Johnny Cueto’s Continued Success
If Cincinnati’s Johnny Cueto had managed to pitch just six more innings in a 2011 that started late because of right shoulder inflammation and ended early because of a strained lat, he’d have finished second only to NL Cy Young Award winner Clayton Kershaw with a 2.31 ERA. (Assuming that in those six innings, he pitched to a consistent level of production as he had before, of course.)
Ending up behind only Kershaw and just ahead of Roy Halladay is pretty impressive company, yet I can’t say I was completely buying into Cueto simply based on that. His sparkling 2.31 ERA was hardly backed up by a 3.45 FIP and a 3.90 xFIP; along with declining velocity and strikeout rates, it seemed that Cueto’s nice season was more a mirage of a career-low .249 BABIP than anything else. I believe that prior to the season on another site, I named him my “most overrated” pitcher headed into 2012, figuring that the ERA would likely to return back to his previously established rates.
Three months into the season, Cueto is outdoing himself with a 2.21 ERA despite having his BABIP indeed return to almost exactly his career average, and clearly I couldn’t have been more wrong about him. How is he doing it?
Right off the bat, there’s one obvious improvement in Cueto’s game, and that’s that he’s issuing fewer free passes than at any time in his career; at 1.86 per game, he’s walking nearly a full man per nine fewer than he had been in 2010 & 2011. That makes him one of the ten stingiest in the National League as far as allowing walks, and the calculus there is simple: fewer men on base equals fewer chances to score.
Of the runners he does allow to reach base, few are scoring in huge bunches because Cueto has managed to become one of the few pitchers to avoid the home run curse that often comes with pitching in Cincinnati’s offense-friendly park. His 0.44 HR/9 makes him the only Reds starter to allow fewer than one homer per nine innings, and overall he’s the second-best on the staff in that respect. That also makes for the sixth-lowest rate in baseball, and most of the guys ahead of him – Gio Gonzalez, Zack Greinke, Josh Johnson, even the surprising Wade Miley – have been among the most successful starters in the game in 2012. (Also, there’s Kevin Millwood. I have no idea how to explain that, other than in part, “Seattle”. The universe is a strange place sometimes.)
Cueto’s control has manifested itself in other ways, as he’s been able to improve his previously sub-par first pitch strike percentage to about league-average, while also increasing his strikeout rate over last year – despite his swinging-strike percentage actually decreasing. While his FIP once again isn’t quite as great as his ERA, these small changes in his peripherals have brought that down to a 3.03 level, which is still very good and hardly something to complain about. As he works through his age-26 season, Cueto’s blend of excellent command and solid ability to avoid the big hit is more than paying off, and I have no issue with admitting that my expectations for him were selling him far too short.
Still, part of me sees him as a sell-high candidate, because traditionally he’s had trouble sustaining his quality first half performance (.696 OPS against, 3.26 ERA) into the second half (.760 OPS, 4.29 ERA). With that track record, a history of arm soreness, and Dusty Baker as his manager, it’s fair to wonder if he’s set up to continue to succeed as June turns into July, August, & September. Considering he’s on the verge of double-digit wins and will probably be an All-Star, it shouldn’t be difficult to find value for him. Of course, only if you can get good value; hanging onto a guy with a good team behind him and one of the lowest ERAs in baseball is hardly a terrible outcome.
imo hes an ace on 75% of major league teams. his delivery is deceptive and is a big part of his success. guy just knows how to pitch
The “Dusty Baker causes arm injuries” thing is a myth I see mentioned on this site over and over. He was handling Kerry Wood and Mark Prior for crying out loud. For one thing, had he resorted to his backup options, the Cubs probably wouldn’t have gotten into the playoffs. The other thing is that with mechanics like theirs, of course Wood and Prior needed surgery.
I’m no fan of Dusty but this is such a myth. It’s gone on so long it’s considered fact without even looking. I watch most Reds games and he doesn’t leave his starters out there any longer than anyone else. I don’t have numbers but this is an issue that should be revisited by someone at Fangraphs.
Off the top of my head, I’d include Aaron Harang in there as well. He was never really the same after Dusty made him throw four innings of relief in between starts: http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/12/aaron-harang-says-struggles-stemmed-from-2008-relief-appearance/
I don’t know too much about Wood’s mechanics but it’s a misconception that Prior’s mechanics caused the derailment of his career. The dude suffered from so many freak accidents that had nothing to do with pitching.
Even apart from the Dusty Baker ruins arms idea, he routinely mismanages the starter and bullpen within a game. He could cost a pitcher some wins and ERA a la Arroyo the other night.
Yeah guys, Dusty Baker had nothing to do with Mark Prior’s arm going south. Including the playoffs the guy only averaged 121 pitches over his final 15 starts of the season. Yeah, that says averaged. But you guys are probably right, that probably had nothing to do with it.
Oh wait, 121 pitches per game over 15 games in a row isn’t good?
Compare that to John Farrell’s season this year.
Who’s is worse?
Nice article, Mike. I think some additional reasons for Cueto’s continued success at limiting runs are his SB% against (10% – has only allowed 1 SB since the beginning of 2011) and his high GB% (which helps with pitching out of jams and avoiding the HR ball)
this is true.
his pick off move is imply amazing, as evidenced by the embarrassment suffered by both Melky and Posey last night
Maybe Dusty has changed his philosophy on pitching? Also, without Dusty’s handling of the Staff the Cubs would have never made the playoffs that year. Has anyone asked Prior and Wood if they blame Dusty? That would be the most telling arguement against Dusty. I didn’t like Dusty when he first started managing the Reds, but I have warmed up to him as the years have gone on. Does Sparky get blamed for Don Gullett’s arm problems?