Triple Nerdity: A Call for Papers

Let’s face it, reading a baseball site like FanGraphs (but not NotGraphs, of course!) is pretty nerdy. If you want to double down on being a baseball nerd, the best route is fantasy baseball. But what if you want to triple your nerdity?

To the Academy!

Honestly, I do not post this as a joke. Well, not completely. I am told that a large number of smart people read this site (probably not my posts, but you never know). Thus I post this panel proposal so that those of our readers who are interested have a chance to mull it over and submit an abstract. Although I doubt I have the necessary qualifications, I will admit that I am tempted to submit something. And if I can think of something to submit, surely those among our multitudes of smart readers can, too. Let me be clear: this is not a call to mockery or joke abstracts, there is no need to Sokal the panel organizer.

I am genuinely curious to see how the panel shapes up, and it would be great if one of you were on it. Will there be a mix of papers? Will there be an anthropological bent, from “inside” the world of fantasy sports as a “subculture?” Will it be critical of fantasy sports as a late capitalist and/or phallo-logocentric ideology to be unmasked? Or will it be a celebration of fantasy sports, one that, as so often in this sort of work, “celebrates” those aspects of the group investigated just to the same extent that group reflects the researcher’s own work? Perhaps one of you can help it be something more…

Hopefully, we will have updates as the panel unfolds (and feel free to leave relevant comments below), and perhaps as our readers attend or even participate. A perspective “inside” fantasy sports nerd-dom would be welcome, rather than simply another excuse to rattle off a bunch of jargon from Badiou, Agamben, earlier Continental imports such as Baudrillaud or Žižek (I assume Žižek is passé by now in the latest-and-greatest world of North American “cultural theory”), or one of their American equivalents like Frederic Jameson (if you think my posts are badly written, try opening any of Jameson’s works at random). I can see it now: “The Transition from Traditional Rotisserie to Head-to-Head Linear Weight Leagues: Truth Procedure or Ideological State Apparatus?” Rather than these subtle (and not-so-subtle) attempts to revive the spirit of Louis Althusser, a.k.a. The Paris Strangler, it would be nice if someone with a first-person, detailed knowledge of fantasy sports and analysis offered an informed perspective.

Maybe that is asking too much. Let us know of your plans and what you think. Will any of you be submitting an abstract? Have you already? Are you one of the organizers? Jokes and snarky remarks aside, I am genuinely interested in the possibilities here. If you know of any similar events, please shoot me a line on Twitter or email NotGraphs’ Hot Hotline.

A hearty hat-tip to Eitan Kensky for bringing this posting to my attention. You can read some from Mr. Kensky’s collected wisdom here. For the more baseball-oriented, here is a recent essay of Kensky’s on Hank Greenberg.

Print This Post

Matt Klaassen reads and writes obituaries in the Greater Toronto Area. If you can't get enough of him, follow him on Twitter.

9 Responses to “Triple Nerdity: A Call for Papers”

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
  1. Ben says:

    Jameson is the clearest writer of any of those people you name dropped.
    Zizek is not “earlier” than either Badiou or Agamben and he’s certainly not passe in North American cultural theory. In many ways the North Americans still haven’t caught with him.
    Your attempt at making academics look pretentious comes off as very…pretentious.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Thanks for the comment, Ben, but I think you may be taking this whole thing a bit too seriously. Anyhoo…

      Whether or not his work came before or after, it is my (non-specialist) impression from those who do work in the field that the North American reception of Zizek started before Agamben and Badiou, but I am willing to accept correction on this score.

      As for being “passé,” that was a comment on the generally fad-driven character of the reception of continental theory in the Anglophone world, not on Zizek’s work itself and its being “ahead” or “behind” North American theory.

      As for Jameson being the clearest writer listed… I will let others judge whether Ben means that as a defense of Jameson or an attack on the others.

      Cheers, and I really do thank you for reading and commenting.

      Vote -1 Vote +1

      • Ben says:

        Thanks for responding to my dickish comment in a polite and reasonable way.
        Obviously this conversation falls very far outside of the scope of your article, but I’d just like to say that it’s not very wise to assume that something is superficial or incorrect just because it uses an esoteric language. Sabermetricians, of all people, should know this!

        Vote -1 Vote +1

        • Sure. I’d just like to note that I don’t say that it is either superficial or incorrect. I’ve been known to use excessive jargon myself, something I wish I could avoid. But even when it is necessary or acceptable, I don’t think that exempts it from teasing, at the very least. Kant is a great thinker, but I’m sure even the most sympathetic readers of Kant would agree that his use of language was eminently mock-able!

          This is not to say I have no position on the issues of language or other things, but as you note, it is sort of outside the scope of the usual NotGraphs discourse.

          Vote -1 Vote +1

          • Ben says:

            You’re right. Teasing is all in good fun.
            And I never mentioned how much I enjoyed your fake academic title.

            Vote -1 Vote +1

    • Blue says:

      I find it amusing that a postmodernist would use the phrase “caught up with.”

      Vote -1 Vote +1

  2. Tom says:

    could there be three sweeter words?

    Call for papers

    I think not

    Vote -1 Vote +1

  3. Jen says:

    Thanks for upstaging my birthday present for Eitan. Shout out on fangraphs always beats leather belt.

    Vote -1 Vote +1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Current ye@r *