Mets Add Todd Frazier at Bargain Price

As ESPN’s Christina Kahrl noted last week on Twitter, perhaps it is spending that is the new market inefficiency.

After all, who anticipated that Brewers would be responsible for the greatest free-agent deal to date? And tonight, another team in something of a no-man’s land has made its second splash of the New Year, perhaps sensing opportunity.

The Mets entered Monday forecast to finish 80-82. They’ve passed the offseason firmly entrenched in that space between the Haves and Have Nots, a space fewer teams seem interested in inhabiting. But with the addition of Todd Frazier, they appear to have paid relatively little for a player who can help at third or first base, positions at which Asdrubal Cabrera and Dominic Smith, respectively, sat atop the club’s depth chart entering the day.

The deadly accurate FanGraphs crowdsource projections and former FanGraphs manager editor Dave Cameron each forecast Frazier to earn a three-year, $42-million deal. Frazier ranked as Dave’s No. 13 overall free agent, one spot ahead of the Mets’ other notable free-agent signing, Jay Bruce. Frazier, whom FanGraphs dot com projects to be a perfectly competent major-league player (.234/.321/.444, 2.3 WAR), settles for significantly less money and one fewer year than Bruce, at a reported two years and $17 million.

While Bruce received precisely what the crowd predicted (three years, $39 million), the contract nevertheless seemed like a pretty good one for Bruce given the nature of this winter’s free-agent market.

The Frazier deal, meanwhile, might be evidence of the New Year’s discount effect, a phenomenon we’ve cited several times here at FanGraphs during the offseason.

Max Rieper of Royals Review found that, from 2013 to -17, free agents who signed before Jan. 1 received guaranteed dollars 4.0% above FanGraphs’ crowdsourced estimates. Free agents who signed after Jan. 1, meanwhile, received 25.3% less than FanGraphs’ estimates. This makes sense: anxiety theoretically increases for players, and demand drops, as spring training nears.

Frazier signed for 40.4% fewer dollars than the crowd’s forecast. He appears to have lowered his demands in order to ensure employment in 2018 and 2019. Frazier’s contract should be sobering for those free agents still holding out hope that their initial contract demands will be met less than two weeks before the beginning of spring games.

Frazier’s contract might be a sign of the discounts we can expect during what remains of the winter. There might also have been something else working against him, too, beyond the strength of the third base position and the lack of obvious fits/needs outside of New York.

Frazier can hit the ball out of the park. We know that. We’ve seen the majestic home runs in games and in the Home Run Derby setting. But at a moment in the game when seemingly everyone is able to hit home runs, perhaps Frazier’s carrying tool had less appeal in the current market. With clubs devaluing free agency, holding back spending power for next offseason, and determined to remain under the luxury-tax threshold, players are already facing an uphill battle.

What’s interesting about Frazier is he that he showed significant secondary skill growth in his age-31 campaign last season. This might be an even greater value signing for the Mets than the forecasts suggest.

After having never once produced a double-digit walk rate in his career, Frazier posted a 14.4% mark last season while also cutting his strikeout rate by three percentage points (21.7%). It was the sixth-best walk rate in the game amongst qualified hitters.

Frazier cut his out-of-zone swing rate by a whopping eight percentage points to a career-low 24.5% in 2017, and his swing rate fell to a career-low 58.6%, down from 72.6% in 2015. His swinging-strike rate fell to 9.3%, another career low.

The discipline gains at age 31 are pretty interesting.

Like Bruce, Frazier has been an extreme fly-ball hitter for a while. Frazier’s fly-ball rate (47.5%) ranked eighth in the sport. Bruce ranked 11th.

We’ll have to see if this is the beginning of a wave of discount signings for clubs, but the Mets are the type of team that is wise to take advantage of such a market. If enough things break right, if we squint, we could see New York playing meaningful baseball late into the summer. Frazier can help make that happen and at a bargain of a price.

We hoped you liked reading Mets Add Todd Frazier at Bargain Price by Travis Sawchik!

Please support FanGraphs by becoming a member. We publish thousands of articles a year, host multiple podcasts, and have an ever growing database of baseball stats.

FanGraphs does not have a paywall. With your membership, we can continue to offer the content you've come to rely on and add to our unique baseball coverage.

Support FanGraphs




A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.

newest oldest most voted
Roger McDowell Hot Foot
Member
Roger McDowell Hot Foot

Good signing, especially at this price, I’d say. In addition to the January discount we could speculate about the likelihood this was a hometown discount for New Jersey kid Frazier.

If the Mets have an observable organizational philosophy at this point it sure seems to be that batting average doesn’t matter to them almost at all compared to OBP and power.

DBA455
Member
Member
DBA455

Great signing for the Mets, but agree that it’s odd that the hometown discount factor went unmentioned.

In fact this is the first time since he arrived in New York that I’ve heard Frazier’s name without hearing “Tom’s River” within the the next 30 seconds.

I had started to assume it was part of his contract as paid promo spot from the tourism board: Major League Baseball playoffs brought to you by pharmaceuticals for septuagenarians – and Todd Frazier, brought to you by the Tom’s River Little League team!

Kristopher
Member
Kristopher

I wonder how much of this is home town discount. Come July, Frazier is going to be a pretty decent asset. If you assume at that point he’ll be 1.5 YRS / 13M, I think there’s a lot of teams that would stomach that if they had a season long injury to, i dunno, Travis Shaw, even if they knew Shaw would be back in 2019. Whether it’s performance or injury, I’m sure someone’s going to be less than happy with their 3B situation.

I guess we’ll find out when we see whether he has a no-trade.

GoNYGoNYGoGo
Member
Member
GoNYGoNYGoGo

As reported by Metsmerizedonline.com, Frazier gets a $500K bonus if traded. That would make it a 1.5 YRS/13.5 million, which is still pretty reasonable.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
Member
Roger McDowell Hot Foot

I think the Mets are going to want to keep Frazier even if they’re out of it at the deadline this year (which I see no reason to assume at this point, dependent on pitching health as that is). Asdrubal Cabrera is the most obvious deadline trade candidate.

sadtrombone
Member
sadtrombone

I agree this is a really good deal for the Mets. It’s not the big move that we were clamoring for, but they needed another infielder and Frazier is a pretty good one at a good price.

If this really was the best offer out there, other teams should have tried to top it. Which makes me think that the location played a pretty big role. So I’m also not convinced that this is as good an example of the “January discount” as the author seems to think.

More generally, the “January discount” is likely spurious…the more fundamental supply and demand for free agent labor likely produces both a late signing and lower salaries. As a result, the “January discount” is more a statement about the underlying market forces than the date of calendar, or a less-than-convincing argument from people who think that free agent spending will rise unconstrained by quality of the free agents.