Rule Change Means More Players to Choose From for Postseason Roster

Fans often are confused about which players are eligible for the postseason roster. Baseball actually changed the rule slightly this year, and it’s worth noting.

In the past, players on the 25-man roster as of Aug. 31 were eligible, along with players on the disabled list. The overall restriction was not that severe, however; any player in the organization could replace an injured player.

Ken Rosenthal, 9/1/14

The new rule, as the article goes on to explain*, is that teams may choose anyone for the postseason roster, past or present, living or dead, who ever spent any time in their organization at all. That means that should the Royals avoid a September collapse and make the postseason, they will be adding 1980 George Brett and a whole bunch of Bret Saberhagens to their roster, in the hope of beating out 1932 Jimmie Foxx, 1901 Nap Lajoie, 1931 Lefty Grove, and the rest of the A’s powerhouse squad.

“We think it’s more fair this way,” said no one.

“Definitely,” said Brian Cashman.

“But– but– wait–” said Andrew Friedman.

The motivation behind the rule change is so that Derek Jeter isn’t robbed of a final postseason and gets to continue to log World Series at-bats for all of eternity.

“Oh, you didn’t explain it like that,” said Friedman. “Now it makes sense. Anything for Jeter.”

Ernie Banks is really hoping the Cubs can make it to the postseason someday soon. George Sisler also reportedly taking batting practice in his grave. (Not sure who is reporting that, but we’ll promote them to chief investigative correspondent.) Unclear how this new rule will affect Ted Williams, given his cryogenic condition.

*it does not



Print This Post

Jeremy Blachman is the author of Anonymous Lawyer, a satirical novel that should make people who didn't go to law school feel good about their life choices. Read more at McSweeney's or elsewhere. He likes e-mail.


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Yirmiyahu
Member

For this rule, do the lifetime bans apply to Pete Rose and Shoeless Joe? What if the team reincarnates a version of them from before their alleged misdeeds? 1911-1913 Shoeless Joe and 1968-1969 Pete Rose didn’t do anything wrong.

Yirmiyahu
Member

We obviously now need to determine an all-time 25-man roster for each franchise, and run a season simulation using those rosters.

cass
Guest
cass

Pedro vs. Kershaw is going to be intense. Or will it be Pedro vs. Koufax? The Dodgers are going to have a tough decision figuring out who starts game one.

Also looking forward to seeing Jackie Robinson face Strasburg.

Yirmiyahu
Member

I was going to point out that Montreal’s version of Pedro wasn’t that great, but then I remembered his breakout 1997 season. That’s obviously the Pedro they’d use.

cass
Guest
cass

Yep. He’d have to start game one, followed by the 2010 version of Strasburg.

Steven
Guest
Steven

You think Ted Williams’ frozen head could still hit .400?

John Elway
Member

Unless they put on a shift. Can’t leg out a bunt to beat it.

Just neighing.

#KeepNotGraphs

wpDiscuz