Who’s Behind Matt Kemp?

A Stud with a capital ‘S’ went down in many outfields this week when the Dodgers decided that Matt Kemp and his balky hamstring needed at least two weeks to mend. Since deep leaguers often need to pick up the team’s actual replacement — anybody else with power and speed is already owned — let’s see if the Dodgers themselves will produce a fantasy-worthy replacement.

Literally, in center field, it’s probably Tony Gwynn, Jr. that will get the reps. If speed is your need, he could replace Kemp’s stolen bases in the short term, but there’s no sign that he’ll do much more than hit .260 with 40ish stolen base pace. Despite a nice swinging strike rate (5.9% this year, 5.1% career), we know that he’ll strike out too much (15.7% this year, 15.9% career) and lacks the power (.081 ISO this year, .077 career) to put up a nice batting average. Then again, he’s walking more (8.6%, up from 6.8% last year), and it’s in line with his career work in the rate (9.3%), and that will at least give him more chances to steal bags. With the Dodgers functioning as a Green Light Organization, his help in that category is a known known.

But there’s still playing time to be had. So far, most of Gwynn’s work has come in left field. Moving him to center opens up playing time for the newly acquired Bobby Abreu, who could hit .260 with a stolen base and a home run while Kemp was out, if that’s what you wanted. But there’s at least an outside chance that Scott Van Slyke gets the playing time — at least against lefties. Then again, his only start so far came against righty Alex White.

What happens if the Dodgers hand the interim role to the son of Andy Van Slyke? It’s actually a fairly exciting prospect, even if he’s not a really exciting prospect — Marc Hulet didn’t even put him in the Dodgers’ top 15 this year. Mostly that’s because Slyke took a long time to get to the high minors, and the first time he really had a good year at Double-A or above was in 2011, when he hit .348/.427/.595 in the Southern League… at 24 years old. Still, he wasn’t a man among boys (the average age in that league was 24.4 last year), and the Southern League is no Pacific Coast League. His peripherals look decent, and though his major league strikeout rate is an unknown, at least he’s coming in with fewer whiffs than Jerry Sands. If he got the playing time, he could be more of a boon in power stats, might be able to manage a good batting average, and would steal a few bags.

And, yes, Jerry Sands is on the team. As a righty, though, he’s in direct competition with Van Slyke. He’s proven himself to have a contact issue, his power didn’t translate in a third-of-a-season sample last year, and he was hitting .241/.333/.403 in Albuquerque of the PCL this year. He’s a year younger, but the Dodgers are most likely in “What have you done for me lately” mode. And Van Slyke is the guy that has actually played since Matt Kemp went down.

With the Dodgers in first, it might just be a straight Abreu/Van Slyke platoon based on handedness. That seems safe with a little bit of upside. The only wrinkle is that Van Slyke has already seen a righty, which makes him the upside play for the next couple of weeks.

Print This Post

Graphs: Baseball, Roto, Beer, brats (OK, no graphs for that...yet), repeat. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris.

2 Responses to “Who’s Behind Matt Kemp?”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. unlazy4sports says:

    As a Dodger fan, I think you’re right about the Abreu/Van Slyke platoon for the most part. Ethier took a few flyballs in center yesterday before the game, so Abreu will play against some lefties. There’ll also be a few games with both Van Slyke and Sands in there while Loney sits against lefties.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. divakar says:

    While the Van Slyke experiment may be the correct move for the Dodgers outfield, Sands hasn’t been as bad as advertised. He does have significant trouble getting on base against righties, but even that has been exaggerated as he still has power against them.

    1. His development didn’t require him to be promoted last year, but he was. So, there’s that. Probably shouldn’t factor into our evaluation of him TOO much…

    2. He actually hit .257/.348/.485 so far this year in AAA. He started off as badly as one could imagine, but has been quite good lately. His 21/28 bb/k ratio and 15/35 xbh/h ratio are also quite good, especially considering the hole he dug himself.

    3. Dude has legit power, no question about it.

    Given his past track record, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if Sands takes his previous ML experience and makes adjustments that keep him in the majors this year. He may never OPS over .900, but as they say “you don’t teach power” and he certainly can hit the ball donkey far.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>