NotGraphs Baseball

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. What’s the formula for Cheers Above Replacement?

    Comment by harry — April 19, 2012 @ 1:50 pm

  2. We Nats fans are a pithy and erudite lot.

    Comment by pbs — April 19, 2012 @ 1:52 pm

  3. Also, does W/Cm adjust for starting pitcher name. E.g. if Cliff Lee is pitching against Jordan Zimmermann, I think an adjustment should be made

    Comment by Michael — April 19, 2012 @ 1:57 pm

  4. Well, generally, players with longer names attract smarter people. For example, the Red Sox are among the smartest fan bases (all of them go to some various college in Boston), and their catcerh is named Saltalamachiatolamarachimoroccomassachusettsmelancholymarmalademachia.

    Comment by Jack — April 19, 2012 @ 2:04 pm

  5. The low FB/G is a direct response to Ozzie’s influence on the Marlins.

    Comment by Illinois glass M. Michael Sheets — April 19, 2012 @ 2:09 pm

  6. Although the metric can be calculated from the numbers above, I think that the comments per user is most telling. And a quick calculation shows that, at an average of over 8 comments per person, the Mets fans just talk too damn much.

    Comment by RobBob — April 19, 2012 @ 2:55 pm

  7. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

    Comment by BlackOps — April 19, 2012 @ 3:53 pm

  8. Does this count as an f-bomb? Obviously, the intent is there. You also have to consider possible misspellings. Considering Mets fans appear to be less erudite than their peers, I imagine the f-bomb number could be deflated by those who miss a ‘k’ in there, or add an ‘e’ at the end.

    Comment by Jack — April 19, 2012 @ 4:09 pm

  9. Is a Ph-bomb in a Phillies blog an F-bomb or a distinctly different event? If it’s the latter, then that would explain why the Phillies blog’s FB/G is so low.

    Comment by reillocity — April 19, 2012 @ 5:15 pm

  10. Yet another group of stats that the Rangers will be leading the majors in.

    Comment by lonestarball — April 19, 2012 @ 6:21 pm

  11. If you divide CM/G by FB/G, which is the number of comments before you see an F Bomb,

    you get an F Bomb

    Phillies every 31 comments
    Mets every 148
    Braves every 458
    Nationals every 7702

    Comment by lockwood11j — April 19, 2012 @ 6:49 pm

  12. like button

    Comment by Eno Sarris — April 19, 2012 @ 8:18 pm

  13. It also unfairly elevates their Ch/W because they turn all Fs into PHs.

    I blame griping about Jason Bay for the Mets low Ch/W. Actually, it’s probably vampires or something .

    Comment by Ceetar — April 19, 2012 @ 8:38 pm

  14. You continue to raise the bar, Mississippi. Outstanding.

    Comment by Navin Vaswani — April 19, 2012 @ 9:38 pm

  15. I’m pretty sure Tom Tango did some work showing that fanbases, in general, can’t control CM/FB, and it takes ~100 blown saves to stabilise. Look for some regression to the mean from the Nationals, who can’t possibly sustain this prudishness over a full season.

    Comment by CJ — April 20, 2012 @ 3:10 am

  16. I think vegetarians could PROBABLY use this research to prove that the higher your cheesesteak consumption, the lower your overall capacity for intelligent expression, judging by Ch/W and FB/G alone. Of course, one may argue back that constant reference to the fightin’ Phils is BOUND to put one in an F-Bomb frame of fandom. I mean, that’s just altogether amateur alliteration awareness. If Phillies fans simply ate more salad, this entire discussion would be unnecessary.

    Comment by Angelpants — April 20, 2012 @ 3:19 am

  17. If anyone were to ask me, “Hey, CurtisStarkeyFan4Life, how are you doing today?” My default answer is, “ROBBED AND FULL OF RAGE!”

    Today boys, today! I am impressed.

    Comment by CurtisStarkeyFan4Life — April 20, 2012 @ 5:17 am

  18. This definitely passes the smell test when it comes to Phillies fans…

    Comment by Fletch — April 20, 2012 @ 1:54 pm

  19. If it were Dios Mios per game, I’m sure it’d be through the roof

    Comment by Michael — April 20, 2012 @ 3:57 pm

  20. As a prudish Nationals fan, I think I am skewing their results by interjecting colourful Anglicised curses like ‘bloody’. Were I a Well-Beered Irishman, I would spell it ‘feck,’ besides.

    Comment by Well-Beered Englishman — April 20, 2012 @ 4:50 pm

  21. Sorry, I meant to reply to CJ.

    Comment by Well-Beered Englishman — April 20, 2012 @ 4:50 pm

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Current day month ye@r *

Close this window.

0.176 Powered by WordPress