Pedant’s Corner

Note to the Wall Street Journal: It’s the “Rule 5 Draft,” not the “Rule V Draft.” The error is one that I’d normally let slide, but the article itself contains evidence that this was not some typo:

The Rule V draft fits perfectly in the lexicon of baseball, where words like “non-tendered,” “infield fly,” and “non-waiver trade deadline” cause casual fans to scratch their heads in bewilderment. (To answer the usual first question – V is a Roman numeral, not a letter.)

In the WSJ’s defense, hey, even a wrong answer is an answer.


Print This Post
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Petr
Guest
Petr

Reminds me of my favorite movie: V for Vendetta. His room number was V (for 5). Can’t believe this passed the editor.

Dan Whitney
Guest
Dan Whitney

Paul DePodesta refers to it as the Rule V Draft on his blog. The confusion seems to extend beyond the WSJ.

Pete Toms
Guest
Pete Toms

I use Rule V, always have.  I also use Rule IV.  I checked BA and they use Rule 5.  In all things minor league, defer to BA.

Rob
Guest
Rob

The WSJ has really gone to pot since the Murdoch takeover.

wpDiscuz