UZR
Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR) is one of the most widely used, publicly available defensive statistics. The theory behind UZR is tougher to intuitively grasp than Defensive Runs Saved (DRS), but the simplified version is that UZR puts a run value to defense, attempting to quantify how many runs a player saved or gave up through their fielding prowess (or lack thereof). There are a couple different components to UZR, including:
● Outfield Arm Runs (ARM) – The amount of runs above average an outfielder saves with their arm by preventing runners to advance.
● Double-Play Runs (DPR) – The amount of runs above average an infielder is in turning double-plays.
● Range Runs (RngR) – Is the player an Ozzie Smith or an Adam Dunn? Do they get to more balls than average or not?
● Error Runs (ErrR) – Does the player commit more or fewer errors compared with a league-average player at their position?
The run values in each of these categories are then compiled into one overall defensive score, UZR. Since UZR is measured in runs, it can be compared easily with a player’s offensive contributions (wRAA).
For the details on how UZR is calculated — i.e. how we can attach a run value to defensive events — see the FanGraphs UZR Primer.
Context:
Since defensive statistics are still relatively new, they should not be taken as 100% dead accurate. Before drawing any conclusions about a player’s defense, look at a full three years of defensive data, drop the decimal points and take an average, and compare UZR scores with other defensive metrics (DRS, TZL, etc.). By taking a broader picture, you will help ensure that you’re not being over-confident or overstating a player’s defensive abilities.
In general, UZR scores can be broken down into the following tiers. This is a good shorthand way of evaluating a player’s defensive ability level:
| Defensive Ability | UZR |
|---|---|
| Gold Glove Caliber | +15 |
| Great | +10 |
| Above Average | +5 |
| Average | 0 |
| Below Average | -5 |
| Poor | -10 |
| Awful | -15 |
Things to Remember:
● Beware of sample sizes! If a player only spent 50 innings at a position last season, it’d be a good idea not to draw too many conclusions from their UZR score over that time. Like with any defensive statistic, you should always use three years of UZR data before trying to draw any conclusions on the true talent level of a fielder.
● UZR uses Baseball Info Solutions (BIS) data in calculating its results. It’s important to note that this data is compiled by human scorers, which means that it likely includes some human error. Until FIELDF/x data gets released to the public, we are never going to have wholly accurate defensive data; human error is impossible to avoid when recording fielding locations by hand, no matter how meticulous the scorers. That said, BIS data is still the best, most accurate defensive data available at this time, so just be careful not to overstate claims of a player’s defensive prowess based solely on defensive stats.
● Since UZR is a counting statistic like RBIs or HRs, the more playing time a player accrues, the higher (or lower) their UZR will be. In order to compare players with different amounts of playing time, UZR can be scaled on a 150 game basis (UZR/150). If you want to compare a player with 90 games played to someone with 140, UZR/150 would be the way to do so.
● UZR is park-adjusted, meaning it adjusts for the fact that fielders have to deal with odd quirks in certain ballparks.
Links for Further Reading:
Intro to UZR – Big League Stew
The Mike Silva Chronicles: UZR – The Book Blog
Similarities and Differences: UZR and Dewan +/-













4
Wait why would dividing UZR by 150 even things out? shouldn’t you divide it by the number of games they played and then multiply by 150? Or is UZR/150 just the name of the statistic
Good question. Instead of thinking of it as UZR divided by 150 (because it’s not that simple), consider it as UZR per 150 games.
I know this is a year old post, but just in case someone reads this, how come Jose Lopez has a UZR of 8.1 and a UZR/150 of 7.5 at 3B in 2010? He played in 150 games that year, albeit Yahoo says he DH’d in eight games, and played 3B in 142. Still, if this is a counting stat, shouldn’t his UZR/150 be higher…? I have to assume its not as simple as UZR divided by games played at the position, multiplied by 150…?
gostaria de revender como faco
Information Report. Was’t a few was probably particularly trying to get when My husband and i dug into Msn your site showed up i found out not to mention i thought i’d as a minimum many thanks.
Still has a long way to go. For example, anyone who has seen A. Cabrera play knows he is one of the best defensive shortstops in the AL. Yet he is ranked dead last. Suzuki is also very underrated.
I’ve had the same question as CamraMaan; is UZR/150 actually scaled to 150 games played or some amount of innings, like 1350? I’ve tried to figure it out both ways and it never seemed like UZR/150 was based on 150 games or 1350 innings of a player’s production.
I’m assuming Kincaid’s explain is correct here: http://www.fangraphs.com/forums/topic.php?id=3256 ?