Meet the Extraordinary Freddy Peralta

Sometimes, when players are first promoted, their teams try to ease them in. After all, there’s already plenty of pressure, and you don’t want to give someone the shakes. Might as well give a guy the opportunity to get comfortable. Other times, whether by design or necessity, there’s no such special treatment. A few weeks ago, Eric Lauer became the 27th starting pitcher to make his big-league debut in Coors Field. You might remember Lauer for half-smiling after allowing a grand slam. Lauer was charged with seven runs in three frames, which is not good, but the history of these debuts is predictably not good — starters have allowed 6.9 runs per nine innings. Coors Field is a beast. Nothing in the minors can prepare you for major-league bats in Colorado.

Sunday afternoon, 21-year-old Freddy Peralta became the 28th starting pitcher to make his big-league debut in Coors Field. It wasn’t really supposed to happen that way, but Chase Anderson fell ill, and Peralta was scheduled to pitch in Colorado Springs. He was actually going to pitch in front of his family for the first time in his career. The sudden change of plans abruptly sent everyone to Denver. One would assume that expectations were modest. And yet, in the bottom of the sixth, this is how Peralta left the mound:

As a rule of thumb, starting pitchers generally aren’t happy to see their managers. Starters, as a breed, want to pitch until their arms fall off. But Peralta left beaming after 98 pitches, because he left with a 7-0 lead. He’d only just allowed his first hit of the game, and out of the 21 Rockies batters he’d faced, 13 of them had struck out. Peralta became just the fifth pitcher in recorded history to pick up at least 13 strikeouts in his debut. Peralta was no stranger to strikeouts in the minors, but nothing he’d done could compare to this, shutting down a lineup of big-leaguers in the league’s most hitter-friendly ballpark. And of Peralta’s 98 pitches, 90 were fastballs, which averaged about 92 miles per hour.

Peralta dominated the Rockies, in Colorado. He dominated them in his first game in the majors. And he dominated them with one pitch.

The game is tremendously useful for the purpose of understanding what Peralta is as a pitcher. He does have a breaking ball. He does occasionally mess around with a changeup. But the fastball is Peralta’s bread and butter, very obviously, and look at this plot of swings and misses, from Baseball Savant:

The fastball generated 18 whiffs alone. There are whiffs off the plate, and there are whiffs up. But you also see that assortment middle-middle. That tells you two things. One, Peralta doesn’t have pinpoint command. No one wants to pitch middle-middle. But two, he was fooling hitters anyway. Freddy Peralta, pitching in Coors Field, was getting away with middle-middle low-90s fastballs. He has his delivery to thank.

Here’s a middle-middle swing and miss:

Here’s another:

Here’s another:

And for a change of pace, here’s an ugly swing and miss off the plate away:

It should be noted that Peralta doesn’t have a slow fastball. He also throws a fastball that doesn’t have much horizontal movement to it, making it look kind of like a cutter. The fastball is atypical, and since Peralta was pitching his first game, the Rockies hadn’t seen him. The first time through the order, the Rockies went hitless, with five strikeouts. On the other hand, just one of the remaining 12 Rockies batters recorded a hit, and eight of them struck out. Peralta wasn’t figured out on Sunday. And Jesus Aguilar offered an insightful remark:

“It was unbelievable. I’ve never seen their second baseman [DJ LeMahieu] look like that, or Blackmon. They didn’t see the ball. It was unbelievable. Good for him. These are really good hitters, and he dominated, easy, with the fastball.”

They didn’t see the ball. I think that’s exactly right. We don’t write all that much about deception, because we don’t have particularly useful measures of deception, but some pitchers have more of it, and some pitchers have less. Peralta has a sneaky fastball, which is what allowed him to succeed over the middle of the plate. That Nolan Arenado swing posted above — that’s not the swing of someone who’s seeing the ball clearly. Peralta was doing something tricky, and it’s all just part of his motion.

There’s some crossfire to it. That helps, but it’s far from the full explanation. This isn’t just about a guy who throws a little across his body. Allow me to excerpt from Eric Longenhagen’s December write-up of the Brewers’ top prospects:

Peralta generates seven feet of extension, which is up in Tim Lincecum territory, and does so with a cross-body delivery that begins on the third-base side of the rubber. He also has a low arm slot and loose, whippy arm action that further adds to hitters’ confusion.

Here’s a poor-quality slow-motion side view of Peralta going to the plate:

Very usefully, Baseball Savant allows us to search for extension. Not directly, but we can search for the difference between perceived and actual velocity. The closer to home plate a pitch is released, the faster it’ll seem to the hitter, since it spends less time in the air. Last year, when we last saw Carter Capps, he was adding about 2.4 perceived miles per hour to his fastball, because of his jump off the rubber. That’s an extreme perceived velocity bump. And Peralta? On Sunday, Peralta’s fastballs gained 2.2 perceived miles per hour. He was right there in Capps territory, without the silly quirk. For reference, here are all of 2018’s pitchers, with their perceived velocity gains or losses, and their heights:

Only Tyler Glasnow adds more to his fastball than Peralta does, and where Glasnow stands 6’8, Peralta stands 5’11. It’s easier for Glasnow to generate that extension, because he’s simply a big guy. Peralta’s extension comes from his lower body, and the ball gets up on the hitter quicker than the hitter expects. And as the last part, Peralta’s ball is pretty well hidden. Eno Sarris wrote about Yusmeiro Petit‘s “invisiball” in October of 2014. Petit has long been considered to be a pitcher with deception on his side. Look at Peralta just prior to release:

The ball is behind his head. Then the ball is behind his elbow. Then the ball is shown to the hitter, just as it’s about to come out. This is what Eric was referring to with the whippy arm action. The hitter loses sight of the ball, and then, all of a sudden, the ball explodes on the plate. An unusual delivery delivers a fastball with unusual movement, and it’s not just the Rockies who couldn’t figure the fastball out. The fastball is why Peralta has been a strikeout machine in the minors.

It’s not that Peralta is obviously a finished product. He could stand to add some refinement, polishing a second or third pitch. It’s not that Peralta is definitely the best starting pitcher right now in the Brewers’ rotation. He needs to make more starts, and he needs to repeat some opponents. But I don’t think the Brewers were planning on Peralta being much of a factor in the 2018 season at all. Peralta has forced his way into the conversation, on the basis of one start alone. Pitchers will tell you when they’re ready for a greater challenge. Peralta looks ready before the Brewers expected, in large part because hitters can’t easily see his pitches. Turns out that’s a useful trait to possess.

We hoped you liked reading Meet the Extraordinary Freddy Peralta by Jeff Sullivan!

Please support FanGraphs by becoming a member. We publish thousands of articles a year, host multiple podcasts, and have an ever growing database of baseball stats.

FanGraphs does not have a paywall. With your membership, we can continue to offer the content you've come to rely on and add to our unique baseball coverage.

Support FanGraphs




Jeff made Lookout Landing a thing, but he does not still write there about the Mariners. He does write here, sometimes about the Mariners, but usually not.

newest oldest most voted
david k
Member
david k

A question that comes to mind is: does this delivery put more stress on his elbow than that of other pitching deliveries?

SucramRenrut
Member
Member
SucramRenrut

If anything I would think that it would be better for the elbow as there is probably way more drag on the arm from a lower slot.