That’s One Skinny Sad Panda, Taking Strike One

Contract year. He got skinny. He’s 27 years old. This will be the Panda’s year. This will be the year Pablo Sandoval puts it all together.

So far, so not good. Sandoval’s power is down, his strikeout rate is up, his swing metrics are all messed up, and his owners are considering dropping him in mixed leagues. What’s up with this skinny sad Panda?

We know that power takes a while to stabilize, so we can let him off the hook for career-low power numbers. After all, he could hit three homers in the next game and everything would look different. He’s done that before, famously.

And of course we can give his .205 batting average on balls in play a nod. He’s currently hitting twice as many infield fly balls as he normally does, but he’s been league average in that department for his career, and even with a bad pop-up rate, you’d expect his BABIP to be over the Mendoza line.

But wander over into his swing metrics, and everything is all screwed up. Imagine what you might have told Pablo Sandoval he needed to change going into the season. I’m guessing you would have told him to stop reaching for that got dang pitch at his eyes and would he please just learn to work a count. Well, he got half of that right so far:

Swing% O-Swing% Z-Swing% swSTR%
Pablo Sandoval 2014 51.8% 41.4% 68.1% 12.0%
Pablo Sandoval Career 57.8% 45.0% 79.7% 9.8%

So he’s swinging less and reaching less, but unfortunately, he’s also swinging at pitches inside the zone less, too. But it turns out, *when* he’s swinging is much more important than *which pitches* he’s swinging at. Look at his swing percentage on the first pitch over the course of his career:

Season First Pitch Swing%
2008 0.500
2009 0.490
2010 0.414
2011 0.408
2012 0.420
2013 0.424
2014 0.271

Oops. The league average first-pitch strike rate in baseball is 60%, and he’s halved his swing rate at the pitch. That means many more oh-and-one counts, and many fewer hitter-friendly counts. For a guy that normally swings so much, giving away strike one isn’t recommended (well, it’s bad for everyone). Of course, pitchers are afraid of his free-swinging ways, so right now they’re throwing him a first-pitch strike a little less than usual (52.5%, 61.3% career), but the more word gets out that he’s taking strike one, the more they’ll venture back into the zone.

Of course, that would make for a perfect time for him to start being aggressive on the first pitch again, and he could break out of this funk. Swing metrics are stable at this point, but they still only explain 50% of future variance when stable. Probably because players can change their plan of attack when it comes to swing rates. Sandoval could just decide he’s had enough of this approach, and go back to swinging at everything from the eyes to the laces.

In this case, that would be a welcome change, the Pablo Sandoval of old. Perhaps his strikeout rate would improve, at least. Not every good player fits into our cookie cutter definition of the perfect player. It looks like Pablo Sandoval needs to remember what it felt like to be Pablo Sandoval again.

Until he does, we’re left with a player that could still hit .280 with 20 homers, but whose projections have moved south of that pace due to his early-season strikeout rate. Considering that Kyle Seager is on the mend, and Aramis Ramirez is healthy, and Todd Frazier is playing really well, you probably have some options in a mixed league that make more sense than holding on to a messed-up Pablo. The toughest decision may be right around Chase Headley, who adds speed and a less messed-up swing rate trend. But if you’re looking at Trevor Plouffe (despite his improvements, Plouffe doesn’t have the same batting average upside) or Chris Johnson (who is mostly batting average when it’s working out anyway), you may want to hold on for just a bit longer and watch Pablo on the first pitch.




Print This Post

Graphs: Baseball, Roto, Beer, brats (OK, no graphs for that...yet), repeat. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris.


18 Responses to “That’s One Skinny Sad Panda, Taking Strike One”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. Menthol says:

    Dude is just killing me this year.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Dallas says:

    He’s probably cycling off PEDs. Took Pujols 2 years to get his swing back afterwards.

    -22 Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Hamranhansenhansen says:

      Panda is cycling off pizza and other cheesy foods. Just like we asked him to.

      And he is trying to be the player he thinks teams want to pay for by taking pitches. And he doesn’t trust his agent, so he is thinking all the time about a contract and pressing. He needed the early extension more than Pence, but his agent needs a high profile free agent to establish his new business.

      With all those reasons, why go looking for another?

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Lars says:

    Thanks for addressing and analyzing this issue. Hopefully my patience pays off as I reluctantly roll him out there every day.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Sgt. Hulka says:

    Thinking about trading for him. Was thinking about a package of Arenado+ for Panda+ in a 16-team league. Still trying to figure out if it’s worth it to try.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • stuck in a slump says:

      Is it a keeper or redraft?

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Sgt. Hulka says:

        Redraft.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • stuck in a slump says:

        Yeah, I wouldn’t do that at all. Arenado is younger, has a better park, and as of yet, hasn’t shown the type of inconsistencies that Sandoval has.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Sgt. Hulka says:

        Thanks. I was thinking of getting enough in return to offset the drop in talent.

        Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Satoshi Nakamoto says:

      Oh man I would jump all over that.
      Meaning, if you can get Arenado for Pando you absolutely should do it. Arenado: better ballpark, better lineup, more power, on upswing of career rather than bumbling about like Panda.

      Plus his nickname is not kung fu panda.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. David says:

    You dumpped the wrong Z Swing% data into your table. From his player page, it’s 68.1% this year and 79.7% career. So the drop-off from career is even higher than you report.

    It’s also interesting to note that all of his contact% rates are down precipitously as well this year. Likely a sign that the effort to be more selective is leading to worse timing when he does cut loose and swing.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Jaker says:

      Yeah his contact is down from ~83% career to 76% this year (which obviously goes hand-in-hand with the SwStr%). Career low. And more of that loss is on inside contact.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Hamranhansenhansen says:

      You can’t think and hit at the same time (Yogi Berra) but you can see the gears grinding when Panda is at the plate this year. Then every once in a while he looks like he is just reacting and he looks like old Panda, either knocking the first pitch the other way, or fouling off 8 pitches and knocking the ball down a line for a double.

      If I were Panda, I would get a new agent, charge him with all the worrying and thinking, and then go out and have the time of my life playing baseball with the front brain switched off. When he just sees the ball and hits the ball, not only does he have success, but he makes pitchers afraid because he will hit the unhittable pitches and they don’t know what to do to get him out.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. Whatever says:

    Feels like Pablo is the hitting version of CC Sabathia. They dont feel right in skinny bodies.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. Will says:

    Why has nobody made the connection to the South Park/pedophilia reference in the title of this article (albeit one used on an earlier article on Sandoval a few years back)? Shame on you too-PC commentators, shame on you.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. dp says:

    Inexplicably, I think of Sifl and Olly instead of South Park when I think of Sandoval. This is probably because I’m old: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUnulhwJTsQ

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>