Calculated: More Component Park Factors for Kauffman Stadium

Kauffman Stadium is a tough park. Sure, it has those nice fountains and that massive scoreboard, but have you ever tried to put together a winning team there? Earlier this season, then-Royals hitting coach Jack Maloof noted that since the Royals’ home stadium deflates home run rates, there was no point in trying. That is obviously the main why the Royals are tied with the AAA-and-a-half Marlins for last in baseball in home runs.

[In an unrelated event, Maloof was shortly thereafter relieved of his duties and replaced with (interim) hitting coach George Brett. Maloof and co-coach Andre David were sent back down to coach in the minors, where they can work their magic again with young Royals hitters, just like they did with Eric Hosmer and Mike Moustakas.]

The K is not just responsible for the Royals’ relative inability to hit the ball out of the park. It also is responsible for their longstanding problems drawing walks, according to General Manager Dayton Moore.

[Both of these stories were written by former Kansas City Star employee Jeffrey Flanagan, who now writes for FOX Sports Kansas City, which, and you aren't going to believe this, broadcasts Royals games! You might remember Flanagan from this.]

You might be expecting me to make points about component park factors, what other teams do in Kauffman or in their own parks given those factors, player development, or something else. But Moore and Maloof got me thinking. What other difficulties has Kauffman imposed upon the Royals over the years? I did some research, and lo-and-behold, I found a whole different set of park factors for The K.

As with all park factors 100 is league average. Factors below 100 indicate that the park deflates or decreases something or some event, factors above 100 indicate that is favors some event.

Here are the path-breaking new factors:

Hemorroids: 125

Collisions: 119

Perceived (versus actual) skills of former Atlanta Braves talent: 124

Public relations: 85

Selling high on veterans: 78

Perceived (versus actual) wisdom of former Atlanta Braves executives: 142

Placebo effect of Phiten necklaces: 115

Over-hype for farm system: 189

First baseman throw-receiving from outfielders: 79

Apparent value of pre-Dayton Moore era acquisitions: 88

Sunglasses delivery: 73

Hitting Development: 81

Pitching Development: 70

Tarps: 137

Plus Hands: 200




Print This Post

Matt Klaassen reads and writes obituaries in the Greater Toronto Area. If you can't get enough of him, follow him on Twitter.


3 Responses to “Calculated: More Component Park Factors for Kauffman Stadium”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. jesse says:

    Do this represent one year totals, i.e. this year, or are they 3 year averages?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. maguro says:

    What’s the factor for nad taps? I suspect it’s on the high side.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *