Finally, we get to the starting pitchers, my favorite position. If you thought there was room for disagreement among the outfielders, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet. The many disagreements of value among starters and the multitude of later round sleeper options is precisely why my strategy in every single draft/auction I participate in is to pay the least for my staff or wait many a round to draft my first starter. For this last episode of Pod’s Picks, I will only look at those I ranked in the top 84 as bullish picks, while the bearish group will include those in the consensus top 84. I went with 84 assuming about seven starters per team in a 12-team mixed league would earn positive value.
Note that I will not be publishing a relief pitcher version as it’s just no fun and not very valuable.
My Rank: 66 | Consensus: 111
The Justin Ruggiano of the pitching side, Cashner has found his way onto all of my fantasy teams as well and should continue to do so. While it’s not 100% that he’ll be ready for opening day, he should only miss 2 weeks if he isn’t. Why am I such a huge fan? Very simple. Strikeouts and ground balls. All the projection systems think his control should be acceptable enough (mid-3.0 BB/9), so the only concern remains his health and how many innings he could throw this year. Chase Headley‘s injury hampers his potential run support, but he could be excellent in both ERA and strikeouts, at the very least, while on the mound. My ranking may prove to be conservative as it was based on a mere 130 innings pitched projection.
My Rank: 60 | Consensus: 89
Certainly an innings pitched discrepancy and we still don’t know who has won the fifth spot in the Cardinals rotation. I’m not sure why the team would go with Joe Kelly over Miller as it seems clear the latter is ready to succeed at the big league level. He’s a fly ball pitcher, but in a good ballpark to hold those in the park.
My Rank: 49 | Consensus: 75
A forgotten man after his breakout was cut short by a knee injury that limited him to just 118 innings, I think Hammel’s gains were real. His ground ball rate spiked and fastball velocity jumped, both to career highs. The home park and division aren’t favorable, though the division got a bit easier with the walking wounded in New York. My projection is almost spot on with what the Fans are projection, which does not happen very often.
My Rank: 56 | Consensus: 77
Probably an innings pitched thing as Marcum has battled elbow and shoulder issues and threw just 124 innings last season. When healthy, he’s been solid and I love the move to Citi Field as Miller Park is not kind to fly ball pitchers.
My Rank: 46 | Consensus: 66
Once again, the projected innings total is the difference. Anderson simply can’t stay healthy and has never thrown more than 175.1 innings in a season. He was healthy heading into spring training and the right trapezius injury doesn’t seem like anything. My rank is derived from a projection of 160 innings, which may or may not prove to optimistic. We know, however, that when on the mound he’ll be good.
My Rank: 92 | Consensus: 59
For a guy with a league average batted ball profile, including pop-up rate, I cannot for the life of me understand how he has managed a below average BABIP for two straight seasons. The Giants were about average in UZR/150 last year and just a bit better than average in BABIP allowed. The low HR/FB rate also seems unsustainable, especially since he was actually better in away parks last year than at home. But the biggest mystery is his high LOB%, usually reserved for the best of the best with high strikeout rates. How much longer will the magic continue? I need more than 370 innings of dramatically outperforming his SIERA to believe Vogelsong is in a class with Matt Cain and Jered Weaver. Last, given his low SwStk%, you have to question how long he can maintain an above league average strikeout rate.
My Rank: 89 | Consensus: 64
Here is yet another pitcher who has significantly outperformed his SIERA over the last two seasons. A ground ball pitcher with an above average line drive rate has no business posting below league average BABIP marks. The high LOB% last year was a fluke as well. This is a pitcher with no margin for error given his low strikeout rate and so the risk is too high for a 4.00+ ERA to roster him at his likely cost.
My Rank: 73 | Consensus: 49
Sense a theme here? Parker is another SIERA beater due primarily to his low HR/FB rate. While I do think he will improve his peripherals this season, that won’t be enough to maintain last year’s ERA, or anywhere close. While I’m not nearly as pessimistic as Steamer is (4.31 projected ERA), I think the chances of a 4.00 ERA are quite high.
My Rank: 93 | Consensus: 70
The consensus was skewed by Zach Sanders’ ranking of 36, though I was the most pessimistic of the four rankers. Miley came out of nowhere last year, dispaying sparkling control en route to a 3.33 ERA, but he required a low HR/FB rate to post such a result. Aside from his short stint at Triple-A, Miley’s minor league history is quite uninspiring and makes one question where that pinpoint control came from. His F-Strike% suggests his walk rate is in for a serious jump, perhaps to around 3.0 and he doesn’t appear to have much strikeout rate upside. Though Park above benefits from pitching in a pitcher’s park, Miley’s does not. A 4.00+ ERA is a strong possibility.
Print This Post