<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Francisco&#8217;s Giant Pitching Prospects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/san-franciscos-giant-pitching-prospects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/san-franciscos-giant-pitching-prospects/</link>
	<description>Daily fantasy baseball analysis and strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:15:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJP</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/san-franciscos-giant-pitching-prospects/#comment-2580</link>
		<dc:creator>AJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 03:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3081#comment-2580</guid>
		<description>The Giants really have a good thing going for them right now because of their pitching depth. Lincecum &amp; Cain alone are enough to make them a top of the line rotation but top that with the potential of Bumgarner and Alderson and we could have the next best staff in baseball for years to come.It reminds me of the Braves rotation of Maddux, Smoltz, and Glavine, chances are that it probably won&#039;t be that good but it will be good. If they could just get some bats in their lineup, watch out. They won&#039;t even need a top of the line offense to win, a mediocre offense and an awsome pitching staff will do wonders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Giants really have a good thing going for them right now because of their pitching depth. Lincecum &amp; Cain alone are enough to make them a top of the line rotation but top that with the potential of Bumgarner and Alderson and we could have the next best staff in baseball for years to come.It reminds me of the Braves rotation of Maddux, Smoltz, and Glavine, chances are that it probably won&#8217;t be that good but it will be good. If they could just get some bats in their lineup, watch out. They won&#8217;t even need a top of the line offense to win, a mediocre offense and an awsome pitching staff will do wonders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Hulet</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/san-franciscos-giant-pitching-prospects/#comment-2536</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Hulet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3081#comment-2536</guid>
		<description>LOL. He probably IS that good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. He probably IS that good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin S.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/san-franciscos-giant-pitching-prospects/#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 14:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3081#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>Bumgarner is so good, he gets the definite article affixed to his name? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bumgarner is so good, he gets the definite article affixed to his name? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

