<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: wRC and wRC+</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/library</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/#comment-195693</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrlibrary.wordpress.com/?page_id=65#comment-195693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand that an OPS of .000 translates into an OPS+ of -100, instead of 0, because OPS+ is actually a combination of OBP+ and SLG+. So, that makes sense to me. But the minimum ERA+ (infinite ERA) is 0, not -100. Which makes sense, because it&#039;s only based on 1 stat instead of 2.

So why a wOBA of .000 translate into a wRC+ of -100, instead of 0? 0 seems to be much lower than &quot;replacement value&quot;. Does a wRC+ of 0 have some meaning?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that an OPS of .000 translates into an OPS+ of -100, instead of 0, because OPS+ is actually a combination of OBP+ and SLG+. So, that makes sense to me. But the minimum ERA+ (infinite ERA) is 0, not -100. Which makes sense, because it&#8217;s only based on 1 stat instead of 2.</p>
<p>So why a wOBA of .000 translate into a wRC+ of -100, instead of 0? 0 seems to be much lower than &#8220;replacement value&#8221;. Does a wRC+ of 0 have some meaning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/#comment-125173</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrlibrary.wordpress.com/?page_id=65#comment-125173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a question, are wRC figures shown for minor league players converted to major league equivalents, or do they apply to the league/level they are playing in? 

For instance, let&#039;s say a AAA player had a wRC of 30. Would that indicate his numbers convert to a wRC playing in the majors, or that is the adjusted number of runs he created in the minors? 

Another question that this group could weigh in on... I have a shadow team of the Pirates that I&#039;ve kept track of since late 2007, a fun exercise for baseball nerds like us. I&#039;m trying to figure out the best way to calculate wins/losses for my team. 

I&#039;ve been using an adjusted version of RC to calculate my Runs Scored. Before adjusted RC figures were widely quoted, I used to arbitrarily adjust for league/park after looking at aggregate league vs league stats. To get Runs Allowed, I tally up the total Earned Runs for my staff, add the average difference between Runs Allowed and ER (for all teams that year) then adjust my Runs Allowed figure to account for each position player&#039;s Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). Is there a better way? WAR? Does that accurately reflect the value of relievers? What about converting minor league players to a major league WAR? Or using pitchers differently (bullpen/starting). For instance, Max Ramirez is my catcher (I still don&#039;t think his defense is THAT bad, given his bat which just needed a chance to play... think Nelson Cruz, whom I picked off waivers in early 2008) and I consider Aroldis Chapman a starter. I think last year I added 30% to his real ERA and limited his innings to about 160 and called it good (pretty fair given he pitched at GAB). Hell he was a starter in Cuba and lights out in the WBC. He can&#039;t be that bad.  

Of course, once I know RS and RA, then I just convert it to wins/losses using the pythorgean win/loss formula. 

If anybody has done this or can suggest a method for calculating the estimated win/loss record for a shadow team, I would appreciate any suggestions. Furthermore, if there are any dynasty leagues out there that operate on a expected win/loss basis as opposed to arbitrarily getting points for SB&#039;s and RBI&#039;s, I&#039;d be interested in joining. Building the best TEAM would be so much more fun than building a roster around who will get the most RBI chances or chances to score runs or the most wins (for pitchers). 

-Andy

PS... what I&#039;ve learned in keeping a shadow team for five years... I can build a winning team within a budget, but it took a lot longer than I expected and drafting is really a crap shoot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question, are wRC figures shown for minor league players converted to major league equivalents, or do they apply to the league/level they are playing in? </p>
<p>For instance, let&#8217;s say a AAA player had a wRC of 30. Would that indicate his numbers convert to a wRC playing in the majors, or that is the adjusted number of runs he created in the minors? </p>
<p>Another question that this group could weigh in on&#8230; I have a shadow team of the Pirates that I&#8217;ve kept track of since late 2007, a fun exercise for baseball nerds like us. I&#8217;m trying to figure out the best way to calculate wins/losses for my team. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using an adjusted version of RC to calculate my Runs Scored. Before adjusted RC figures were widely quoted, I used to arbitrarily adjust for league/park after looking at aggregate league vs league stats. To get Runs Allowed, I tally up the total Earned Runs for my staff, add the average difference between Runs Allowed and ER (for all teams that year) then adjust my Runs Allowed figure to account for each position player&#8217;s Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). Is there a better way? WAR? Does that accurately reflect the value of relievers? What about converting minor league players to a major league WAR? Or using pitchers differently (bullpen/starting). For instance, Max Ramirez is my catcher (I still don&#8217;t think his defense is THAT bad, given his bat which just needed a chance to play&#8230; think Nelson Cruz, whom I picked off waivers in early 2008) and I consider Aroldis Chapman a starter. I think last year I added 30% to his real ERA and limited his innings to about 160 and called it good (pretty fair given he pitched at GAB). Hell he was a starter in Cuba and lights out in the WBC. He can&#8217;t be that bad.  </p>
<p>Of course, once I know RS and RA, then I just convert it to wins/losses using the pythorgean win/loss formula. </p>
<p>If anybody has done this or can suggest a method for calculating the estimated win/loss record for a shadow team, I would appreciate any suggestions. Furthermore, if there are any dynasty leagues out there that operate on a expected win/loss basis as opposed to arbitrarily getting points for SB&#8217;s and RBI&#8217;s, I&#8217;d be interested in joining. Building the best TEAM would be so much more fun than building a roster around who will get the most RBI chances or chances to score runs or the most wins (for pitchers). </p>
<p>-Andy</p>
<p>PS&#8230; what I&#8217;ve learned in keeping a shadow team for five years&#8230; I can build a winning team within a budget, but it took a lot longer than I expected and drafting is really a crap shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/#comment-114506</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrlibrary.wordpress.com/?page_id=65#comment-114506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh wait, never mind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wait, never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/#comment-114505</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrlibrary.wordpress.com/?page_id=65#comment-114505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If you’re thinking about using OPS+, use wRC+ instead. wRC+ is based off of wOBA and is regarded as a more accurate depiction of a player’s offensive value.&quot;

Uhhh having a little trouble with this line. Is the first wRC+ supposed to be wRAA?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you’re thinking about using OPS+, use wRC+ instead. wRC+ is based off of wOBA and is regarded as a more accurate depiction of a player’s offensive value.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uhhh having a little trouble with this line. Is the first wRC+ supposed to be wRAA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RandomGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/#comment-106074</link>
		<dc:creator>RandomGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 06:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrlibrary.wordpress.com/?page_id=65#comment-106074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m guessing the chart is supposed to be for wRC instead of wRC+. It mentions that in the sentence above it and it seems to make more sense that way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing the chart is supposed to be for wRC instead of wRC+. It mentions that in the sentence above it and it seems to make more sense that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: byron</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/#comment-106029</link>
		<dc:creator>byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 05:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrlibrary.wordpress.com/?page_id=65#comment-106029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I, too, think 100 is average for wRC+, and I also wonder why every year on the league stats page has an average wRC+ of 96 or 97. Pitchers?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, think 100 is average for wRC+, and I also wonder why every year on the league stats page has an average wRC+ of 96 or 97. Pitchers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/#comment-104803</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrlibrary.wordpress.com/?page_id=65#comment-104803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This confused me too.  I think the chart is wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This confused me too.  I think the chart is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/#comment-100344</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 02:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrlibrary.wordpress.com/?page_id=65#comment-100344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking about wRC+ specifically.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking about wRC+ specifically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/#comment-100343</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 02:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrlibrary.wordpress.com/?page_id=65#comment-100343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m confused. The 2nd paragraph in the article says that 100 is average, but the chart below it says that 60 is average. Which is correct?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. The 2nd paragraph in the article says that 100 is average, but the chart below it says that 60 is average. Which is correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJC</title>
		<link>http://www.fangraphs.com/library/offense/wrc/#comment-99977</link>
		<dc:creator>PJC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sabrlibrary.wordpress.com/?page_id=65#comment-99977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The calculation of wRC uses lgwOBA (in getting difference between wOBA and lgwOBA) and lgR/PA (added in to arrive at wRC).  Does lgwOBA/wOBAScale equal lgR/PA?  It would seem the latter reflects actual runs scored, whereas as the former reflects implied runs/PA based on the inputs to wOBA.  Can someone tell me if I am thinking about this correctly?  An explanation as to the difference would be much appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The calculation of wRC uses lgwOBA (in getting difference between wOBA and lgwOBA) and lgR/PA (added in to arrive at wRC).  Does lgwOBA/wOBAScale equal lgR/PA?  It would seem the latter reflects actual runs scored, whereas as the former reflects implied runs/PA based on the inputs to wOBA.  Can someone tell me if I am thinking about this correctly?  An explanation as to the difference would be much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
