GIF: Jim Johnson’s Jim Johnson

Because Oriole Jim Johnson plays for the Orioles, there’s a strong chance that no one — perhaps besides his teammates and Buck Showalter and Buck Showalter’s grizzled and nameless manservant — knows who he is.

In fact, there appears to be at least one reason to know who Jim Johnson is — and it’s embedded above these electronic words.

The footage you see here is taken from the ninth inning of Baltimore’s victory over Boston last (Monday) night. With a 1-0 count against Adrian Gonzalez, Johnson threw this 97 mph offering with 6.2 inches of armside run and 5.8 inches of “rise” (relative to a spinless ball, that is).

While the pitch was classified by Pitch F/x as a four-seamer, the dramatic movement — combined with the fact that a number of Johnson’s pitches are classified as two-seamers, too — suggests Johnson’s pitch might be either.

Of the 14 fastballs he threw Monday night, Johnson got whiffs on four of them (28.6%) — about four or five times the league average for swing-and-misses on fastballs.

In a potentially related story, every woman in the Baltimore area woke up pregnant.

Brooks Baseball. Brooks Baseball. Brooks Baseball.

Print This Post

Carson Cistulli occasionally publishes spirited ejaculations at The New Enthusiast.

9 Responses to “GIF: Jim Johnson’s Jim Johnson”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. Eminor3rd says:

    Holy ****

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Yirmiyahu says:

    Looks like the trajectory of the ball sharply changes halfway to the plate. I love it when baseballs do impossible things.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. reillocity says:

    Johnson’s obviously perfected the three-seamer, no?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  4. Pat says:

    It’s like the power sinker Chien Ming Wang used to throw, at his best, only with more velocity.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  5. The Rajah says:


    Vote -1 Vote +1

  6. Morse says:

    It was obviously a 5-seamer.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  7. Michael says:

    Haven’t fallen in love with the ridiculousness of any pitch this much since Darvish’s slider.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  8. AustinRHL says:

    Jesus, that was a 97 mph pitch? Is it possible that this is even better than Daniel Bard’s mind-bending two-seamer you showed us in a previous post?

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current day month ye@r *