<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 10 Trade Possibilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/</link>
	<description>Daily fantasy baseball analysis and strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:45:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R M</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/#comment-6300</link>
		<dc:creator>R M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3673#comment-6300</guid>
		<description>Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Joura</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/#comment-3619</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Joura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3673#comment-3619</guid>
		<description>Alex -

Chris Dutton and Peter Bendix developed a new model for BABIP that you might find interesting.  You can read about it here:

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/batters-and-babip/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex -</p>
<p>Chris Dutton and Peter Bendix developed a new model for BABIP that you might find interesting.  You can read about it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/batters-and-babip/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/batters-and-babip/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/#comment-3617</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3673#comment-3617</guid>
		<description>Brian,

You mention Stewart&#039;s 244 BABIP (232 now, actually) and ridiculously low Coors Field Avg as reasons why we&#039;ll see marked improvement over the second half.   

One thing I noticed though is his LD %.  It&#039;s 12.5% this year vs. 25% last year - TWICE as high.  It&#039;s a factor in his lower BABIP for sure, as a higher LD rate correlates with a more sustainably higher BABIP.   

His FB rate - which induces a lower BABIP - is 50%, really high even for power hitters.

I mention all this because with no AVG numbers available for Hit Ball Rates on players&#039; stat pages, it&#039;s tough to see exactly where Stewart falls as far as those rates go.

MORE importantly, it would be very helpful if you guys developed a metric called &quot;expected BABIP&quot;... that is, considering a player&#039;s Hit Ball Rates, what would we expect his BABIP to be?  A guy like Robbie Cano, cause of his LD rate could be expected to have a higher and more sustainable BABIP than 09 Stewart, where as Stewart could be expected to have a lower BABIP (though not as low as it is now).

The standard # for judging BABIP against is 300.  But we consistently see the best hitters post BABIPS much higher than that.  So what are the appropriate baseline BABIPS for players with different types of Hit Ball Rates.

Perhaps dividing Hit Ball Rates into categories like these could help, placing players into the categories in which they most closely belong and then determining the expected BABIP for hit ball rates of those configurations:  High LD, MED GB, LOW FB.  Med LD, High GB, Low FB, etc etc etc...

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>You mention Stewart&#8217;s 244 BABIP (232 now, actually) and ridiculously low Coors Field Avg as reasons why we&#8217;ll see marked improvement over the second half.   </p>
<p>One thing I noticed though is his LD %.  It&#8217;s 12.5% this year vs. 25% last year &#8211; TWICE as high.  It&#8217;s a factor in his lower BABIP for sure, as a higher LD rate correlates with a more sustainably higher BABIP.   </p>
<p>His FB rate &#8211; which induces a lower BABIP &#8211; is 50%, really high even for power hitters.</p>
<p>I mention all this because with no AVG numbers available for Hit Ball Rates on players&#8217; stat pages, it&#8217;s tough to see exactly where Stewart falls as far as those rates go.</p>
<p>MORE importantly, it would be very helpful if you guys developed a metric called &#8220;expected BABIP&#8221;&#8230; that is, considering a player&#8217;s Hit Ball Rates, what would we expect his BABIP to be?  A guy like Robbie Cano, cause of his LD rate could be expected to have a higher and more sustainable BABIP than 09 Stewart, where as Stewart could be expected to have a lower BABIP (though not as low as it is now).</p>
<p>The standard # for judging BABIP against is 300.  But we consistently see the best hitters post BABIPS much higher than that.  So what are the appropriate baseline BABIPS for players with different types of Hit Ball Rates.</p>
<p>Perhaps dividing Hit Ball Rates into categories like these could help, placing players into the categories in which they most closely belong and then determining the expected BABIP for hit ball rates of those configurations:  High LD, MED GB, LOW FB.  Med LD, High GB, Low FB, etc etc etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Galt</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/#comment-3257</link>
		<dc:creator>John Galt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3673#comment-3257</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t waste time evaluating hitters against pitchers or v.v. Evaluate your league and where you are in the standings.

It&#039;s impossible to say what SS would have similar value as Bedard TO YOU without knowing who&#039;s on your team, where you rank in each category, and where your competition is in each category. If your rotation is Santana, Lincecum, Haren, and Sabathia, then Bedard will have less value TO YOU than he would to someone with a lousy rotation. My guess is your rotation&#039;s not nearly that good.

Unless Hits and Runs are tightly bunched in your league and you can make up a lot of ground there, a guy like Theriot&#039;s not gonna be the answer. Look for the SS&#039;s who will gain you more offensive points than you&#039;d lose on the pitching side without Bedard. Hopefully, you can find one on a contending team with a lousy rotation that could make up ground if it had Bedard - that owner will value Bedard very highly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t waste time evaluating hitters against pitchers or v.v. Evaluate your league and where you are in the standings.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s impossible to say what SS would have similar value as Bedard TO YOU without knowing who&#8217;s on your team, where you rank in each category, and where your competition is in each category. If your rotation is Santana, Lincecum, Haren, and Sabathia, then Bedard will have less value TO YOU than he would to someone with a lousy rotation. My guess is your rotation&#8217;s not nearly that good.</p>
<p>Unless Hits and Runs are tightly bunched in your league and you can make up a lot of ground there, a guy like Theriot&#8217;s not gonna be the answer. Look for the SS&#8217;s who will gain you more offensive points than you&#8217;d lose on the pitching side without Bedard. Hopefully, you can find one on a contending team with a lousy rotation that could make up ground if it had Bedard &#8211; that owner will value Bedard very highly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/#comment-3233</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3673#comment-3233</guid>
		<description>I have an offer of Theriot for Bedard as I&#039;ve been advertising that Bedard is available in exchange for SS help.  I&#039;m getting killed at SS in a deep league with Reyes out, there&#039;s no one on the WW worth thinking about, and not too many teams have depth at SS since it is a 14 team league that includes MI position.  Who do you see at that position as having similar value to Bedard.  I always have a difficult time valuing hitters against pitchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an offer of Theriot for Bedard as I&#8217;ve been advertising that Bedard is available in exchange for SS help.  I&#8217;m getting killed at SS in a deep league with Reyes out, there&#8217;s no one on the WW worth thinking about, and not too many teams have depth at SS since it is a 14 team league that includes MI position.  Who do you see at that position as having similar value to Bedard.  I always have a difficult time valuing hitters against pitchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R M</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/#comment-3231</link>
		<dc:creator>R M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3673#comment-3231</guid>
		<description>JJ Hardy is a great buy low candidate in my mind right now.  He is very streaky, and usually he finds away to even out long slumps like this by going on big hot streaks.  Maybe he has one in store for the second half.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ Hardy is a great buy low candidate in my mind right now.  He is very streaky, and usually he finds away to even out long slumps like this by going on big hot streaks.  Maybe he has one in store for the second half&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/#comment-3225</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3673#comment-3225</guid>
		<description>Say no and keep Haren.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say no and keep Haren.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike N.</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/#comment-3217</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3673#comment-3217</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say Stephen Drew is the best buy-low SS target out there right now.  You can probably flip Young for Drew and get a nice upgrade elsewhere in the deal.  You could also package Young with someone for J-Roll or sub Drew out for Alexei Ramirez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say Stephen Drew is the best buy-low SS target out there right now.  You can probably flip Young for Drew and get a nice upgrade elsewhere in the deal.  You could also package Young with someone for J-Roll or sub Drew out for Alexei Ramirez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eno Sarris</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/#comment-3216</link>
		<dc:creator>Eno Sarris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3673#comment-3216</guid>
		<description>Actually, Miller, that&#039;s a tough one. Haren&#039;s got a crazy first/second half split for his career, and Bedard may end up in a favorable situation for wins at least. Bastardo is looking good, too. I&#039;d still say no, as Brian is right about the strand rate, and there are few parks as pitching-favorable as Seattle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Miller, that&#8217;s a tough one. Haren&#8217;s got a crazy first/second half split for his career, and Bedard may end up in a favorable situation for wins at least. Bastardo is looking good, too. I&#8217;d still say no, as Brian is right about the strand rate, and there are few parks as pitching-favorable as Seattle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/index.php/week-10-trade-possibilities/#comment-3215</link>
		<dc:creator>Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/?p=3673#comment-3215</guid>
		<description>I was proposed Bedard and Antonio Bastardo for Dan Haren? I Have Haren. What do I do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was proposed Bedard and Antonio Bastardo for Dan Haren? I Have Haren. What do I do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

