Rangeless Rangers Compound Pitching Problems
Any way that you want to slice and dice the numbers, the Rangers’ starting pitching staff was a Texas-sized embarrassment in 2008. The club bashed its way to a major league-best .278 Equivalent Average, scoring a whopping 902 runs along the way. Unfortunately, as good as the offense was, the team’s run prevention was poor enough to nullify all of those crooked numbers posted by Hamilton, Kinsler et al.
Name a Texas pitcher that took the hill, and odds are that his ERA resembled something that you’d see on the side of a Boeing jet. As a team, the Rangers’ starters authored an abhorrent 5.51 ERA, tying the Baltimore Orioles for the highest mark in the bigs (if Texas and Baltimore switched staffs, would anyone notice?) Even using WPA/LI to adjust for the hitter-happy tendencies of Arlington, the Rangers ranked just 25th in the bigs. In a clear sign of the Apocalypse, Sidney Ponson (released in June) “led” the staff in WPA/LI at 0.23. When Sir Sidney leads your staff in anything but surliness, you have a problem.
So, the vast majority of Texas’ starters were crappy, regardless of dimensions of their home ballpark. That’s not breaking news. However, the Rangers’ fielders did those starters no favors in 2008. While Texas featured some heavy hitters, several prominent players were lethargic with the leather.
David Appelman recently added yet another great feature to this site: Ultimate Zone Rating. Using a fielding model developed by Mitchel Lichtman, UZR allows us to calculate how many runs above or below average a fielder is per 150 games played (for further details and discussion, look here). Perusing the Texas team page, it becomes apparent that while the Rangers’ offense is strong up the middle, some of those runs are punted back on defense (and, in Young’s case, on offense as well):
CF Hamilton: -12.6 UZR/150
2B Kinsler: -4.4 UZR/150
SS Young: -3.7 UZR/150
Ramon Vazquez‘s work at third base was enough to make Brooks Robinson weep (-19.2 UZR/150), but the free agent is unlikely to return to Texas. UZR isn’t the only fielding system that disapproves of this troika either, as John Dewan’s Plus/Minus system had Kinsler (-15 plays) Hamilton (-13) and Young (-7) all in the red as well. That combined -35 showing translates to about 28 runs below average. Another slugger, Chris Davis, will likely see action at the hot corner next season. It’s too small of a sample to mean much, but the 6-4, 235 pounder was -3 plays in 404 innings at first base, -9 in 276 innings at third and comes with spotty defensive scouting reports.
You might be asking yourself, why does this matter? Texas’ starters are hazardous to being with, so who cares if the defense makes things worse? While it’s true that many of the club’s starters have been downright repugnant over the past few seasons, the Rangers do have a considerable wave of young arms emerging. Eric Hurley, Tommy Hunter and Matt Harrison have already made their debuts. Higher-tier hurlers like Derek Holland and Neftali Feliz reached AA in ’08, and are blazing a trail to the majors that could place them in Arlington sometime during the 2009 season.
While these prospects should still be kept on the radar screen, it is important to keep in mind the context in which they will be placed: pitching in a bandbox (Rangers Ballpark in Arlington increased run production by seven percent from 2006-2008) in front of iron-gloved defenders.

18
Hey, wait a minute. Didn’t Young win the gold glove?
Who is better between Hurley, Hunter and Harrison (The 3-H Club!)?
Who has the best shot at starting in Texas this year and which one has the best career ahead of him. Don’t know much about Texas SP prospects.
Their -34 team RngR would be a 0.22 ERA difference for the staff as a whole… am I doing that right? So they’re still bad, but wouldn’t look quite as bad with league average defense behind them.
Add Holland, and you have 4-H. That’s a good handle for a Texas ballclub.
Don,
The Rangers were about -36 in terms of UZR. Supposing the Texas pitching staff (starters and relievers) were put behind average defenders, they theoretically would have given up 36 fewer runs. They surrendered 967 R for a RA of 6.04 (yeesh). If we subtract those 36 runs, the Texas RA does “improve” to 5.8l.
We’re definitely speaking in relative terms here, but Texas did have the biggest split between FIP and ERA, with a FIP 0.53 runs lower than the club’s ERA. Not surprisingly, the 5 teams with the biggest FIP/ERA split (lower FIP than ERA) featured plenty of lackluster defense:
Rangers, -35.8 UZR
Rockies, -70.9 UZR
Yankees, -39.4 UZR
Royals, 19.2 UZR
Pirates, -17.8 UZR
Only the Royals turned in a decent season with the leather.
Nolan Ryan (hehe),
If I had to pick one of those three in a NEUTRAL environment, I think I’d go with Hurley. Unfortunately, he’s a flyball-oriented pitcher, and that doesn’t tend to go over so well in Arlington.
Harrison strikes me as a back-of-the-rotation guy. He has pretty good control and keeps the ball on the ground, but he probably won’t miss many bats.
You could say many of those same things about Hunter (though he’s a righty and could probably eat Harrison), who uses his sinker to pound the strike zone and kill some worms.
This probably wouldnt be too difficult to fix.
Move Hamilton to right and Young to 3rd and you go from 2 negative defenders to potentially 2 + defenders.
Sign a couple defense first guys (a la Izturis to Bal). Sacrificing runs wouldnt be he worst thing b/c they already have a ton and they are playing for 2010/2011 anyway.
As usual, Im sure this is easier said then done.