the prior to the 2009 drafts, the debate was Kemp versus BJ UPTON. Bj Upton fans were touting his potential to go 20-40 while Kemp fans were saying that Matt Kemp was already putting up the numbers you want to get out of BJ Upton. What’s amusing is the prior to the 2009 drafts, the debate was Kemp versus BJ UPTON. Bj Upton fans were touting his potential to go 20-40 while Kemp fans were saying that Matt Kemp was already putting up the numbers you want to get out of BJ Upton.

]]> By: Lucky Strikes http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/links-932009/#comment-4983 Lucky Strikes Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:46:58 +0000 http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=4671#comment-4983 The Upton vs. Kemp debate is a great one, especially considering both have a BABIP .370 or above (Upton @ .376). Could each of these guys seem a fall next year in BA? Kemp might be the better of the two over the next year or so, but you have to believe Upton is in rare territory and is due to be a super-super star very soon at just 22 years old right now. He's injured, but where does Jay Bruce enter this discussion? The Upton vs. Kemp debate is a great one, especially considering both have a BABIP .370 or above (Upton @ .376). Could each of these guys seem a fall next year in BA? Kemp might be the better of the two over the next year or so, but you have to believe Upton is in rare territory and is due to be a super-super star very soon at just 22 years old right now. He’s injured, but where does Jay Bruce enter this discussion?

]]> By: Matt B. http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/links-932009/#comment-4982 Matt B. Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:57:51 +0000 http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=4671#comment-4982 Upton or Kemp?? Kemp will be 26 next year, and he has impressive numbers, but I have to roll with Upton. He (Upton) shouldn't be putting up the numbers he is already at this age. Isnt he #2 in OF OPS, behind only Dunn (if you consider him OF). Upton or Kemp?? Kemp will be 26 next year, and he has impressive numbers, but I have to roll with Upton. He (Upton) shouldn’t be putting up the numbers he is already at this age. Isnt he #2 in OF OPS, behind only Dunn (if you consider him OF).

]]> By: Matt B. http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/links-932009/#comment-4979 Matt B. Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:50:27 +0000 http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=4671#comment-4979 Confirmed. Confirmed.

]]> By: BalugaWhale http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/links-932009/#comment-4978 BalugaWhale Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:17:51 +0000 http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=4671#comment-4978 Just trying to help out here... why do these articles of yours get listed in the Rotographs box on the main page, but when you click through it says 'article not available'? Maybe it's just me, but this only happens with the Daily Links articles and its happened several times. Can anyone else confirm? Just trying to help out here… why do these articles of yours get listed in the Rotographs box on the main page, but when you click through it says ‘article not available’?

Maybe it’s just me, but this only happens with the Daily Links articles and its happened several times. Can anyone else confirm?

]]>