An Open Letter to the Shirtless Man

baseball-fan-with-shirt-off

Note: Not the actual shirtless man in question.

I saw you, shirtless man.

I saw you in the stands, a few rows behind the dugout while a professional athlete pitched. I saw you and I shuddered. I saw you and I giggled. I saw you and I pressed rewind, and on your meaty physique I paused the TV image.

I wondered: What possessed you, shirtless man? What possessed you to remove your garment – the lone barrier between your torso and the rest of the civilized world – during a nationally televised game at Camden Yards? Had your man boobs felt confined – perhaps pent-up or even claustrophobic, as if prisoners of our prudish times – by the shirt that you had selected just hours before your display? Had your “huddled masses” yearned to breathe free, to break the weave of oppression and wobble unfettered near our nation’s Eastern shore? Did you crave the libertarian bliss of defying decorum – of rejecting convention – in proximity to our nation’s capital, or merely enjoy the idea of a stranger gazing downward, into the mysterious recesses of your butt crack, and wondering if you had ever enjoyed the ministrations of a Parisian bidet?

I am curious, shirtless man. Do you find folly in our sartorial attempts at public modesty, the rules of conduct that prevent children and teens from seeing, alas, how our bodies will betray us? Do you consider our dress codes anathema to the conscious liberties enshrined in our founding documents, or do they merely render it more enjoyable when, presumably, you spike the volleyball at your local nudist resort before sitting for sloppy joes?

Shirtless man, I remain intrigued. Was it important that your perspiration, rather than collect in orthodox patches in the conformist fabric of our oppressors, ooze down the contours of your dude bosom before gathering in sovereign droplets on your rebellious belly hairs? Were you a conscientious objector to the status quo, a civilly disobedient activist whose breasts would stand – or, rather, droop – as symbols of self-determination, or was it important simply that a national audience register educated guesses as to your cup size, were you to do the humane thing and wear an underwire bra?

Shirtless man, my questions beg for answers. Did you smile inwardly, or even laugh outwardly, when considering that a stranger might be playing tic-tac-toe, whether he wants to or not, with the constellation of moles on your doublewide back? Did you nod with satisfaction when concluding that he had spent the better part of three innings speculating as to the tensile strength of that one magnificent mole hair, or, instead, did you sacrifice your pride in service to militant activism? Did you nod contentedly, or even sadistically, in the presumption that your ingrown back hairs, coupled with the inscrutable creases beneath your ponderous shoulder blades, had caused him to lose his appetite and therefore ditch his half-eaten hot dog? Or did you consider him an unfortunate casualty of your challenge to social politesse?

Shirtless man, tell me if I’m misguided. Am I, indeed, on the wrong track? For example: Rather than serve as the twin beacons of your brave demonstration, did your nipples seek a more self-serving end? Had they, for instance, defied the limits of anatomy by developing the ability to see? If so, did they wish to enjoy the nonpartisan beauty of the Pastime, or, rather, did they have a rooting interest in the Orioles, perhaps because “orioles” sounds a lot like “areolas”?

Are you, among all the world’s mammals, alone in the ability to witness athletic contests solely through the paired mammillae on your chest? Or, instead, do you simply hope that we bear witness those same mammillae?




Print This Post

John, who has also written under the pseudonym "Azure Texan," writes for both The Hardball Times and NotGraphs.


15 Responses to “An Open Letter to the Shirtless Man”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. (Still) James says:

    I get it, because he’s fat.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • John Paschal says:

      Eh, not exactly. It’s really about an older man’s choice to remove his shirt in a public venue. It is a choice I support, mind you, simply because the choice exists. But it is an interesting choice nonetheless. The post is as much about unsightly moles and mole hairs as it is about the guy not being Hercules. That said, humor – or the attempt at humor – often runs the risk of offending people. I suppose that is ironic, but it’s true. I apologize if I offended anyone.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Simon says:

    This is very well written.
    For a NG post, that is.

    You really should have provided a gif of the guy, or at least a regular pic.
    Clayton Kershaw is god.

    Well written, is the takeaway here.
    Unlike this comment.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • John Paschal says:

      Much obliged, Simon.

      As for a gif: Hmmm. The first thing you should know is that I’m an absolute Luddite. It’s really kind of amazing that I’m typing these words on this here typin’ machine. So I have no idea how to make a gif. I suppose I could learn, but what fun would that be? (Possible answer: Lots of fun.) The kicker, though, is that I assume one would make a gif on a computer, not on a flat-screen TV in the living room, which is precisely where I saw the image in question. I’d need to hire my own IT department for that, but I used all my disposable income on an areola/aureola research department.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. southie says:

    when people abroad think of ‘Merica this is presumably the image in their heads.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Phil West says:

    I’m pretty sure you mean Areola.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • John Paschal says:

      Welp, according to some dictionaries, you’re absolutely right. According to other dictionaries, aureola is synonymous with areola. So as long as we’re not English professors, it’s probably a toss-up. Now, technically, the plural should be either “aureolae” or “areolae,” but of course the joke doesn’t work as well, assuming it works spectacularly well otherwise. In addition, some colloquial sources do endorse “areolas.” It’s all so confusing. So, in summation, I guess I’ll compromise by going with areolas.

      Fixed! (I think.)

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. rick lancellotti says:

    What is this guy like Carson Cisterlli 2.0 or something?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. Sjcstavros says:

    The shirtless man doesn’t go far enough, I say. Cast off these oppressive social constructs – vive la nudité!!

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. Bill says:

    Perhaps you read too much into this? Perhaps he is not some modern Theseus confronting the gods of decorum nor a man gifted with possum videre man-boobs, rather he’s simply drunk off his ass.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *