Soria Hurt? Potential New Royals Closer
Yesterday afternoon, Royals closer Joakim Soria left the game with a sore right elbow. But this doesn’t sound like any sore elbow as a result of just shaking off some spring training rust and he’ll be fine in a couple of days. This appears more ominous. His performance this spring certainly backs up the fact that he has been pitching injured, as he has now allowed 7 runs and 10 hits in just 3 1/3 innings. Of course, it’s a tiny sample size and typically should be ignored. But when elbow soreness is involved, we have to take that performance more seriously.
Check out Soria’s quotes:
“Oh, yeah, I’m worried,” he admitted. “Since I’ve had my Tommy John surgery (in 2003), I’ve never had anything like that. I don’t feel it’s that bad because before the Tommy John surgery, all of my strength went away. This time, it hasn’t.
“So I don’t feel like it’s that.”
The team said he would be reevaluated within the next couple of days, at which point we should have a more definitive diagnosis. Of course, by then it is likely that every potential replacement has already been scooped up in your fantasy league. So let’s run through them and try to figure out who is the likeliest to take over the job if Soria is out for an extended period of time.
Holland was utterly dominant last season during his first full year in the majors. Though he seemed to enjoy great fortune in all three luck metrics, his SIERA of 2.22 still suggests he was fantastic. That strikeout rate of over 11 per nine innings was backed up by a ridiculous 16.6% SwStk% and he posted an identical K/9 in a small sample in 2010. His control has been an issue in the past, but his F-Strike% was right at the league average, so he may not see that much regression. Assuming he can keep up that strikeout rate, and all the evidence points to this being likely, than he should be more than capable of holding down the closer role. Also, he posted the highest non-Soria gmLI of all the bullpenners last year, so Yost trusted him most, which is important.
He’s baaaack! Since undergoing elbow surgery of his own last year, Broxton has pitched two innings so far, striking out three and walking one. I haven’t found any reports about his velocity, aside from this unhelpful quote from Yost from the same article linked to above:
“I like what I see,” Yost said. “He’s a guy who has tremendous stuff, and he commands the ball down. You can see how he was an All-Star closer in years past. He’s a power pitcher with command.”
I guess that’s better than something negative, but it just sounds like fluff to me, so it is tough to get too excited about Broxton’s health and potential to rebound. We know he was great when healthy, never posting a SIERA mark above 3.00 in a full season. I think it would be a surprise if he’s handed the closing role out of the gate. If anything, I would guess the Royals ease him back into relief work and if he shows that he is healthy again and his stuff and command have returned, consider moving him into the closer role.
Crow was supposed to move into the rotation and make the transition during the spring. However, Danny Duffy has learned a cutter and got rave reviews after his spring debut, so he may now be the favorite to land the fifth slot in the rotation. That would presumably push Crow back into the bullpen, where he was right behind Holland in gmLI last season. Crow posted an excellent strikeout rate last year to go along with a ground ball rate above 50%, but struggled with his control. All told though, he posted a solid 3.27 SIERA, suggesting he does have good enough skills to hold onto the closer job.
If I were a Soria owner, I’d be supremely worried at the moment. Last season’s first half suggested he was hurt and would have made this elbow injury no surprise, but his skills rebounded in the second half making it more likely that this is a new injury. Either way, it’s time to speculate on replacements, though it may be too late by the time you read this article! I think Holland should be the favorite, while Crow is the dark horse. I truly don’t think they will throw Broxton right into the closer role after just returning from surgery. The good news is that while Holland may already be picked up by teams, Crow is a less obvious candidate and may still be available.
No love for Kelvin Herrera?
He has better velo than the three above and according to BA, has the best pure stuff in the Royals system. He dominated at three levels last year before an underwhelming 2 innings with the big club, allowing 42 hits in 68 innings with a 70/15 K/BB. The fly in the ointment is that he surrendered 6 HR. Still, he has matched Holland’s strong start this spring. Ironically, one thing besides his inexperience that may push him into a middle-man role is that repertoire. According to BA:
“He has been clocked as high as 102 mph, consistently touches 100 and sits at 95-98 mph with his overpowering fastball. He backs up his heat with a solid curveball and even flashes a plus changeup with late tumbling action, though he doesn’t use the changeup as much in a relief role.”
To be honest, I didn’t even bother to look any deeper into the pen. It would be a shock if one of the above three didn’t come out of ST with the closer role if Soria misses time.
Would you pick Herrera if you were Yost? Guy’s got skills, but he’s also got all of two innings of MLB ball under his belt.
Probably not. Then again, I think it would come down to a choice between throwing Broxton in the role, hoping to inflate his trade value, or slotting a guy that looks like Soria’s successor there for the time being. I think Holland and Herrera are better candidates for that than Crow, especially if the Royals think Crow is going to be capable of starting.
While I think Holland is more ready for the job, he is 5 years older so we may have already seen his peak. Herrera seems like the guy I’d lean towards long-term so if the Royals see him shutting down major leaguers now, they might be inclined to think the same. Whether exposure is helpful from a development standpoint is something for the professionals to decide. It wouldn’t be the first time somebody got a temporary shot at closing before they were totally established (like half of the Cardinals bullpen last season, not to mention Joakim Soria, once upon a time).
i think somebody owns herrera on their fantasy team
personally i own holland, so i think this is all garbage
Holland seems to currently have the best combination of health, performance and seniority. But lots of managers are partial towards guys who have “done it before”, which is why Broxton is probably next up. Although Broxton is probably the one with the most question marks (awful ’11 performance, coming off of surgery).
Holland has done it, sort of – he was the closer at the end of last season when Soria was down with a sore hamstring.
Can’t remember where I learned about it, maybe Twitter, but in Broxton’s 2nd outing I recall he was up to 97mph.
I saw the same velocity number thrown out. I also agree feel that Broxton gets the gig if Soria can’t go this season as an attempt to move him in the Summer. Then Herrera who should be the successor would be given a shot in Spring of next year or after Broxton is traded assuming a solid season this year in a setup role.
Either way I don’t think this is catastrophic and the Royals could have done any number of things differently with the Artist Formerly Known as the Mexicutioner. He could have at least been tried out as a starter, or moved once it was obvious the team was terrible for a few years back in 2010 or last year.
According to the readings shown on the broadcasts, Broxton seems to be sitting 91-94. Got up to 96 multiple times with two strikes.
As much as I’d like Holland to get the job, I find it tough to think they’d pass over Broxton. Yost has said that Broxton was “eye-popping,” and he doesn’t seem to be the type of out of the box thinker (like most managers) that would pass over a guy with 50+ career saves for a guy with 4.
Wasn’t Crow briefly the closer last year when Soria was struggling, even though he got no save opps?
One nit to pick: Trey Hillman did not manage the Royals at any time during the 2011 season.
And thank the Lord Crash Davis for that!
Ha, I read the wrong year, it was 2010, not 2011. Oops
My recollection is that Broxton at his peak was 97-99. When rehabbing with the Dodgers over the last couple of years, much was made of him getting back to 94-95 (he had been in the low 90s) but he was never nearly as effective at that velocity.
Yeah, apparently hitters bat .300+ on Broxton when he’s under 95mph and .200 on him when he’s throwing over 95mph. He’s clocked in as high as 96 in spring ball, but not constantly. It’ll be interesting to see what happens as Aaron Crow landed the gig when Soria was ‘demoted’ last year, but never got a save opportunity while Holland had a small handful. It’s such a crapshoot that it seems like your best best is to take Holland because he’s the best pitcher and will help your ERA/K/WHIP, and hope it works itself out even if it starts out with Brox on top.