Why Abraham Lincoln Is on My Hall of Fame Ballot

1865_Abraham_Lincoln_O-103c

First things first: I’ve accepted that this is a hopeless case. Abraham Lincoln won’t make it into the Hall this year, or any year. The pointy-headed math-geeks who have hijacked our culture have no time for an Honest Abe; they glance over his stat sheet, note the blank spaces with a sneer, and conclude that the rest of us ignoramuses are suffering from a sad delusion. No matter how much we might revere the guy, the numbers reveal the truth: the Great Emancipator just didn’t put up the “value” of a Tim Raines or an Alan Trammell or whatever sabermetric darling they’re mooning over lately.

Well, I’ve got news for the geeks. Unless you watch this glorious sport of ours with your nose buried in a slide-rule — and that, I’ll maintain till the day I die, is not watching at all — the numbers aren’t, and never will be, everything. The numbers don’t tell you how the heart of every Yankee soldier skipped a beat when Abe stepped on the field at Antietam. The numbers don’t have much to say about the resounding poetry that left his lips that day at Gettysburg. And the numbers are plain useless when it comes to telling of the cloud that darkened the Union after that fateful evening at Ford’s Theatre.

Consider these other intangibles:

– As the first Republican president, and the first to be born outside the 13 original colonies, Lincoln forever changed the political landscape.
– Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address is the most quoted speech in American history.
– Lincoln remains the only President to hold a patent.

Here’s a question, then, for the statheads. If the rest of us are suffering from a delusion, then what of the two million souls who proudly voted Lincoln into office in 1864? What of the three million slaves who were given their dignity back, in one fell swoop, by his magnificent Proclamation? What of the countless scholars who have rated him, over the years, as the greatest of American Presidents? Were they equally deluded? Are we to chuck out their cherished beliefs like last week’s potatoes, simply because they can’t be captured by “the numbers”?

The Old Railsplitter won’t make it into Cooperstown in my lifetime. I’ve resigned myself to that fact. But no matter what his Wins Above Replacement says, when the Union is on the line, there’s still no one I’d trust more with my country. And I’d suggest the geeks resign themselves to that.




Print This Post



Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Resolution
Guest
Resolution
2 years 4 months ago

It was a sad day when Steinbrenner made him shave…

Stuart
Guest
Stuart
2 years 4 months ago

Are you sure you are using the right measure of WAR. Using presidentialreference.com Lincoln is right up there in WAR with Teddy Roosevelt (someone no one argues about Hall worthiness).

frivoflava29
Guest
frivoflava29
2 years 4 months ago

Yeah, he was pretty good when it comes to WAR, especially civil

Frank
Guest
Frank
2 years 4 months ago

I think Teddy is overrated (his WAR is inflated by unreliable economic metrics that forget his refraining from breaking up monopolies).

scatterbrian
Member
Member
scatterbrian
2 years 4 months ago

It’s Abraham Zoolander!

Ziggy
Guest
Ziggy
2 years 4 months ago

Talk about a great career being tragically cut short.

Stuart
Guest
Stuart
2 years 4 months ago

Lincoln is a classic peak value guy. Not a compiler like Eisenhower.

Frank
Guest
Frank
2 years 4 months ago

Lincoln may have freed the slaves, but he never saw blacks as his equals. He saw slavery as a sin and wanted to end it (not at the expense of his Union though), but he also wanted to send all of the blacks to Liberia because they couldn’t compete with whites in the US so he wanted the “humane” thing in allowing them to prosper elsewhere.

Dylan
Guest
Dylan
2 years 4 months ago

This is baseball, not politics.

Frank
Guest
Frank
2 years 4 months ago

That’s exactly the type of anti-sabermetric argument I hoped to avoid on Notgraphs.

NotFrank
Guest
NotFrank
2 years 4 months ago

I enjoy humorous articles and understand what parody is.

Not NotFrank
Guest
Not NotFrank
2 years 4 months ago

I enjoy the usage of double negatives.

NotFrank
Guest
NotFrank
2 years 4 months ago

I never watch the History Channel.

Detroit Michael
Guest
Detroit Michael
2 years 4 months ago

It’s more likely that Abraham Lincoln invented baseball than Abner Doubleday did.

losealot
Guest
losealot
2 years 4 months ago

are you kidding? had lincoln finished out his career his decline would have been more severe than almost anyone else’s! sure he put up great WAR numbers from 1861 to 1865 but that’s just too short a sample. besides, he was never a five tool guy, he didn’t have a good face, and his girlfriend was super ugly.

losealot
Guest
losealot
2 years 4 months ago

amendment: i double checked his numbers and he has 1 WAR for his entire career!!! and that’s as a manager! and while guys like bill clinton are literally everywhere, he doesn’t have even one post-season appearance. not a hall of famer in my book.

Mike Green
Guest
Mike Green
2 years 4 months ago

And his great, great, great, great grandson Brad is ,well, pretty great himself.

Rich Mahogany
Guest
Rich Mahogany
2 years 4 months ago

This site is for debating the Baseball Hall of Fame, not the Vampire Hunting Hall of Fame.

wpDiscuz